Why and how to make transnational company accountable for their actions abroad

Why and how to do TNC accountable for their actions abroad

1. Introduction

While the trade globalisation advancement is hastening, multinational companies ( TNCs ) , particularly those powerful Group companies from developed states play more and more of import functions in universe economic growing, even the planetary administration. “ What TNCs do ( or non make ) affects the lives of a significant portion of the universe population. ” ( David Held and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, 2005, p110 ) . By and large talking, TNCs contribute to the whole universe much more than they are damaging to. However, there are still jobs created by TNCs because they chase for the involvements by “ carnal liquors ” without refering approximately much for future, for people, particularly for those who come from “ the 3rd universe ” . And this paper would concern more about the jobs, which is impacting developing states, as the consequence of TNCs ‘ abroad unexplainable actions.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

Harmonizing to my ain cognition and experiences, TNCs ‘ actions create jobs in three major facets, the job of Corruption, the job of Environment, and besides the job of Human Rights.

Corruptness non merely abuses the power from people, but besides steals the involvement belonging to people. It is an issue which about all the authoritiess are contending against. However, TNCs ‘ may actuate the corruptness unconsciously or even purposive when they do marketing, command, buttonholing and etc, because of the deficiency of purely jurisprudence or ordinance in foreign states.

When we make a reference of Environment, it is one of the most important subjects presents. The Climate alteration influences every individual individual through the whole universe which makes us should pay more attending on this austere world. The failure of the UN Climate alteration conference in Copenhagen, which merely happened two month ago, some argues that some TNCs and their lobbying group played large functions to forestall the binding understanding for their ain involvements.

Here what we talk about the human rights are more of the people of “ the 3rd universe ” , who are enduring and digesting the harsh working status. Most of the TNCs in fabricating industries set up their workss and mills in those developing states ( particularly in China and Southeast Asia ) for take downing their labor cost. It is sensible from enterprisers ‘ position, but non acceptable refering with the basic human rights that those workers have to work in unhealthy environment without basic work insurance.

Those three jobs should be taken earnestly to happen work outing methods before they are harmful for our all human societies, non merely for those specific developing states in where TNCs put up their mills and subordinates. Because, someway, the power of states is switching, no 1 wants to be the following victim.

2. The three major jobs

As mentioned above, the possible harm from the three jobs could be the chief grounds why TNCs should be more responsible for their actions abroad.

But we may doubt why those three jobs are acquiring worse and worse because of TNCs ‘ actions abroad? Is it truly true that those jobs are created or influenced more by TNCs?

2.1 Corruption Issue

As a cosmopolitan phenomenon in the universe, Corruption has been there for 1000s of old ages since the ancient societies were created.

“ ..Corruption is the maltreatment of public power for private addition ” ( J.J.Senturia, 1993 ) . This is a widely accepted definition of Corruption demoing the basic construct of Corruption in a literature manner – “ maltreatment ” could be the most important word here. Although the powers are from public, it is non contribute to the public wealth but for private addition. Even worse, it non merely steals the involvements from people, but besides may harm the basic involvements and rights of people. If the corruptness is traveling to be worse and worse, it may take to serious effect finally. For case, one of the chief grounds which caused the tragically “ Tiananmen Square protest of 1989 ” was the serious corruptness job during the first decennary of “ China Reform and Open ” .

And why we consider that to do the TNCs ‘ abroad action accountable is so of import to cut down the possible corruptness? This can be made clearer by the expression from R.Klitgaard who translated the above literary definition into an apprehensible manner:

“ C=M+D-A. Corruptness peers monopoly plus discretion subtraction accountability.. Combating corruptness, hence, begins with planing better systems. Monopolies must be reduced or carefully regulated. Official discretion must be clarified. Transparency must be enhanced. The chance of being caught, every bit good as the punishments for corruptness ( for both givers and takers ) must increase. ” ( R.Klitgaard, 1998.p.4 )

Harmonizing to the expression from R.Klitgaard, it is seemingly that TNCs should be supervised in effectual manner to heighten the transparence of their actions in order to cut down the corruptness degree. As mentioned before, the TNCs motivate the corruptness in two classs.

On the one manus their actions push corruptness unconsciously, as a consequence of the deficiency of related ordinances in host states. As they can non happen an expressed jurisprudence or ordinance to specify the graft, TNCs may drop into “ the prison quandary ” easy in this instance. For case, most of the TNCs in China face difficult state of affairs to make up one’s mind to make or non make allowances for the “ Renqing-Mianzi ” of functionaries. The Chinese “ Renqing-Mianzi theoretical account ” includes a really of import construct which is explained as informal societal relationship ( aaˆ¦A?cA?A»guanxi ) . “ This construct differs from western networking behavior particularly in footings of its permeant application among the people throughout Chinese society, consciously or subconsciously, based on its cultural Confucian beginning ” ( Manfred Nitsche and Frank Diebel, 2008, p.85 ) . Most of the western enterprisers comprehend this construct in a incorrect manner, so they believe that graft could drive Chinese authorities functionaries to make more for their concern cooperation. For no 1 can command his/her rivals behaviors, enterpriser has to give inform “ nowadayss ” to the officials/potential purchasers to avoid losing possible contracts. Otherwise they may be trapped in deprived state of affairs if they stop while their rivals continue to make more.

