History of a Death Foretold is a novelette by Gabriel Garcia Marquez that centres around the storyteller ‘s attempts to set together the fragments of memories of a slaying that took topographic point in a little Latin-american coastal town 27 old ages antecedently. This transition from the novel takes topographic point at the terminal of chapter two, where Angela Vicario was sent place by her fiance Bayardo, and was about beaten to decease by her female parent Pura Vicario, all because Angela had lost her virginity. The construct of virginity in this extract has been developed to such a deepness that the readers are urged to oppugn the societal conventions and inequalities imposed upon adult females.
The transition is written in chronological order that describes the events in an orderly manner, but really has another bed of deeper significance concealed underneath the head covering of apparent narrative. First, the chronological narrative tells the narrative in a natural sequence, in a manner where the readers can easy prosecute in and understand the secret plan. The readers foremost see Angela being sent back place because she was non a virgin, ensuing in her female parent, Pura Vicario, earnestly crushing her. This is so followed by her ramping brothers demanding the name of the adult male responsible for Angela ‘s loss of virginity, all arranged chronologically. Each event happens due to the old one, and this logic and lucidity achieved, and this chronological order allows the uninterrupted happening of events that revolves around Angela ‘s virginity to each autumn neatly into topographic point, and subtly but certainly raises the issue of adult females ‘s unjust duties and outlooks present in society. So the chronological narrative makes the secret plan clear and logical, and the beds of significances farther prosecute the readers, which strongly present to them the chief subject of the transition.
The chief subject of the transition centres around virginity, and the intimation of the subject of award supports the unjust dual criterions and the favoritism of sex functions that adult females must populate up to. Marquez has weaved the subject into the secret plan in such a manner that would bring forth a reaction from the readers. At the beginning of the text, Bayardo returned Angela back because she was n’t a virgin. Angela ‘s “ frock was in scintillas ” , which is a intimation that she had been beaten by Bayardo for non stating him the truth earlier. Refusing to get married Angela and exercising force onto her due to such fiddling grounds may look unacceptable for us readers ; but in society it was seen as an honest act, therefore doing Bayardo an honest individual at the clip. Furthermore, when Pura Vicario beat her girl to the brink of decease, “ she did with such stealing ” ( p 46 ) that no 1 found out about it until much subsequently. True, Angela did make a dishonourable act by holding sex before matrimony, which brought shame onto her household ; nevertheless she took her whipping mutely because she had a strong sense of award, and acknowledged what she did was wrong, which suggests her possibly honest nature. We learn that although the characters have imperfectnesss, they besides have something delivering about them. This compels the readers to knock non merely the characters, but besides consider the traditions, cultural values and societal conventions that influence the characters ‘ actions. The comparatively minor subject of award reinforces the major subject of sexism inside this peculiar extract, which successfully high spots and puts an accent on the barbarous societal conventions placed on adult females, such as the overrated importance of virginity.
Marquez besides manipulates linguistic communication to do the absurd sound normal, utilizing niceties to act upon us in our judgements towards the norms in South American society, such as the unjust dual criterion placed on adult females. This is a manner known as Charming Realism that Marquez is celebrated for. For illustration, when Angela was sent place by Bayardo, she was dressed in a chopped frock and her female parent Pura Vicario was given a daze, as she “ said in panic ” : “ ‘Holy Mother Of God ‘ ” ( p 46 ) . Although rather excessive and impolite in forepart of a invitee, this conversational duologue shows that Pura, as a female parent, expresses a deep concern towards Angela. However every bit shortly as Pura learnt that Bayardo had sent her girl place due to her non being a virgin, Pura instantly gave Angela a whipping, and Angela recalled that “ [ she ] thought [ Pura ] was traveling to kill [ her ] ” ( p 47 ) . The fact that a female parent is willing to physically mistreat her ain kid merely minutes after praying to God for her survival depicts Pura ‘s pathetic alteration in attitude ; but it is precisely this absurdness that grabs the readers ‘ attending and exemplifies the absurd, exaggerated importance of virginity in society, and strongly criticizes the societal norms at the clip. Additionally, after Angela ‘s whipping had been done, all she wanted was “ for it to be over rapidly so [ she ] could flop down and travel to kip ” ( p 47 ) . The verb phrase “ flop down ” here has a really insouciant intension, and we see no marks of her feeling any fury or defeat towards Pura Vicario who had merely beaten her minutes ago. But the storyteller does non farther explicate this absurdness, which efficaciously provokes the readers to oppugn about the ground behind her evident deficiency of choler. One can merely infer that Angela does non oppugn the justness of her whipping, and that her civilization brought her up in a manner that she believes what she did was incorrectly. This profoundly reveals the absurd sexual function that adult females play in society ; it ‘s as if virginity is the most of import facet of a adult female. Furthermore, the absurdness of the sentence and earnestness of the tone blend in together, making a phantasmagoric touch to his work, pulling the readers ‘ attending, prosecuting them, and enables the bringing of the subject to be more impactful on the readers.
Last, Marquez weaves in literary techniques into the text to heighten the impact of the message. When Angela accused Santiago of being responsible for her loss of pureness, “ she nailed it to the wall with her well aimed dart, like a butterfly with no will whose sentence has already been written ” ( p 47 ) . This simile creates an imagination of a butterfly impotently nailed to the wall, which symbolizes both Santiago and Angela ‘s circumstance. One bed of this simile would be an indicant of Santiago ‘s now inevitable decease ; the twins must kill him in order to reconstruct Angela ‘s and their household ‘s award. Killing is a great wickedness, and the asceticism of the offense they were approximately to perpetrate efficaciously mirrors the absurd award and value set upon a female ‘s virginity at the clip. Additionally, Marquez does non clearly indicate whom the imagination of the butterfly is mentioning to ; the latter nicety in the simile lies in the significance behind Angela ‘s accusal. Angela ‘s lost virginity was a affair of award non merely for her, but her whole household ; therefore she was obliged to supply an account for this and allow her brothers find a manner to unclutter the shame off her name. But by making so, she accepts and is “ nailed ” to the false values imposed on virginity by society, which consequences in Santiago Nasar ‘s decease. Clearly cultural mores that lead to such bad lucks are non desirable for a healthy society ; so smartly, this simile with dual beds of intending provides the readers with a powerful intimation, which efficaciously provokes them to recognize the overvalued construct of virginity at the clip, therefore criticizes the issue of sexism in society.
Indeed, Marquez has successfully conveyed a message to us. In this short transition, with all the unpleasant events focus oning Angela ‘s lost virginity, Marquez has compellingly revealed to us the barbarous societal criterions sing virginity that adult females have to digest. Through his nonsubjective and journalistic narrative, Marquez does non give us a unequivocal position on the society. Alternatively, he produces a reaction from the readers with the voice hidden behind the narrative, and forces us to reflect on the issues that exist in society.