Gianni Versace ‘s safety-pin frock was an unchallenged hit when it came upon the manner scene in 1994. Worn by then-unknown actress Elizabeth Hurley in the filmFour Weddings and a Funeral, the frock shortly catapulted her into stardom. As for the movie itself: those who do non remember the plot—or even the film—makeremember ‘the frock ‘ . What was it about this frock that so captivated the universe of manner? What was it about the society of the 1890ss that made it so receptive to this peculiar frock? Finally, what do we cognize about Versace, the adult male who designed the frock and brought the frock into the limelight? These inquiries will be addressed in this paper.
The Fashion World
By the early 1890ss, the relationship between the universe of manner and an person ‘s societal life had become progressively complex. What a individual wore had become synonymous with who that individual was—politically, economically, socially, and culturally. To be fashionably dressed was to do a statement to the universe about one ‘s superior standing in society—or about one’s aspirations to go superior. As one bookman has noted, ‘the right vesture can allow us entree to the right topographic points and the right people ‘ ( Jones, 2002: p. 21 ) . At the same clip, dressing sends out subliminal messages, leting the wearer—perhaps unconsciously—to express rebellion while still pull offing to externally conform. Scholar Lea Vergine has described manner as ‘the instrument that speaks and communicates without the word, or sounds, or drawings. . . . declaring resistance to the dominant civilization, but besides of despairing conformity ( 2000: p. 289 ) .
Sing this, it is easy to see how the function of the manner interior decorator took on extra importance. The function now included far more than simply planing a garment, or even a season ‘s worth of garments. Manner interior decorators had begun to experiment with constructs such as single individuality through the medium of frock. It was no longer plenty to simply ‘clothe ‘ the organic structure ; the interior decorator had to make points that allowed the people who buy them to experience as though they were purchasing a peculiar image or manner of life. Cultural and subcultural manners had become progressively diverse, and traditional codifications had begun to switch one time once more. As Jones explains, manner interior decorators ‘borrowed from the semiologies of apparels and pushed the boundaries by deliberately destructing rules and harmoniousnesss of vesture ‘ ( 2002: p. 22 ) .
In her Hagiographas on manner and society, Joann Entwistle asserts that ‘fashion, frock and ingestion provide ways of covering with the jobs of the modern universe, characterized by increasing atomization and a sense of pandemonium. Manner opens up possibilities for bordering the ego, nevertheless temporarily… ( 2000: p. 139 ) . In this visible radiation, one can see that manner maps non merely as a signifier of self-expression, but besides as a manner of exercising control over an progressively complex environment. It was in response to this environment that Gianni Versace created a frock that captured international attending: a combination of old and new, east and west. Highly equivocal in its socioeconomic message, the frock seemed to hold ‘something for everyone ‘ : it combined the traditional Indian saree with a version of punk—complete with the ‘safety-pin ‘ motive which gave the frock its name—to create a postmodernist outfit that appealed on several degrees. To many, the frock represented ‘a symbol of the transmutation of eastern civilization under western influences ‘ ( Martin, 1995 ) . Versace took the traditional frock signifier and gave it a western expression. The inclusion of safety pins, which ‘denote an version of hood life style ‘ , added a new and exciting border ( Martin, 1995 ) .
The Dress on Display: from Movie to Museum
Versace’s work was celebrated in a 2002 exhibition at the Victoria and Albert Museum [ V & A ; A ] . The exhibit showcased Versace’s ‘technical virtuosity’ , wrote one critic, observing that the interior decorator ‘challenged stuff and design conventions that are so good demonstrated in a museum exhibition that has every bit at its centre material civilization ‘ ( Mason ) Material civilization was an country in which Versace was to the full immersed, as this exhibit clearly demonstrated. His manners tended to be showy, innovative—and racy, with a touch of sado-masochism throughout. The ‘safety-pin’ frock was, of class, one of the chief attractive forces, of which there were three. The other two included frocks worn by Princess Diana and Naomi Campbell.
