The Criminal Justice System Using Rehabilitation Programs Criminology Essay

The United States imprisonment rate increased during the periods 1975 to 2009 due to diminish in employment. From 1925 to 1975, United States prison incarcerated rate was about 100 out of every 100,000 people ( Western, 2007 ) . The entire captivity rate exceeded 700 per 100,000, which equated to 2.1 million inmates when inmates of local gaols were counted in the penal population in 2005 ( Western, 2007 ) . The captivity rate increased in 1980 from about 140 out of 100,000 to 500 per 100,000 in 2008 ( Bureau of Justice, 2008 ) ( See Figure 1 ) .

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

Relatively, for the first clip in about 40 old ages, the figure of province captives in the United States has declined. The study informations compiled by the Public Safety Performance Project of the Pew Center on the States, in partnership with the Association of State Correctional Administrators, indicate that as of January 1, 2010, there were 1,404,053 individuals under the legal power of province prison governments, 4,777 ( 0.3 per centum ) fewer than there were on December 31, 2008. This marks the first year-to-year bead in the province prison population since 1972.

In this period, nevertheless, the state ‘s entire prison population increased by 2,061 people because of a leap in the figure of inmates under the legal power of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The federal count rose by 6,838 captives, or 3.4 per centum in 2009, to an all-time high of 208,118.

The Pew Charitable Trust Public Safety Performance Project 2007 estimates the state ‘s province and federal prisons figure to increase to more than 1.7 million by the terminal of 2011, a 13 per centum addition. This addition is more than 192,000 from 2006 ( PCTPSP ) . The Bureau of Prison ( BOP ) expects additions of at least 7,000 per twelvemonth in FY 2010 and FY 2011. It undertakings at least 4,500 net new inmates each twelvemonth after 2011. The BOP ‘s current population of 208,477 is expected to increase to over 222,000 by the terminal of financial twelvemonth 2011 ( BOP ) .

The Pew Charitable Trust Public Safety Performance Project 2007 undertakings the state ‘s population, by comparing to turn by 4.5 per centum in that clip. The survey is the first of its sort to project prison populations in every province through 2011, based on province projections, current condemnable justness policies, and demographic tendencies. With the rise in the prison population, it could be the taxpayers around $ 27.5 billion dollars over the following five old ages.

The U.S. Department of Justice Federal Prison System FY2011 Performance undertakings inmate attention and plans cost to be $ 2,382,820,000. These costs include inmate nutrient, medical attention, institutional and release vesture, public assistance services, transit, tips, staff wages ( including wages of Health Resources and Services Administration commissioned officers ) , and operational costs of maps straight related to supplying inmate attention. Unusually, 13 provinces now devote more than $ 1 billion a twelvemonth in general financess to their corrections systems. The unchallenged leader is California, where disbursement totaled $ 8.8 billion last twelvemonth. Even when adjusted for rising prices that represents a 216 per centum addition over the sum California spent on corrections 20 old ages earlier. The governor signed a measure authorising another $ 7.9 billion in disbursement, through lease gross bonds, for 53,000 more prison and gaol beds last twelvemonth.

Texas, with a somewhat larger figure of inmates, ranks a distant second in disbursement, puting approximately $ 3.3 billion last twelvemonth. State corrections disbursement figures are from the most recent informations available from the National Association of State Budget Officers ( NASBO ) .

The California Legislative Analysis Office estimated the one-year cost to house an inmate in 2008/2009 was $ 47,000. Since 2000-01, the mean one-year cost has increased by about $ 19,500. Inmate lodging in 2011 is $ 86,000, based on the mean one-year cost addition. While the Florida Department of Corrections provinces it costs $ 20,108 per twelvemonth to maintain an inmate in prison in financial old ages 2007/2008. The California Legislative Analysis Office and Florida Department of Corrections reported the day-to-day cost to imprison an inmate in a major prison is spent on security and medical services. The staying 20 % or so is for feeding, vesture and educating inmates, and some administrative issues.