On the other manus, besides the unconsciously forcing, there are suborners on intent as good which can be explained through combinable grounds. Since people normally put their eyes merely on the authorities functionaries who demand or accept payoffs, the punishments to the graft providers are highly soft. This phenomenon gives the TNCs misconceptions that the fiscal and reputational costs of exposure of graft are acceptable. By some steps, it encourages TNCs to take the hazard of graft chasing for potentially lager involvements. There was an illustration of graft provider with highly soft penalty last twelvemonth in China. In 2009, one media exposed that more than 25 high-ranking directors from 16 different Chinese province owned Iron & A ; Steel companies received big sums of “ nowadayss ” in signifiers. Those “ nowadayss ” were all from the Australian mineworker Rio Tinto group companies, for acquiring the trade secret to take advantages during the monetary value dialogue with Chinese companies. After the exposure, those directors from Chinese companies were punished badly, some of them even were thrown into gaol. However, the TNC from Australia did non endure much from this graft event beside the harm of its repute which can non be seen as a truly penalty in this instance. From one side, it is because that people focus more on how to penalize the receiving system ; from other side, it is because that there is no valid jurisprudence or ordinance in host states to justice and to penalize those TNCs from abroad who involve in graft.

Corruptnesss affected by TNCs ‘ actions in abroad states non merely damage the involvements from the states ‘ people, but besides harm the involvement of TNCs doing their costs unnecessarily higher and repute worse. Even worse, the corruptness may besides ache the authoritiess ‘ efficiency, and so drag the whole society mechanism in a negative coiling – no graft, no driving force on efficiency ; more graft, more harm on efficiency. This is what precisely tonss of developing states ‘ non-transparency authoritiess are confronting up.

We Chinese ever say: “ one manus entirely can non clap ” . To modulate the possible graft behavior, besides the host states ‘ authorities functionaries preserver their moral unity, there shall be effectual Torahs, ordinances and other methods to warn the TNCs ‘ behavior. This will be discussed subsequently.

2.2 Environment Issue

Following the measure of corruptness, while the planetary economic is accelerated by globalisation cooperation, the turning national and international consciousness of environment harm makes people and states try to happen more cooperation methods to mend our alone bluish planet. Although the environment issue has caught peoples ‘ attending for decennaries, the alleged “ understanding ” are still limited, even non reference to the existent effectual activities. In general, this is because that about all of the states and their companies concentrate in the growing of economic instead than other affairs. There is a positive expression that the harm to the nature during last 200 old ages since the industrial revolution is much worse than it was in the amount of human history before the first industrial revolution.

Of class, we can non state that the planetary clime alteration is the mistake of TNCs. Nevertheless, sing with the present circumstance, it possibly is the least controversial averment that TNCs aggravate the environmental impairments, peculiarly for the developing states ‘ natural environment. First of all because, a batch of powerful TNCs and their place states are reassign their extremely fouling workss to “ the 3rd universe ” with the purpose of cost decrease, accommodation of industrial construction and etc, which can be one of the chief grounds that the development states are enduring more in the clime alteration. Second, since the developing states normally merely play functions as the natural stuff beginnings, TNCs are prehending the involvements from them without refering about sustainable development in those states, which makes them be developing on an “ unhealthy ” , or even deformed manner. In some highly instances, some states may likely be trapped in “ Dutch diseases ” in the non far distant future yearss. ( E.g. many destitute African states as the diamonds provider ) The last but non least, TNCs and their lobbying group are non harm the developing states ‘ environment, but besides aching their place states ‘ involvements by act uponing the possible of environmental friendly planetary understanding. Sums of criticizes to TNCs, during and after the UN clime alteration conference in Copenhagen, animadversion that TNCs did impact the authoritiess ‘ determination abandoning the pacts for environment, with the lone ground that their involvement would be harmed a batch if the pact were passed and signed by states.

The environment issue may be non so earnestly as corruptness today, but it may do more dangerous effect to us human being in future. As all we know, “ bar is better than remedy ” , we need happen out effectual methods to protect our environment. Normally, for TNCs, it is self-regulation activity based on their sense of societal duties, which we all know is deficient. The worlds are forcing us to calculate out a solution to do TNCs be more accountable for environment. That is what we are traveling to speak in the undermentioned parts.