Harmonizing to Goldstein ( 2002 ) , ‘the frocks have pride of topographic point non because of their significance as manner, but because of the famous person of those who wore them’ , a statement which is surely problematic. There are those who would reason that Hurley’s famous person was a direct consequence of her holding been the first to have on the frock. She—or at least the frock she wore—is good remembered from the movieFour Weddings and a Funeral.Others would reason that it was the venue—conservative Great Britain—not the actress, which made the frock stand out ‘Consider: if Liz Hurley had worn “ that frock ” in Los Angeles, Rome or Rio, would anyone hold noticed? No. She would besides hold been seen for what she was: yet another unknown actress seeking to do a splash ‘ ( Goldstein, 2002 ) . At least one manner author suggests that the frock would non hold caused rather the same splash had it been worn by Liz Hurley in her current ‘svelte’ province, inquiring if her near-anorexic expression would make the frock justness. After all, she weighed at least two rock heavier at the clip of the movie ( Roberts, 2006 ) . In that sense, so, the frock is really much a merchandise of the civilization in which—and for which—it was created. Ultra-thin had non yet become the fury.
What is it about the safety-pin frock that makes it memorable? The name itself may supply a hint, although a catchy name is non in itself something that is peculiarly memorable. More of import is what the construct of the safety pin represents. In 1849, American Walter Hunt twisted a length of wire and invented what we call today ‘the safety pin ‘ . Hunt called it ‘the miracle fastener ‘ . In some ways, it was for Hunt a spot of a miracle: his original motive for the innovation came from the demand to pay off a debt. The debt—which was $ 15—was settled, and the patent sold finally for $ 400 ( Col, 2005 ) .
Since being discovered, the safety pin has become an indispensable portion of any woman’s closet, nevertheless stylish—or out of style—she may be. Most people can believe of at least one state of affairs in their lives in which a safety pin or two saved the twenty-four hours. As an exigency fix tool, it is easy to utilize and easy to hide. Torn seams, ripped hems, losing buttons—all of these can be temporarily compared or camouflaged in some manner with the aid of that cagey spot of wire. Hence, viewing audiences ofFour Weddings and a Funeralmay hold been inspired to believe of those times when a safety pin saved them from the threshold of manner catastrophe.
Then, excessively, there is the connexion to an alternate life style: the universe of hood. Martin asserts that ‘Versace takes the safety pin of first-generation-punk disfiguration in new directions’ ( 2005 ) . For Versace, the safety pin acquires new significance as a symbol ; this symbol seems to stand for the procedure of creative activity itself. Yet Martin besides sees the usage of—and looking profanation of—the sari as symbolic. Whereas some might see the usage of safety pins as a coming together of parts, his position is the opposite: ‘Versace ‘s barbarous cleaving of the saree in the mode that reflects a youth cultural esthesia two decennaries removed is surely a consummate presentation of design-room possibility’ ( 2005 ) . The pins, Martin notes, are non to make the garment, but to mend it. In this manner, asserts Martin, ‘Versace simulates the dress-making procedure besides literally gilding one of hood ‘s virulent antibourgeois tokens – turning it into a bourgeois plus, gilded jewellery: Sexual activity Pistols, meet Bulgari’ ( Martin 2005 ) .
Speculating along these same lines, Vergine posits that the organic structure has progressively become a kind of canvas for artistic statement. The body-as-canvas has been used by a figure of creative persons, Vergine asserts, all of whom represent a broad scope of inclinations and a assortment of techniques, civilizations, and minds. Still, there are common features in this sort of art ; no affair what the art signifier, these commonalties can be seen. Again, here, we see the subjects of pandemonium and control, and the ceaseless conflict between the two for domination, or ‘a refusal to let the sense of world to occupy and command the domain of the emotions, and a romantic rebellion against dependance upon both people and things ‘ ( Vergine, 2000: p. 1 ) .
The Life of Gianni Versace
‘The Britss have a alone captivation with Versace’ , notes Goldstein, asseverating that this is partially due to the inevitable clang between the two: ‘The stereotype of the house — bold, brassy and tacky — goes against the stereotype of the polite and reserved British. When the two mix, headlines are made ‘ ( Goldstein, 2002 ) .
In 1946, interior decorator Gianni Versace was literally ‘born ‘ into manner: his female parent was a modiste, and he seemingly followed in her footfalls: he designed his first frock at the age of nine ( ‘Designer ‘ , 2002 ) . With no formal preparation, he entered the universe of manner on his ain footings, and finally grew to be a top interior decorator whose clients included royalty such as Princess Diana, and supermodels such as Naomi Campbell. He besides built a multimillion-dollar imperium, which included his ain label every bit good as eight separate lines. His dream-house, Casa Casuarina, was really a sign of the zodiac located on the ocean in Miami, Florida. Unfortunately, it was besides the site of his tragic decease in 1997. The Versace line of vesture has been carried on by his sister Donatella ; nevertheless, it has ne’er duplicated the former glorification of the line as it was in the premier old ages of Gianni ‘s originative mastermind ( Orth, 1999: pp. 303–312 & A ; 334–339 ; ‘Designer ‘ , 2002 ) .
