The Events Of September 11 Management Essay

After the events of September 11, 2001, supply concatenation security has been recognized as an of import portion of pull offing concern hazard. Firms have implemented supply concatenation security initiatives to cut down the hazard associated with a broad scope of supply concatenation exposures.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

Supply concatenation security involves more than larceny and smuggling and includes the possible impact of a supply concatenation break which may ensue from either an knowing or unwilled incident. Harmonizing to a recent survey, % 69 of CFOs surveyed stipulate that supply concatenation breaks caused by a supply concatenation security failure are the major menace to gross beginnings ( Elkins et al. , 2005 ) . Hendricks and Singhal ( 2003 ) found an proclamation of a supply concatenation break causes a % 10 lessening in stockholder value, on the topographic point. Hendricks and Singhal ( 2005 ) besides found that houses that experienced a break had an mean return of about – % 40 over three twelvemonth period bespeaking that negative fiscal effects of a break are non merely immediate but besides linger. In add-on to fiscal effects, loss of consumer assurance in a house ‘s trade name and consumer safety and merchandise liability are other drivers of enhanced security enterprises ( Voss et al. , 2009 ) . Sheffi ( 2001 ) argues that a supply concatenation is merely every bit strong as its weakest nexus bespeaking that the internal security enterprises taken by a member in the supply concatenation are potentially nullified by the deficiency of security attempts taken by another and weak coordination among spouses. Voss et Al. ( 2009 ) suggest that houses have to follow both internal and external security enterprises in order to guarantee complete supply concatenation security coverage.

Supply Chain Security?

Closs and McGarrell ( 2004 ) defines Supply Chain Security ( SCS ) as ‘the application of policies, processs, and engineering to protect supply concatenation assets ( merchandise, installations, equipment, information, and forces ) from larceny, harm, or terrorist act and to forestall the debut or unauthorised contraband, people or arms of mass devastation into the supply concatenation ” . This indicates that both, merchandises go forthing and contraband come ining the SC, affair and should be protectied against.

Williams et Al. ( 2008 ) postulate that SCS is really a subcomponent of SC hazard direction scheme. Pfohl et Al. ( 2010 ) supply a list of hazard relevant concept including hazard and security and a model that shows the relationship between them ( Fig 1 ) .

Supply concatenation hazard direction is “ the designation and direction of hazards for the supply concatenation, through a co-ordinated attack amongst supply concatenation members, to cut down exposure as a whole ” ( JuA?ttner et al. , 2003, p. 201 ) .

Juttner et Al. ( 2003 ) place four of import concepts in SC hazard direction viz. :

Risk resources,

Hazard drivers of SC scheme,

SC hazard direction schemes and

Result of SC hazard

Risk beginning is a variable which can non be exactly predicted and can take to a SC break. Accidents, natural catastrophes and socio-political actions are three beginnings of hazard. Juttner et Al. ( 2003 ) count the undermentioned points as the major drivers of SC hazard:

A stronger focal point on efficiency instead than on effectivity ;

SC globalisation ;

Focused mills and centralised distribution ;

Increased outsourcing ; and

Supply base decrease.

SC hazard direction schemes refer to the activities that can decrease the overall hazard degree. Williams ( 2008 ) suggests that exposure and break are two results of SC hazard direction. Vulnerability is defined as exposure of SC to something that could upset it. As hazard additions, organisations become more vulnerable to SC breaks.


Hazards might take to disturbance within the supply concatenation. Literally, perturbation can be defined as ”the break and interrupting up of repose, peace, remainder, or settled status ” . Those might attest themselves by fluctuation in demand, default of bringing, or quality alterations. They normally lead to negative impacts for a limited period and parametric quantity merely and can be prevented by steps such as buffers.


Literally, break is defined as ”the action of riping or spliting asunder ; violent disintegration of continuity ; physical severance. ” . Sphere of action and continuance of consequence are graver than in the instance of perturbation. Examples are work stoppages at cardinal places of international trade, changes of political fortunes, or natural catastrophes, which are interconnected with considerable fiscal harm.


Security emphasizes the security of companies, systems, and the public sector with respect to keeping a coveted status. In the context of a supply concatenation, imposts clearance of ocean cargo, completion of coverage contracts to procure liquidness in the instance of liability, or ongoing ability to present after terrorist onslaughts are to be mentioned in this context. Supply concatenation security can hence be characterized as the protection of the supply concatenation against onslaughts and perturbation with a condemnable purpose, or as an wake of juridical effects in the instance of liability and prolongation of the companies under those sorts of fortunes.


