Multicultural instruction programme is aimed to develop the cognition about diverse civilizations, therefore the writer of this Bachelor thesis focuses her attending on this topic. Non-verbal communicating should be understood non merely with the linguistic communication of manus or facial looks but besides when a individual speaks: oculus contact, smiling, pauses in address and the distance between middlemans every bit good as other factors are of import. Sen argues that ‘in the context of multicultural communicating, it becomes imperative that we train ourselves in decrypting the non-verbal marks in a communicating advancement ‘ ( 2004: 163 ) .
Clayton suggests that non-verbal communicating should be discussed in three countries, ‘related to the person, to linguistic communication, and to the context ‘ ( 2003: 115 ) . Non-verbal communicating related to an single involves “ oculus contact ” , “ touching ” , “ position ” , “ gestures ” and “ facial looks ” ( ibid. : 115-118 ) . Non-verbal communicating related to linguistic communication includes “ vocal qualities ” , “ modulation ” , and “ the usage of silence ” ( ibid. : 119 ) . The last one, non-verbal communicating related to the context is discussed by “ smell ” , “ vesture ” , “ sonal visual aspect ” , “ artefacts ” every bit good as “ experiencing approximately infinite ” and “ attitudes toward clip ” ( ibid. : 120-123 ) .
Some people believe that words are most of import in address because sometimes they do non detect how of import non-verbal communicating could be and that it can state more about person than words. The individual can lie when he is talking but his behaviour as for case, embarrassment, ever tells the truth.
The rules of non-verbal communicating between representatives of different civilizations can assist to get the better of the incomprehension even without the cognition of linguistic communication. Discoursing oculus contact one should detect that it is the tool for contact constitution. In concern field the direct oculus contact means a sense of assurance.
However, the writer of the research believes that Russians do non prefer to repair oculus contact for a long clip. In American civilization frailty versa it is the manner how people normally behave. Harmonizing to Clayton, ‘direct eye-contact implies truth and honestness in the dominant Anglo-American civilization ‘ ( ibid. : 115 ) .
Another important facet of non-verbal communicating is gestures. Feyereisen and de Lannoy quotation mark Kendon ( 1986 ) and McNeill ( 1985 ) , ‘ [ aˆ¦ ] gestures and words both relate to the mental representations that constitute believing ‘ ( Feyereisen and de Lannoy, 1991: 2 ) . Persons of diverse civilizations can construe some cosmopolitan gestures otherwise. When one thinks about the word “ yes ” or “ no ” it means “ nodding ” and “ shaking ” the caput. ( Clayton, 2003: 117 ) Still in some states, for case in India or Bulgaria, the gesture “ no ” means the understanding ( ibid. : 117 ) .
From these illustrations of gestures ‘ use it can be seen how otherwise communities can construe the significance. Further, within a multicultural environment, every civilization forms a individual impression of established manners, salutations, gestures and handshakings ‘ usage.
It is really frequently considered that a certain state can utilize gestures more often than others. The writer of the present research provides an illustration from the respondents ‘ replies ( see Appendix 2 ; inquiry nr. 11 ) , one Latvian pupil wrote, ‘usually Russian people within speaking use many gestures ‘ . This type of behaviour can confound diverse civilizations ‘ representatives where the active usage of gestures is non welcome. Latvians, for case, do non prefer to utilize a batch of gestures in their unwritten discourse, particularly with aliens. A direct oculus contact and externally restrained behaviour are the most characteristic characteristics for them. They besides do non prefer to smile rapidly recognizing other individuals.
It is of import to analyse how representatives of different civilizations behave being in one group. Some aliens, for case, Americans or Italians being in Latvia could be confused with the type of unfriendly behaviour of native people. Americans and Italians ever smile recognizing others but this could be untypical for the indigens of other states.
The writer knows from her ain experience that Russians in Latvia differ from Russians in Russia particularly by usage of gestures. This signals that being in one group or populating together in one state [ Russians in Latvia ] affects all those indigens non merely following the pick of words or sentence forms from the Latvian civilization, but besides behavior, gestures and attitudes.
To sum up, Russians in Latvia are more composed in behaviour than Russians in Russia. It is typical for them in Russia to utilize a batch of gestures that are accompanied sometimes by a loud voice and really fast speaking. Russians in Latvia were being socialized to the typical cultural behaviour of Latvians. The procedure of version of some characteristics of non-verbal communicating is developed since representatives of civilizations ever cooperate and affect each other being in one group.
Feyereisen and de Lannoy quotation mark Halliday ( 1973 ) and Levinson ( 1983 ) ‘pragmatics besides draws attending to the societal conditions in which gestures occur ‘ ( Feyereisen and de Lannoy, 1991: 24 ) . ‘The context of the verbal emanation, gestures included, must be taken into history to understand the significance of vocalization ” ( ibid. ) . Therefore, every gesture occurs in appropriate context and conditions. As an illustration, Asians ever smile when they are embarrassed. They normally demonstrate a impersonal look when angry, that makes impossible to understand their emotional status. American people ever keep smiling in order to demo that everything is traveling good.
The consciousness of cultural differences in non-verbal communicating leads to understanding the behaviour of other people. However, it is sometimes hard to happen a manner how it is better to move.
The above-named suggestions are considered to be really of import and everyone should understand that if person behaves otherwise and sometimes incomprehensibly this can intend that he/she is coming from another civilization.
Clayton reasoning about pupils ‘ gestural communicating differences in the schoolroom, asserts that
[ aˆ¦ ] the volume of a pupil ‘s response may be a mark of earnestness ; the belligerent-sounding remark may be awkward modulation ; [ aˆ¦ ] the quest for more personal interaction may bespeak an unconscious demand for closer contact with authorization ; the wince under our fond rap on the dorsum may intend uncomfortableness with physical touch ; [ aˆ¦ ] an “ inappropriate ” smiling may dissemble shame, embarrassment, or fear [ aˆ¦ ] ( 2003: 128 ) .
Finally, everyone should be more attentive to others in order to pass on successfully ; particularly it is of import during the procedure of instruction. Clayton adds that instructors can non cognize all gestural linguistic communications of other civilizations but she assumes that what we can make is ‘ [ aˆ¦ ] to put aside our ain cultural winkers, be sensitive to a assortment of responses, be unfastened to and confirming of different readings, and hopefully learn from our pupils [ aˆ¦ ] ‘ ( ibid. ) .
To reason the writer of the research would wish to stress that:
the consciousness of cross-cultural differences leads to acceptance over civilizations ;
the single becomes more open-minded ;
the ability to construe cross-cultural differences and utilize this cognition in pattern aids to move in a positive manner ;