Among post-Soviet brotherhood states, Kyrgyzstan has been considered as the first state to take stairss towards democratisation, public disposal, and decentalisation reform ( Intrac, 2011 ) . Those issue which perceived as planetary has forced even for freshly independence state like Kyrgyzstan to take portion and take part in the air current of democratisation as a means to beef up planetary relationship among states. Main treatment about democratic signifiers of administration is closely related with demand for decentralised authorities. In this instance, decentalisation could be in the signifier of deconcentration, degeneration, and deputation. Each state has their ain manner in implementing those signifiers depending on their local capacity, capableness, and resources. Delegating service execution to the lower of degrees of authorities is a pattern of subordinateness rule and baronial purpose that this pattern would profit general citizen as a whole in footings of effectual and efficient public service bringing, non to advert besides efficient allotment of economic resources ( Norris and Wade, 2002 ) .
Previously, Kyrgyzstan interbudgetary relation was inherited by the former Soviet Union system. Although it was a communist state, where cardinal authorities played a individual and dominant function in the whole facet of disposal, seems that it implemented Soviet manner of decentalisation. Taranchieva noted that gross distribution that assign national and local authorities to roll up revenue enhancement and portions of national revenue enhancement to local authorities ( oblast, rayon, metropolis, small town, township ) was implemented in Kyrgyzstan. As stated before, the system retain the rules of integrity and centralism as former Soviet Union did. The state of affairs where the function of local authorities was limited merely to sing, O.K.ing, and implementing their budget. Or in other words top down budget without the interaction between cardinal and local authorities Unity in this instance means that all budget included in the province budget system are in the control of cardinal authorities and the budget design and execution is the contemplation of cardinal authorities development policy. Centralism means that the formation of local budgets, the finding of gross beginnings, and other budget policy affairs were decided by the cardinal authorities. As the effect, local budgets do non reflect its ain fiscal state of affairs alternatively in the favour of cardinal governments, and besides they do non further local functionaries to supply services needed by the communities ( Taranchieva, 2007 ) .
Government Strategies Related With Decentralization
To get by with the state of affairs, the authorities originate The National Strategy on Decentralization and Local Governance up to 2010, approved by presidential decree no. 381
of December 17, 2002, stipulates that by 2010, by agencies of decentalisation reforms and
the development of local administration ( which will necessitate reforming the state ‘s
internal administrative divisions ) , the local governments will profit from decentralized
non merely in deputation of governments but besides fiscal flows, and will hold their right to make up one’s mind their ain scheme to present better service to citizen which is reflected on their budget. Several schemes has been set by the authorities in order to back up the reforms such as: Unified
processs for planing and O.K.ing local budgets will be introduced, having the crystalline direction of all local authorities fiscal and economic activities, Local authoritiess are to independently pull off their ain budget grosss, based on revenue enhancement grosss and transportations from higher-level budgets, outgo authorization will be clearly differentiated by budget degrees and besides “ Budgeting by consequences ” will be introduced, in order to measure budget indexs
and assure effectual usage of budget monies ( Taranchieva, 2007 ) .
Make the Strategy Effective Enough to Foster Decentralization?
The message from presidential edict no. 381 is clear that the authorities fundamentally wants to present better service to general citizens and accordingly better general public assistance. Staying inquiries would be whether the execution of such edict is effectual or non. Several Kyrgyzstan bookman have criticize the spread between what has been stated in the edict and the realisation in Kyrgyzstan decentalisation patterns during the period of 2002 until 2010. Taranchieva ( 2007 ) stated that there is a inclination that local governments are easy influenced by the determinations of the national authorities or in other words they are non independence in pull offing their ain authorities. Alternatively of moving as independent entities which responds to local community demands, they act as agents of cardinal province disposal. Furthermore related statute laws do non explicitly explain the function of local authorities governmental bureaus. For illustration the mechanism to promote interaction and engagement of local communities in policymaking or development scheme. In add-on, what the authorities perceived as “ Decentralization ” is still questionable whether the state has decentralized signifier of administration or its still in centralized from. Decentralization in theory involves non merely the outgo and gross assignments but besides widening subnational policymaking liberty. In Kyrgyzstan instance, although the subnational authoritiess has the authorization to pull off their ain gross and outgo, cardinal authorities retain the authorization to command local authorities through such as budget blessing, and commanding financial policies of subnational authoritiess through grants and transportation ( Tashbaeva, 2011 ) . This grants or transportations though they need rational computation based on specific status of local authoritiess, in world transform into a powerful tool to command subnational authorities in favour of cardinal authorities political involvement. Another bookman, Akmatova ( 2008 ) contended that the major jobs of decentalisation job in Kyrgyzstan are related with the weak capacity of Kyrgyz authorities to find support precedences, established an effectual and efficient system, deficiency of transparence and lucidity in resource allotment.