In contrast, literally, safety is defined as ”the province of being safe ; freedom from injury or hurt ; freedom from danger ” . In this context, it is more about the personal safety of a individual or unit against a distinguishable menace in the sense of operating safety. Examples refer to treat safety, environment and wellness, or exigency stocks. With respect to transport, transport safety in the sense of ”safety ” can be characterized as protection against menaces that originate from conveyance itself and impact transported goods, agencies of conveyance, every bit good as the environment.


Resilience refers to the ability of an organisation to rapidly travel back to a functioning initial province after perturbation, viz. the ability ”to bounciness back from adversity ” . This behaviour can be seen as an analogy to the behaviour of elastic stuff exposed to utmost force per unit area. In order to give vocalization to the necessary term of flexibleness that is implied by resilient, the term will be understood as synonymous to agile at the same clip.

Approachs to SCS

Harmonizing Ekwal ( 2012 ) current SCS research outlines several alterations for how security in a supply concatenation should be approached. First, SCS should take into history non merely theft bar but besides anti-terrorism steps. Second, the accent is presently on planetary issues and non merely local or national issues. Third, when developing eventuality program, the construct of crisis direction should be addressed in order to accomplish better resiliency. Last, security is non an internal corporate issue any more but instead a inquiry for all supply concatenation members.

Williams ( 2008 ) identifies four organisational attacks to SCS in the literature that can be incorporated into SCS schemes to forestall and retrieve from supply concatenation breaches. Intraorganizational attack involves all activities that an organisation performs and controls within the organisation to procure the SC. Ritter et Al. ( 2007 ) argue that an organisation needs internal dedication for making first-class SCS steps. The interorganizational position is the procedure by which all other organisations within the concatenation cooperate to present value to the terminal client. It has been argued that the lone manner to win is join forcesing SCS with others ( Knight, 2003 ) peculiarly with upstream and downstream supply concatenation members ( Sheffi, 2005b ) and the authorities ( Closs and McGarrell, 2004 ) . Sheffi ( 2001 ) argues that SCS can besides be established through non sharing excessively much proprietary information with spouses, take downing the provider base, pull offing stock list in a cardinal location and collaborating with the authorities and rivals. Finally some houses prefer non to follow security attempts because they can non warrant the costs of SCS attempts and they instead choose to speculate that their supply ironss will non be violated. Rice and Spayd ( 2005 ) found that taking planetary shippers and bearers have demonstrated few to no security attempts. These houses believe that an onslaught to the supply concatenation will impact all houses every bit which makes following SCS pointless.

Gould et Al. ( 2010 ) place five emerging strategic attacks in the literature for covering with security menaces. The first scheme is more coordination among spouses within supply concatenation to be after and command security steps ( Autry and Bobbitt 2008 ) . Continuous flow of information about stock list degrees, demand degrees and current supply is one attack suggested in the literature to screen the supply concatenation against supply concatenation breaks ( Martha and Subbakrishna 2002 ) . The 2nd scheme is sing attachment to security ordinances as a model for security ( Kern 2007 ) and a agency to pass on a SCS related activities with providers and clients ( Autry and Bobbitt 2008 ) . A 3rd attack is a reorganisation of logistics operations of repositing, production, and conveyance procedures ( Macpherson and McConnell 2007 ; Vance 2008 ) . Some strategic logistics enterprises could be resettlement of repositing and production installations to diminish trust on abroad sourcing ( Vance, 2008 ) . A 4th scheme to extenuate breaks in the supply concatenation is to construct up flexibleness and resiliency. The demands for flexibleness for SCS were manifested by the involvement in the subject by bookmans and practicians ( Gould et al. , 2010 ) . The last scheme involves making and implementing a “ security civilization ” . Harmonizing to Williams et Al. ( 2009 ) , security civilization “ creates SCS as a precedence among employees through embrace and projecting norms and values that support security-related activities and let employees to be argus-eyed in set abouting SCS-related attempts ” .