2.3 Human Rights Issue

Here what we mention as human rights is fundamentally involve in environment every bit good. The human rights are, harmonizing to the definition from Wikipedia as followers:

“ Human rights is a universalist construct of legal rights and moralss, which developed out of the Liberal Enlightenment in Europe and the United States, though it has since spread around the universe. Classless and relativist in mentality, advocates of the construct normally assert that all human beingsaa‚¬ ” regardless of cultural, organizational, spiritual or cultural associationsaa‚¬ ” should be entitled to certain societal, political and legal rights of acceptance. The precise nature of what should or should non be regarded as a human right is hotly debated, therefore the construct is slightly equivocal and unfastened to reading. ” ( Wikipedia )

“ All human existences are born f ree and equal in self-respect and rights. They are endowed with ground and scruples and should move towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. “ ( Article 1 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights ( UDHR ) )

The capable whom we will travel into is, someway still under arguments, the human rights of environment. The environment here non refers to the natural environment for the whole homo being, but specifically points to the on the job conditions provided by the TNCs to the developing states ‘ labors.

“ There are two basic constructs of environmental human rights in the current human rights system. The first is the right to a healthy or equal environment is itself a human right ( as seen in both Article of the African Charter on Human and Peoples ‘ Rights ) . The 2nd construct is the thought that environmental human rights can be derived from other human rights, normally – the right of life, the right of wellness, the right to private household life and the right to belongings ( among many others ) . This 2nd theory enjoys much more widespread usage in human rights tribunal around the universe, as those rights are contained in many human paperss ” ( Wikipedia )

We adopt the 2nd construct as bulk do in this paper. The right of wellness is the nucleus factor why we blame TNCs for their irresponsible abroad actions. Most of the fabricating TNCs from developed states are switching their workss from place states to the host states in South in where is full of inexpensive labor force. As we mentioned before, it is sensible to cut the labor cost in this manner under the globalisation epoch. We accept current fact that the highly low pay are paid to those people in hapless states, whereas it relates to the states ‘ economic construction. However, compared with the status in TNCs ‘ place states, the direly rough working conditions for the 3rd universe workers in FDI workss are unreasonable and non-ignorable.

Research documents show that the jobs are centred in five facets, 1 ) high-intensity working hours. Most of plants working in TNCs offshoring workss in those hapless states has to work more than 80hours a hebdomad, which oversteps the legal length of work, and normally without any excess payments ; 2 ) bush leagues employee. in those states, people under 16 are frequently employed as unwritten use ; 3 ) insecure working conditions. Some of workers have to make dangerous occupation without necessary protective steps ( For case, to work with toxic lotion ) ; 4 ) privateness misdemeanor. Some workss and mills even have the ordinances to look into workers private materials naming it in a good name of “ security system ” ; 5 ) Incompletely or even without basic working insurance. This is the most extended and besides most hard state of affairs to better, because it relates to the whole society security system.

All those black behaviors merely go on in “ 3rd universe ” states, which is seemingly because of TNCs irresponsible actions abroad. Some of critics even call it “ favoritism and misdemeanor to human rights ” .

To work out this job, we have a long manner to travel.

3. How to do TNCs abroad actions accountable.

3.1 The basic definition

To reply this inquiry, we must good understand the accountable actions or answerability as stipulation.

“ Accountability is a construct in moralss and administration with several significances. It is frequently used synonymous with such constructs as duty, accountability, culpability, liability, and other footings associated with outlook of account-giving. As an facet of administration, it has been cardinal to treatments related to jobs in the populace sector, non-profit and private ( corporate ) universes. In leading functions, answerability is the recognition and premise of duty for actions, merchandises, determinations, and policies including the disposal, administration, and execution within the range of the function or employment place and embracing the duty to describe explain and be answerable for ensuing effects.

As a term related to administration, answerability has been hard to specify. It is often described as an account-giving relationship between persons, e.g. “ A is accountable to B when A is obliged to inform B about A ‘s ( past or hereafter ) actions and determinations, to warrant them, and to endure penalty in the instance of eventual misconduct ” . ( Wikipedia )

From what I have understood, the most of import facts of answerability should be information sharing, which gives more transparence to public, so that public can do determinations consequently and the actions can be more easy supervised by public media, guided and regulated by authorities.

3.2 What we do.

To accomplish this great end, every society has strived for old ages with a batch of methods. Some of them are effectual, some of them are merely resource cachexia.