On the inside screen of Versace’s volume,Rock and Royalty,appear these words: ‘Gianni Versace is an aesthete, in hunt of the kernel of beauty, which he captures with grace and easiness. From the optimism that shines from the pages of this book one can state that he loves mankind… ‘ This testimonial from Diana, the Princess of Wales, indicates something about the society circles Versace made himself at place in. Subscribers to the volume include such leading lights as Richard Avedon, Cher, Annie Leibovitz, k.d. lang, Madonna, Luciano Pavarotti, Prince, Sting, and Tina Turner.
Yet despite his ain captivation with flashiness and glamor, his outrageously uncovering and risque outfits, and his by and large showy manner, there was much more to the adult male than many—to this day—know about the interior decorator. A intimation of this appears inside the screen ofRock and Royaltyas good: ‘Royalties from the sale of this book will be donated to The Elton John AIDS Foundation ‘ . Was this a beneficent run of this originative and showy adult male? Or was this part to the fund that would assist contend the spread of AIDS due to his ain alleged conflict with the virus?
Mason, in his review of the Versace Exhibit at the V. & A ; A. , points out that each garment contained rich nuggets of text which informed the witness of Versace’s ‘historically and visually knowledgeable’ background. There were mentions to a diverseness of civilizations, from the Ancient Greeks to the autochthonal peoples of the Americas to the flowery period of Italian Baroque. In add-on, as a craftsman he was experienced every bit good as experimental, ‘stretching the possibilities of printed cloth and stuffs to new bounds ‘ ( Mason, 2005 ) .
And it remains true to this twenty-four hours that—as Argent points out—celebrities who dress in Versace creative activities invite public involvement ; they know they will be scrutinised, and they tribunal it. Furthermore, she notes, ‘to put it merely: Versace ne’er has done or will make “ dull ” ‘ ( 2005 ) . Clearly, the interior decorator will ever be remembered for, among other things, the creative activity of The Dress. Thus, the safety-pin dress—and its unforgettable and gifted designer—are settled safely into their ain niche of manner history.
Argent, Kitty. 2005. ‘Viva Versace ‘ .
Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.handbag.com/fashion/designer/versace/
Brassett, J. 2005. ‘entropy ( manner ) and outgrowth ( forging ) ‘ . Pp. 197–209 inMannerand Modernity,explosive detection systems. Breward, C. and Evans, C. New York: Berg.
Col, Jeananda. 2005. ‘Safety Pin ‘ .
hypertext transfer protocol: //www.enchantedlearning.com/inventors/page/s/safetypin.shtml
‘Designer ‘ . 2002.
Retrieved on May 5, 2006, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.kunstwissen.de/fach/fkuns/mode/mode16.htm
Entwistle, Joanne. 2000.The Fashioned Body: Manner, Dress, and Modern Social
Theory.Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goldstein, Lauren. 2002. ‘Fame Trumps Fashion: Celebrity is in grounds at museum.Time Europe: The Fashion Issue.Sunday, Oct. 20, 2002.
Jones, S. 2002.Manner Design.London: Laurence King Printing Ltd.
Martin, Richard. 2005. Gianni Versace.Art Forum International10/1/1995.
Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.highbeam.com/library/docfree.asp? DOCID=
1G1:17520466 & A ; ctrlInfo=Round19 % 3AMode19b % 3ADocG % 3AResult & A ; ao=
Mason, Liz. 2005. ‘Exhibition Reappraisal: The Art and Craft of Gianni Versace ‘ .
Manner Theory, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 85–88.
Orth, Maureen. 1999.Coarse Favors: Andrew Cunanan, Gianni Versace, and the LargestFailed Manhunt in U.S. History.New York: Delacorte Press.
Roberts, Rachel. 2006. ‘Flattering Fashion ‘ fromiBeauty.Retrieved from
hypertext transfer protocol: //www.ivillage.co.uk/beauty/bodybasics/style/articles/0, ,643584_643628,00.html
Vergine, Lea. 2000.Body Art and Performance: The Body as Language.Milan, Italy: Skira.
Versace, Gianni. n.d.Rock and Royalty.New York, NY: Abbeville Press.