Scandium from 2010

Since Williams et Al. ( 2008 ) and Gould et Al. ( 2010 ) have already done a comprehensive literature reappraisal in SCS context ; I have reviewed merely the articles that have been published in and after 2010 in the relevant peered reappraisal diaries. Following the reappraisal I identified the five major countries of research in the literature:

Beginnings of security hazard

Design, solution, and scheme

Effectiveness of SCS

Coordination and efficiency

Organizational civilization

Beginnings of security hazard

The topics under this class include showing major counter menaces ( Ekwall, 2010a and degree Celsius ) , analysis the hazard for counter menaces to happen forms and tendencies ( Ekwall, 2010b ) , designation of the cardinal factors and relation in supply concatenation hazards and security ( Saxena, 2012 ) , happening hazard hot musca volitanss in general ( Zhang et al. , 2011 ) or specific context ( Belzer et al. , 2011 ; Yang, 2011 ; Yoon and Gim, 2012 ) , outsourcing as a beginning of security hazard ( Hamlen and Thuraisingham, 2013 ) and designation of the failure points where security systems can bring forth Type I and Type II mistakes ( Nganje et al. , 2011 ) .

To pull off hazard it is indispensable to understand different types and beginnings of hazard and do put on the line based prioritization. Supply concatenation breaks may deduce from assorted beginnings but the counter menaces are centered in supply concatenation break.

Following his statistical survey Ekwal ( 2010 ) identifies three major beginnings of counter menaces viz. Shrinkage and larceny, Terrorism, Smuggling of goods, and Piracy. Inventory shrinking is the loss of merchandises between the point of fabrication or purchase from provider and the point of sale. Four major beginnings of shrinking are employee larceny, shrinkage, administrative mistake, and seller fraud ( NRSS, 2002 ) , which three of them are condemnable actions. Terrorism is one of the foremost obstructions for meaningful international countermeasures. Survey shows that logistics operations will endure effects of breaks both in short term and long term ( Hendricks and Singhal, 2003, 2005 ) .

Design, solution and scheme

The topics under this class include supplying an overview of available security solutions and developing a model to place weak musca volitanss and related countermeasures in the SC ( Urciuoli, 2010 ) , SCS hazard forestalling plans ( Ekwall, 2010a ) , supplying a model for design of SCS criterions ( Hintsa, 2010 ) , survey of acceptance of security criterions such as ISO on fight of the houses ( Correa Espinal, 2010 ) , and analysis of the resource allotment schemes against an antagonist ( BakA±r, 2001 ) .

Goods moved in distribution ironss incur the hazard for being stolen, counterfeited or contaminated. Besides, panic menaces for smuggling arms of mass devastations, or deliberately altering merchandises, are coercing authoritiess to necessitate higher security from logistics and conveyance operators. Therefore, supply concatenation directors deal with hard undertaking of taking among extended sets of design, solutions and schemes to protect their distribution webs.

Following a comprehensive literature reappraisal and a study Urciuoli ( 2009 ) identifies three major countries of security solutions that may better supply concatenation security. These are Governmental Initiatives, Management Strategies and Operative Routines and Technical Systems ( Figure 2 ) .

Fig 2:

Governmental Enterprises: Several enterprises have been issued by authoritiess around the universe to avoid ruinous effects on society. These security coders address different sides of SCS. The impact of these plans on security and different logistics procedures have been discussed in few documents. While Powanga ( 2006 ) states that the C-TPAT enfranchisement may negatively impact little endeavors pieces big houses alternatively may bear the costs in return of benefits from supply concatenation transparence, Haughton ( 2007 ) shows the economical and competitory advantages for both big and little FAST-approved shippers ( Free And Secure Trade ) .

Management Schemes: are activities that emphasize on SC hazard direction to chair breaks ‘ effects ( Peck 2006 ) . For illustration Asbjornslett ( 2008 ) brings in the impression of supply concatenation hardiness, or resiliency, which refers to the supply ironss degree of opposition against counter onslaughts, adaptability to events and capableness to retrieve to stable conditions. Martens et Al. ( 2011 ) refer to knowledge and treat backup, decentalisation of operations and redundancy as a scheme. Sheffi ( 2001 ) evidenced the importance of double sourcing, dual-manufacturing and dual-inventory to decrease the hazard of breaks. Some writers suggest managerial schemes which are based on cut downing conveyance content, efficient usage of transit and sourcing betterment ( Crone 2006 ) . Lee and Whang ( 2005 ) argue that by utilizing Entire Quality Management ( TQM ) rule, higher security can be realized at lower costs.