In a society where condemnable rates are on the rise, many inquiries need replies refering an person ‘s mentality when he commits such offenses. Within this condemnable justness system, the authorities creates rehabilitation plans in hopes to decrease condemnable activity. In order to understand this system, we must foremost hold on the history behind the heads of those felons. As with many debatable concerns, many research workers study their household life styles. Do household environments have an influence on childhood aggression and its part to offense? An person ‘s influence to perpetrate offense begins in the early developmental phases of a kid. Patterns of interactions between household members can act upon a kid ‘s development forms, one in which can be aggression. Exposing signifiers of aggression and ill will in early development can further implement schemes to put to death these aggressive forms by executing condemnable Acts of the Apostless. Is it appropriate to warrant offense by agencies of a kid turning up in a coercive place environment and witnessing hostile interactions between household members? Poor parental subject has the ability to take the kid more towards delinquency. With this, a kid has the ability to utilize what they have witnessed in the place to formalize their actions amongst others ; therefore taking to encouraged offense. With this in head, if the person grew up in a dysfunctional family, a rehabilitation plan may non be as effectual due to their environment.

Even though household issues may be the primary cause of such behaviour, social impact may do an addition in offense rates-psychologically, economically, and mentally. These negative societal ways encourage many to turn towards force in hopes to recover a sense of liberty. As we witness the ruin of the economic system, many experience psychological issues environing the negativeness demonstrated throughout society. Along with this, the media seems to pull a bulk of persons with psychological issues ; therefore, leting it to be one of the biggest influences. Within society, we see a widespread growing in media that subconsciously promotes force amongst all ages, i.e. picture games, films, intelligence.

Persons are sing depressive tempers and other psychological issues, which may impact their ability to win in what they wish to carry through. As occupations and the instruction systems are sing fiscal adversities, the success rates of immature grownups are worsening, which encourages Acts of the Apostless of delinquency. By offering plans, while an person is in the condemnable justness system it provides an alternate method to cover with such negative influences. Implementing these plans can authorise these persons to manage their jobs and seek options for their sadness.

A concluding factor that leads to the development of offense is household socioeconomic position. The household ‘s income, parental instruction degree, parental business, and one ‘s societal position in the community determines the household ‘s socioeconomic position. Families with lower socioeconomic position frequently lack the fiscal, societal, and educational support that characterizes households with higher socioeconomic position. Poor households may besides hold inadequate or limited entree to community resources that promote and support kids ‘s development and school preparedness. A household ‘s socioeconomic position can take a kid to misconduct. One ‘s position in this society can lend to mental instability, which can perchance promote the kid to go independent. The increasing rate of unemployment allows household position to worsen. In hopes to recover stableness, condemnable Acts of the Apostless possibly conducted. Experiencing depression due to fiscal instability can besides take to an addition of condemnable Acts of the Apostless.

The authorities is seeking for ways to revamp the condemnable justness system in hopes of rehabilitating the inmates while still maintaining society safe and cut downing their budgets. California ‘s financial crisis is ensuing in a decrease of $ 250 million in Fiscal Year 2009-10 to California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ( CDCR ) rehabilitative plans for grownup wrongdoers, including instruction, vocational, substance maltreatment and other plans for inmates and parolees.A In order to accomplish these nest eggs without compromising public safety, CDCR is developing new ways of presenting rehabilitation plans to make as many inmates as possible with decreased funding.A “ The new budget world has forced our Department to do tough picks as we weigh population decreases, staff layoffs, and a important cut to our rehabilitation scheduling, ” said CDCR Secretary Matthew Cater. “ We must aim our limited resources for plans most likely to cut down recidivism and maintain our communities and our prisons safe. ” “ We are altering the manner we do concern to make as many wrongdoers as possible with less support, ” said Elizabeth Siggins, Acting Chief Deputy Secretary for Adult Programs. “ We are working on schemes to shorten the length of in-prison substance maltreatment intervention, using long-run wrongdoers as counsellors and literacy coachs, developing alternate methods of presenting instruction, and increasing voluntary activities ” ( CDCR ) .

The condemnable justness system hires sociologists and psychologists to react to the above inquiries. Prison rehabilitation plans on a regular basis seek to do available the accomplishments in self-evaluation and self-development in order to help captives in their Hunt for greater self-knowledge. The three groups of rehabilitations plans are corrections, societal, and disincentive.

As the prison population in our state continues to spread out, many local governments/prison systems implemented plans that trained inmates for existent callings and non dead terminal occupations. The Prison Industry Authority implemented plans that trained inmates for existent callings and non dead terminal occupations. These inmates ‘ societal position and life styles changed when they learned woodworking. By and large, the more instruction and developing an person have, the higher their wage. The combination of calling and proficient instruction along with captivity for the qualified will better their societal position and hence, cut down the figure of repetition wrongdoers. Overall, engagement of the incarcerated in correctional instruction plans appears to cut down recidivism.