Transparency International ( TI ) , as an international NGO against corruptness has been contending since established in 1993. “ As a general rule TI as an organisation does non cover with specific individual instance of corruptness but efforts to develop and beef up the structural model for the prevention/curbing of corruptness. “ ( Werner Van Ham, 1998, p22 ) It truly plays a portion in the international anti-corruption a batch with its effectual thought – co-ordinating with national civil society as an equal spouse to elicit their ability of oversing corruptness. What ‘s more its National Chapters in different states have distinguished ends, for the National Chapters in flush western states, they focus more on the issue of graft in international concern minutess. “ On the other manus, National Chapters in the underdeveloped universe and in states of passage in the East in many cases find, that controling corruptness in their several states besides means happening ways of halting foreign companies from corrupting their elites. “ ( Werner Van Ham, 1998, p.24 ) Draw on the experience of TI, to contend against the international graft, the engagement of the civil societies and public media are indispensable as the most effectual oversing power. Besides, each host state should put up a specialised jurisprudence or ordinance demoing the corruptness criterion to steer and penalize the possible graft from TNCs as corruptness provider. For case, US TNCs theoretically have to obey the “ Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ” ( 1979 ) ( FCPA ) . A healthy and sufficient legal system at least is better than nil.

For environment protection, Greenpeace has done a batch as the most of import environmental friendly NGO since 1971. Nevertheless it is far off adequate to halt the impairment of planetary environment, unless all the states and TNCs realize what they are making are crediting the resource from our offspring which can be long -term and irreversible harm for our planet. In this instance, we need a autocratic intergovernmental cooperation system to coerce the TNCs, because fundamentally all the enterprisers merely think about maximum their net income with higher precedence degree than their societal duty.

To better the human rights status for the poorness, International Labour Organization ( ILO ) still has a long manner to travel. We have to acknowledge, sing with the local CPI, the mean low pay is non an easy issue to alter which is the chief ground for TNCs to switch their workss location. However, there ‘s no alibi for the rough working conditions which need expressed criterions to demo where the underside as a human rights-respecting manner is. And for those developing states, better their societal security system is the lone manner to coerce TNCs regard more to their people. After all, without the obligatory jurisprudence or ordinance, no man of affairs would destroy his net income to protect the labor as a voluntary.

In general, all the authoritiess should seek for more cooperation on set uping effectual international understanding which can be transform into or steer the domestic statute law. Because TNCs are still the merchandise of domestic jurisprudence, as legal individuals, must be subjected by legal power of the states concerned and control. WTO could be a perfect illustration for this sort of cooperation. In add-on to this, “ soft Torahs ” , like “ Global Compact ” and “ the Equator rules ” , should be paid more attending on to modulate the TNCs, although usually it ‘s accepted by TNCs of their ain agreements. ( The alleged “ soft Torahs ” refers to the chief organic structure through the multi-nation statute law or through a formal procedure to develop or organize, but with non-mandatory adhering codification of behavior. ) The last pick but may be non so unadvisable from me, to seek more to promote or coerce TNCs self-regulated. Actually, by now, through active self-binding behavior of TNCs to presume their duty is still considered as the most effectual agencies of colony.

In the terminal, citing the point of view from Mr. Held and Mr. Koenig-Archibugi as the decision,

“ Ultimately, the constitution of effectual mechanisms for keeping TNCs accountable may depend on the success of large-scale reforms of international establishments and the redefinition of their authorization. ‘Robust ‘ answerability mechanisms require province action, but this action is democratized. Where executive multilateralism has failed, societal-backed multilateralism may win. “ ( David Held and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, 2005, p135 ) .

Reference List

[ 1 ] David Held and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi. ( 2005 ) . Global Governance and Public Accountability. USA: Blackwell publication

[ 2 ] J.J.Senturia. ( 1993 ) . Corruptness, Political, In: David L Sills ( Ed. ) New York: international Encyclopaedia of the Social Science, vol. VI.

[ 3 ] R.Klitgaard. ( 1998 ) . International cooperation against corruptness. Spain: Finance and Development, Mar 1998, Vol. 35. No.1

[ 4 ] Manfred Nitsche and Frank Diebel. ( 2008 ) Guanxi Economicss: Confucius Meets Lenin, Keynes, and Schumpeter in Contemporary China. Intervention 5 ( 1 ) Journal of Economics, 2008.

[ 5 ] “ Human Rights ” from Wikipedia: hypertext transfer protocol: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights

( Access available by 25th, Feb, 2010 )

[ 6 ] “ Accountability ” from Wikipedia: hypertext transfer protocol: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accountable

( Access available by 25th, Feb, 2010 )

[ 7 ] Werner Van Ham. ( 1998 ) . Transparency International ( TI ) – The international NGO against Corruption. ( a instance survey ) . Master thesis

[ 8 ] Steven Lydenberg. ( 2005 ) . Corporations and The Public Interest: steering the unseeable manus. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler publishing houses, Inc.

[ 9 ] Rorden Wikinson. ( 2005 ) The Global Governance Reader. London and New York: Routledge.

[ 10 ] Doris Fuchs. ( 2007 ) . Business Power in Global Governance. USA and UK: Lynne Rienner Publishers.


I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out