Operative Routines and Technical Systems: Operative modus operandis refer to all the operational activities to better the security against counter menaces. Technical systems can mechanise operative and strategic steps through a blend of hardware and package. Sheffi et Al. ( 2003 ) suggest three countries in which technological solutions for preventative and recovery operations have to be employed: physical security, information security and cargo security. Harmonizing to Anderson ( 2007 ) , thorough integrating of specific security modus operandis and technological systems implemented in supply concatenation and logistics direction is of import. Badolato ( 2000 ) argues that development of “ effectual coverage systems, addition penalties, promote apprehension of lading larceny, support lading larceny undertaking forces, encourage jurisprudence enforcement expertness, and follow effectual lading larceny engineering ” requires better coaction among private industries and authoritiess.

Effectiveness of SCS

The topics under this class include developing a theoretical account for measuring of SCS effectivity ( Park et al. , 2011 ) and researching the relationship between security direction patterns, security steps and tools for protecting logistics activities ( Min, 2012 ) and the sensed effectivity of SCS ( Poist, 2011 )

SCS system has become important portion for planetary corporations involved in international trading and surveies on SCS maintain traveling on. While most of the surveies are focused on treatment of system, cost and influence of logistics security, issue of effectivity of supply SCS is pulling the attending of more research workers.

Based upon a reappraisal of the supply concatenation direction literature, Martens et Al. ( 2011 ) place four concept that affect the effectivity of supply concatenation security viz. : ( 1 ) motivational considerations ; ( 2 ) resource restraints ; ( 3 ) internal and external integrating ; and ( 4 ) preparation and measuring.

Motivational considerations: reference why houses should follow security betterment steps and explicate what houses expect to achieve from these enterprises. Firms are prone to a broad scope of possible supply concatenation security breaks. Vulnerability has been defined as the blend of the opportunity that an inauspicious event will happen and the badness of the event ‘s punishment ( Sheffi 2001 ) . Firms have an inducement to put to death security undertakings which cut the chance that an inauspicious event will go on, diminish the badness of the event ‘s punishment, or accomplish both of these aims ( Sheffi and Rice 2005 ) . Freeman states that directors have to fulfill stakeholders who affect a house ‘s success ( Freeman 1984 ) .

Resource restraints: Resource handiness and direction support are two critical factors that impact a house ‘s ability to set about security investings. It is obvious that organisational and human capital affect any type of investing a house will do. All houses must apportion rare resources across viing operational demands and investing chances, including security investings. Security investings are normally at a disadvantage comparative to viing innitiatives because it is hard to gauge and quantify their advantages ( Rice and Caniato 2003 ) . Harmonizing to Kleindorfer and Saad ( 2005 ) , security plans are improved when a high-ranking director is in charge of security planning and execution.

Internal and external integrating: Rice and Caniato ( 2003 ) sort SCS planning as basic and advanced. Basic security planning emphasizes internal operations of the house ( Rice and Caniato 2003 ) . Although many houses may comprehend that internal security does much to increase supply concatenation security, Rice and Caniato ( 2003 ) suggest that houses besides focus on external exposures. Planing for exposures that occur outside of steadfast operations needs more supply concatenation coordination. Turning literature argue that supply concatenation coaction is a necessary component of SCS planning ( Tang 2006 ) .

Training and measuring: Management procedures and activities specify how houses run and operate supply concatenation security plans and signifier civilizations supportive of supply concatenation security. Activities involved in the execution and operations of security vary from basic to progress ( Rice and Caniato 2003 ) . Advanced security activities acknowledged in the literature include investings in employee preparation and showing ( Williams et al. 2008 ) , robust appraisals of supply concatenation spouses ( Rice and Caniato 2003 ) , and improved sensing ( Sheffi 2005 ) .

Coordination and efficiency

The topics under this class include suggest a determination procedure that features a set of security regulations and a multi-objective optimisation theoretical account for carry throughing intra-firm every bit good as inter-firm coaction ( Meixell et al. , 2012 ) , analyzing coordination jobs and matching incentive mechanisms for jointly puting in a new engineering for bettering supply concatenation security ( Lee et al. , 2011 ) , empirical survey of the impact of information engineering on efficiency and security as opposing factors in conveyance operations ( Sternberg et al. , 2012 )

Logisticss determinations associating to security in the supply concatenation will be made more efficient when made in coordination with determinations in related supply concatenation procedures. Indeed, directors can minimise cost, theodolite clip, and security hazard by incorporating determination processes internally, every bit good as with their bearer ‘s and provider ‘s operations.