Assorted corrections rehabilitation plans can be really successful. One rehabilitation plan that was really successful is the Full Circle Recovery plan. This plan started at the San Quentin prison. The Full Circle Recovery Program monitored inmates who were analyzing to go dependence and recovery counsellors. The plan gained significant sum of attending from the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment webcast, a section on the National Public Radio, and widespread Bay Area telecasting new coverage when the bulk of the inmates passed their credentialing tests ( Miranda, 2009 ) .

On January 29, 2001, George W. Bush signed two Executive Orders set uping the Faith-Based and Community Initiative. The plan was directed and conceived by Prison Fellowship Ministries, an evangelical Christian organisation. The plan offered inmates who participated in the plan an chance to have drug and intoxicant intervention, grownup instruction, and individualised guidance, but there were demands to be accepted into the plan ; the inmates had to hold to take the Bible with them in their intervention procedure. The inmates and their households filed a case saying that the plan did non supply intervention for the inmates, but was a method to indoctrinate them into Christianity. The instance went to tribunal and the inmates and their household won the instance. The justice ruled that the plan promoted faith hence ; it was discontinued. In June 2006, the Federal Bureau of Prisons suspended the Bible-based intervention plan in six prisons, after a federal justice in Iowa found that the prison ministry plan was in misdemeanor of the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution ( Odle, 2007 ) .

Another correctional plan is Unmasking Masculinities. This plan focuses on how to deconstruct inmate ‘s hyper maleness in a prison environment and how to assist them redefine maleness. It consisted of making work forces ‘s support groups in correctional installations. Hegemonic Masculinity is the normative ideals of maleness to which work forces are suppose to take. Hegemonic Masculinity is non needfully the most prevailing maleness, but instead the most socially endorsed. Prison codes that are associated with modern-day American hegemonic maleness: suffer in silence, act fearless act difficult, do non swear, make non assist governments, do non hook, ever ready to contend, and do non expose any feminine ways. Inmates display this behaviour in the prison environment in order to last. They have conformed to prison codifications as a consequence and have to demo hyper-masculinity in order to last. Inmates believe is necessary to show a hyper-masculine public facade that may conflict with a more nuanced private self-identity. “ The Public character that persons present when interacting with other inmates may be a familiar pretense, constructed and refined through a long procedure of socialisation into male-dominated subcultures as a kid, stripling, and grownup ” ( Jewkes, 2005 ) . Assorted metaphors are used, such as mask or armour, to stress a differentiation between a public and private individuality. The armour protects the inmate from uncovering exposures, failings, and other qualities that might sabotage a hyper-masculine individuality. In 2002, Steve Spitzer a Professor of Sociology at Suffolk University conducted several surveies inside several prisons. At present, these voluntary groups operated in four correctional establishments in Massachusetts, California and Wisconsin. The plan used inmate voluntaries to take part in the survey. The plan offered a typical and important chance for inmates to see personal growing and transmutation by developing emotional intelligence and personal unity ( Karp, 2010 ) .

Electronic monitoring is a societal rehabilitation plan, which is an alternate manner of forestalling aggression. Technology has affected society and its milieus in a figure of ways. Society is reliant on engineering and utilizes it to do their lives easier. The electronic monitoring system is a positive solution to cut down overcrowding of prison, which cause violent behaviour with the inmates. The electronic monitoring system assists inmates with societal rehabilitation. The carpus or mortise joint has s little sender placed on them to supervise the inmates. Prison employee proctors the inmates at all clip. The system confines the inmate to their place. The system has a agenda programmed, which allows the inmate to come in and go out their place base on the inmate ‘s work agenda and certain fortunes. The plan has proven to be effectual. The plan has reduced costs in the prison system since the electronic monitoring system is being used as a signifier of parturiency ( Otero, 2009 ) .

The tribunals besides use place parturiency as a signifier of community-based corrections. This method is used to curtail the freedom of suspects and wrongdoers and protect society. The tribunals use electronic monitoring as a tool to supervise the inmate that sentenced to place parturiency. Home parturiency is non truly a sentence in itself, but may be a status of probation, word, or supervised release, every bit good as a status of pretrial release. The Federal Bureau of Prisons may besides utilize place parturiency for inmates who are released to function the latter portion of their sentence ( Office of Probation and Pretrial Services ) .