Major discovery of authorities stairss toward the execution of 2002-2010 scheme would be the execution of two tier budget in 2007 ( Figure 1 ) . This system would split the budget into cardinal budget and local authorities budget, cut downing the function of oblast and rayon in footings of budget system. This pattern followed by other related ordinances which in kernel deputing governments from cardinal to local authorities in footings of service bringing would at least bespeak the authorities purpose to carry on decentalisation for the benefit of general citizens.
Post Period of Government Strategy, Toward Centralization or Decentralization?
In world, there have been less beginnings sing what happened in Kyrgyzstan after 2010 in footings of decentalisation, whether it approached its end in the 2002-2010 or even worst nearing former Soviet Union system which is centralisation. What we can detect is that, given by the above statements by Kyrgyzstan bookman, the state ‘s decentalisation procedure was non every bit smooth as we think. Datas from World Bank site showed that, the state suffered from serious economic jobs during 2007 until 2011. Decreasing per centum of GDP, dead unemployment rate, diminishing export growing are economic indexs that the citizen public assistance were far from world. Despite many factors that could explicate such world such as political altering configuration, one possible reply might be that the baronial intent of decentalisation which is increasing general citizen public assistance has non reached its ends yet. It is true that general citizen public assistance is a long term procedure within a state, but how come we could anticipate a good mark if in short term there are no positive marks toward the improvement of citizen public assistance?
In footings of authorities purpose to implement decentalisation, Kyrgyzstan really has sufficient ordinances. What might impede the procedure would be the capacity, credibleness, and besides unity, from all facet of authoritiess including cardinal and local authorities functionaries including politicians. Changing in national leader normally followed by altering in national scheme in favour of their ain involvements. This state of affairs makes the state hard to concentrate on their long term scheme besides divine authorities functionaries to make the same thing. Degree of corruptness increased as the degree of decentalisation increased. In add-on, many authorities functionaries were non capable plenty in footings of cognition and accomplishment that makes the procedure of decentalisation were non in the right way.
The inquiry is, whether there is still a hope for “ on the path ” decentalisation procedure in Kyrgyzstan? The reply is “ yes ” . The state have enacted encouraging ordinances in relation with decentalisation, this means that at least it has way, it has loyal and selfless authorities functionaries and politician. It has citizens who are willing to alter their life into a better 1. Furthermore, there are several international organisation which voluntary behaviors plans to further democratisation and decentalisation. Those organisations such as UNDP, World Bank, European Union, and many others are systematically presenting their aid to Kyrgyzstan ( Figure 2 ) . Combination of all those factors would be a singular power for the realisation of sustainable democratisation and decentalisation in Kyrgyzstan.
Inflation ( CPI )
Foreign direct investing
% of GDP
Current history balance
% of GDP
Entire debt service
Cash excess or shortage
% of GDP
% of GDP
% of GDP
Public expnd. on edu.
% of GDP
Public expnd. on wellness
% of GDP
R & A ; D outgo
% of GDP
% of GDP
Figure 1: Krygyzstan Economic Indicator ( Beginning: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2011 | International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) , World Economic Outlook 2011 | Stockholm International Pease Research Institute ( SIPRI ) , Military Outgo Database 2011 ) .
Figure 2: Timeline of Donor Support Program ( beginning: Intrac, 2011 )