Gentry ( 1996 ) states that if all parties in the inbound supply concatenation co-operate the result would increase operating efficiency. Narsoo et Al. ( 2009 ) raise the demand for improved structural modus operandis every bit good as better usage of information and communicating engineerings ( ICT ) to heighten the handling and clearance of goods. Coronado et Al. ( 2009 ) besides address the usage of ICT to supply end-to-end visibleness, increase lading and port security, and supply paperless information flows.

Organizational civilization

The topics under this class include analysis of the security facets of corporate civilization among people within the web ( Ekwall and Rolandsson, 2012 ) and appraisal of the degree of usage and the utility of cultural and organisational tools within supply concatenation ( Cigolini et al, 2012 ) .

SCS is the application of policies, processs and engineerings to protect supply ironss from larceny, amendss or terrorist act. The function of human factor in SCS is obvious and has been widely recognized in the literature, nevertheless the research worker have late started to pay attending to cultural and organisational tools as a mean to better SCS in field.

In this respect, the interface between SCS and organisational behaviour issues has received the most attending. Autry and Bobbitt ( 2008 ) studied the employees ‘ orientation toward SCS issues in their day-to-day undertakings and found that houses with SCS-oriented employees may profit from several organisational public presentation advantages. This supports other research workers statements sing the importance of human attitudes, HR patterns, and other employee-level effects on the creative activity of a security-focused supply concatenation direction ( SCM ) environment ( Sheffi, 2005a ) . Williams et Al. ( 2008 ) in their survey province that a cardinal success factor for SCS is making and back uping an organisational civilization that understands the importance of security to concern operations.

Williams et Al. ( 2009 ) argues that although the development of a supply concatenation security civilization ( SCSC ) is critical ( because of increasing focal point that authoritiess are puting on SCS, and besides the impact of civilization on strategic, operational, and tactical house and supply concatenation ends ) , research turn toing SCSC is presently hampered by a comparative deficiency of measuring graduated tables.


U?O±OµO? O?O­U‚U?U‚

SCS tendency ( 13 )

[ 99 ] Sweet, K. ( 2006 ) , Transportation and Cargo security. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

[ 83 ] Hesseling, R. ( 1994 ) , “ Supplanting: A reappraisal of the empirical literature ” . In, Clarke, R. ( ed. ) Crime bar surveies, Vol 3, pp. 197-230. Monsey, NY: Condemnable Justice Press.

[ 13 ] NRSS ( 2002 ) , National Retail Security Survey. University of Florida

[ 29 ] Johnston, R. B. and Nedelescu, O. M. ( 2006 ) , “ The impact of terrorist act on fiscal markets ” . Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 7-25

[ 42 ] Naylor, R ( 2004 ) , Wages of offense. Cornell University Press. Ithaca.

[ 44 ] Jannati, F. and Salimi, M. ( 2011 ) Modern Sea buccaneering – Modus operandi and economical and

development province backgrounds. School of Engineering, University of Boras, Sweden

[ 45 ] Abeyratne R ( 2010 ) Pull offing the 21st century buccaneering menace. In: Thomas A ( erectile dysfunction )

Supply concatenation security, Vol. 1. ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara

[ 46 ] Sullivan, A. ( 2010 ) , “ Piracy in the Horn of Africa and its effects on the planetary supply

concatenation ” . Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 231-243

[ 47 ] Onuoha. F, C, ( 2009 ) , “ Sea buccaneering and nautical security in the Horn of Africa: The

Somali seashore and Gulf of Aden in position ” . African Security Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3,

pp. 31-44

[ 48 ] Madden, M. ( 2009 ) , “ Trading the Shield of Sovereignty for the Scales of Justice: Angstrom

Proposal for Reform of International Sea Piracy Laws ” . University of San Francisco

Maritime Law Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 139-166.

[ 110 ] Powanga, L. ( 2006 ) , “ A concern position of US International Seaborne Security

Measures: Impact on Importers ” . Journal of Global Business, Vol. 33, pp.63-75

[ 111 ] Haughton, M.A. ( 2007 ) , “ Analyzing the concern instance for shipper engagement in

Canada USA trade security programmes ” . International Journal of Logistics Research and

Applications, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp.315-331

[ 112 ] Willys, H.H. and Ortiz, D.S. ( 2004 ) . “ Measuring the Security of the Global

Containerized Supply Chain, ” RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.


I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out