Another societal rehabilitation plan that has been introduced is the keeping order enforcement, which is besides an electronic device used in assisting victims of domestic force. This device alerts the wrongdoer that their victim is in the same topographic point as he is. It allows the wrongdoer to avoid the victim through the use of equal instruments and new engineerings. The propinquity sensing device is composed of two units, that of the victim and that of the wrongdoer ( Otero, 2007 ) .

Disincentive based plans uses retaliatory penalty, renewing justness and normative theory of justness to transfuse fear on the wrongdoer so that they will non perpetrate future offense. General disincentive is based on penalizing wrongdoers to transfuse fright in society, otherwise known as learning society a lesson and demoing the effects of perpetrating offense. Punishment has ever been imposed based on the thought that it will discourage persons from perpetrating offense or reiterating condemnable Acts of the Apostless ( Larrabee, 2011 ) .

Fear-based, unidimensional position of life that regulations out the unbelievable complexness of human interaction and the awe and admiration of the human head as it relates to the enigmas and vagaries of people seeking to transform, alteration, and become “ better ” people or those who are fighting to see the universe through different eyes. Religious imperfects, secular humanists, broad reformists, funny intellectuals, and the mass populace should all take a critical 2nd expression before encompassing this latest turn on criminology. One manner to develop a critical position on these new developments is to take a closer expression at the historical premises and purposes of the criminological tradition on which modern-day bookmans are constructing. An illustration is wrongdoers are told to halt their misbehaviour and, if they do n’t, they and everyone in their pack will experience the effects ( the stick ) . In other words, a pack member commits a offense and all members of the pack will confront charges. Variations on this theoretical account are constructed to suit whatever group the piquing single is involved in. The societal service portion ( the carrot ) is so put into possible drama as echt offers of aid are presented to alter lives, but merely if the wrongdoers accept the footings of the possible effects ( Vrettos, 2010 ) .

Kant ‘s retaliatory theory of penalty, provinces penalty is non justified by any good consequences, but merely by the felon ‘s guilt. Criminals must pay for their offenses ; otherwise an unfairness has occurred. Furthermore, the penalty must suit the offense. Kant asserts that the lone penalty that is appropriate for the offense of slaying is the decease of the liquidator. As he puts it, “ Whoever has committed a slaying must decease. ” ( Kant, 1887 ) Kant ‘s theory is one of equality and you reap what you sow. He believes that the individual deserves the penalty that they receive.

Renewing justness and normative theory of justness articulates three nucleus rules: Principle of Repair, Principles of Stakeholder Involvement, and Principle of Transformation in Community and Government Roles and Relationships. Principle of Repair requires working to mend victims, wrongdoers, and communities that were injured by offense. Principles of Stakeholder Involvement maximise victim, wrongdoer and community engagement in decision-making related to the response to offense. Principle of Transformation in Community and Government Roles and Relationships ends are systemic alteration in condemnable justness bureaus and systems intended to authorise community decision-making and maximise community member premise of duty in the response to offense and injury. Building or reconstructing community capacity needed to exert this duty and to pattern effectual informal responses to offense and struggle, societal control and common support ( Bazemore, 2007 ) .

There is ongoing argument as to whether disincentive or rehabilitation is more successful at cut downing offense rates. Evidence from a wealth of surveies showed that the hazard for re-offending is modifiable when rehabilitation plans are used. Recidivism rates in serious or relentless immature wrongdoers can be reduced by 50 % in community intervention and 30 % in institutional intervention. Surveies showed that deterrence-based plans are uneffective in cut downing offense and the focal point should be on developing rehabilitation plans that do cut down the likeliness of recidivism ( Ore and Birgden, 2003 ) .

Congress has implemented assorted enterprises and measures to help with strategizing to increase public safety, while keeping wrongdoers accountable and commanding corrections disbursement ( HR 4080, 2009 ) . Congress enacted these Bills to help with pull offing corrections budgets ensuing from deficit. The three Bills are the Criminal Justice Reinvestment Act, HR 4080 ; Honest Opportunity Probation with Enforcement Initiative, HR 4055 ; and the Second Chance Act of 2005: Community Safety through Recidivism Prevention.

The Senate and House of Representatives enacted the Criminal Justice Reinvestment Act, HR 4080 besides known as the Criminal Justice Reinvestment Act of 2009. It establishes a condemnable justness reinvestment grant plan to assist States and local legal powers cut down passing on corrections, control growing in the prison and gaol populations and increase public safety. The condemnable justness reinvestment is a data driven plan that analyzes condemnable justness tendencies. It develops and implements policy options to pull off the growing in corrections populations and increase the effectivity of current disbursement and investing to increase public safety and better person and system answerability. It besides measures the impact of the policy alterations and reinvestment resources and holds policymakers accountable for projected consequences.

The Senate and House of Representatives enacted the Honest Opportunity Probation with Enforcement Initiative, HR 4055 in 2009. It is a grant plan established to cut down drug usage, offense, and the costs of captivity. It authorizes the Attorney General to present grants for probation presentation plans that cut down drug usage, offense, and recidivism by necessitating Swift, predictable, and graduated countenances for disobedience with conditions of probation. Requires grant financess to be used for specified intents, including:

( 1 ) identifying high hazard student nurses ;

( 2 ) monitoring student nurses for illicit drug usage ;

( 3 ) reacting to probation misdemeanors with immediate apprehension ;

( 4 ) honoring student nurses who comply with probation regulations ; and

( 5 ) providing for substance maltreatment intervention.

It besides requires the Attorney General to measure yearly probation plans for cost nest eggs and to choose an rating coordinator for such plans.

In April 2005, the bipartizan “ Second Chance Act of 2005: Community Safety through Recidivism Prevention was introduced in the United States House of Representatives. The Bill provides inmates another chance using plans established under this act. The Act entails spread outing reentry services into society for persons released from prison. Previous policies restricted persons with condemnable records from entree to needed services like public aid, lodging, wellness, mental wellness services, instruction and occupation preparation plans ( Pogorzelski, 2005 ) .

Research has revealed that our condemnable justness system requires alterations in order to maintain our society safe and to cut down cost. The Government, Congress, and the Senate besides believe that schemes must be implemented in order to cut down prison budgets. Harmonizing to “ Public Safety, Public Spending: Forecasting America ‘s Prison Population 2007-2011 ” , State and Federal prison populations are expected to increase by 192,000 over that 5-year period at an extra cost of $ 27,500,000,000. States face a $ 350 billion budget deficit over the following 2.5 old ages ( Lav and McNichol, 2009 ) . They enacted the Criminal Justice Reinvestment Act, HR 4080 ; Honest Opportunity Probation with Enforcement Initiative, HR 4055 ; and the Second Chance Act of 2005: Community Safety through Recidivism Prevention in hopes of cut downing the budget and maintaining the community safe.

Some condemnable justness experts believe that the prison system and the authorities are seting excessively much attending on barbarous penalty and non plenty on rehabilitation. However, I believe if the condemnable justness system would concentrate more on cut downing the prison population by offering more intervention plans, instruction plans, and occupation skill developing etcaˆ¦ it could cut down the aggression in the prison system, ensuing in a decrease of recidivism.

Rehabilitation plants in cut downing recidivism. Inmates that complete rehabilitate plans are more successful when they return to society. The inmates go through a procedure called re-socialization, which is a sociological construct that trades with the procedure of mentally and emotionally “ re-training ” a individual so that he or she can run in an environment other than that which he or she is accustomed. Re-socialization involves a complete alteration in personality and behaviour. These persons are taught that there are positive environments that discourage the negative behaviour. Proper therapy and reding provides hope for these single and they learn that there is a better manner to populate. In order for these plans to be effectual, these inmates must desire to alter.

These persons receive an chance to recover self-worth through rehabilitation plans. They are provided with callings, instruction, and developing. They receive chances through rehabilitation plans that were non available prior to their strong beliefs. Their societal position alteration when they work. Statisticss show that persons that receive an instruction are less likely to return to prison. These successful inmates choose non to return to the condemnable justness system after completion of the plans.

Conversely, inmates that are released without being rehabilitation face different barriers. They can non happen a occupation because concerns will non engage persons with a condemnable record because of the hazard or deficiency of experience, interruption in work history, etc. They can non happen a topographic point to populate, particularly those that are go forthing the environment that resulted in their imprisonment. They arrive in the community with multiple disadvantages: drug and intoxicant dependance, mental unwellness, no occupation accomplishments, and limited instruction. Some of these inmates want a 2nd opportunity to do it right and get down a new life, but they are non given a 2nd opportunity. Doors are closed on them, they get despairing, and travel back to what they know how to make to last, which is perpetrating offenses. I hope that with the right aid and public support the inmates can restart a productive, crime-free life.

Figure 1: Imprisonment Rate, 1980-2008


I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out