The big eu enlargement

Introduction

The 2004 expansion consisted of 75 million people fall ining the European Union ( EU ) , the bulk of these accession states were from the ‘Eastern Bloc ‘ . The issues associated with Eastern Europe were and possibly still are a major cause for concern, these being the lagging economic systems of said states and the hapless to about non-existent labour conditions within.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!


order now

This essay will foremost turn to the many misconceptions that were and still are prevailing in Western Europe. This will put the evidences for farther treatment and debut of the construct of societal dumping. Evidence will be introduced from the organic structure of research within this field.

The issue of societal dumping within the EU will be considered from a policy point of view. Article 39 of the EC Treaty allows for the free motion of workers, but what is the impact of such policies? This essay finds that the societal dimension of the EU has been an after-thought to the economic dimension, and as such many policies appear to be ad hoc and lacking in substance.

Discussion

Some cardinal points Barysch ( 2006 ) discusses are misconceptions the West holds about the East which fuels the populaces ‘ imaginativeness ; if we consider factors like the theory of the ‘Polish Plumber ‘ or ‘Latvian Builders ‘ stealing ‘our occupations ‘ by underselling local rewards and ignoring societal criterions ; the echoing Eastern economic success at the disbursal of the West ; inexpensive imports from states like Slovakia and Poland out pricing western European goods ; unemployment rates in the 2004 expansion states was about 15 % compared with EU norm of 8.5 % .

These issues raise cardinal inquiries, is the Eastern Bloc, utilizing competitory advantage with respect to lax societal policies, working conditions and in peculiar wage? Are occupations being transferred from the West to the East due to these fiscal benefits for houses? Is this societal dumping ( unjust competition ) or just competition?

The issue of societal dumping has been raised by many bookmans, but really few have attempted to specify the nucleus rules of it. Social dumping harmonizing to Vaughan-Whitehead ( 2003, pg.324 ) , is a term borrowed from economic sciences, in the societal context, ‘it has the purpose to derive more market portion through lower monetary values ‘ .

However, Vaughan-Whitehead ( 2003 ) provinces there is a all right line between illegal societal dumping and what can be referred to as legal societal dumping ( otherwise termed comparative advantage ) . It is a hard undertaking to analyze societal dumping and its much complexnesss without admiting the impudent side of the coin, just competition. A inquiry that arises here is, at what point does a states economic and societal advantage over another become illegal? After all the promise of globalization is to let markets to open up to such competition.

A continuance of Vaughan-Whiteheads ( 2003 ) definition of societal dumping, includes the impression that it is non restricted to merely enterprises, but instead provinces play a major manus in societal dumping, via policy scene and ‘through the acceptance or non of a legislative or institutional model in the societal field ‘ . There is fear by authoritiess that by undertaking societal dumping they may be seting themselves at a ‘competitive disadvantage ‘ .

This essay will now cast some visible radiation on the policies set in topographic point for the Member States of the European Union to continue the societal rules of ‘European Citizenship ‘ . The cardinal subject for treatment is ‘the free motion of workers ‘ as enshrined in Article 39 of the EC Treaty. If we examine the history of the free motion of workers since the origin of the EU, we find ab initio it had an economic dimension [ 1 ] , which allowed the motion of people subject to their ain fiscal investing in such determinations. It so took on a societal dimension, by the inclusion of societal rights for the workers and their households, peculiarly the right for reunion. The political dimension was following, which finally afforded the motion of people who were non economically active every bit long as they could back up themselves. Finally the constitutional dimension, which introduced the impression of rights and duties associated with EU citizenship, in the signifier of the European Social Charter ( ESC ) .

The ESC warrants cardinal rights to EU citizens and besides provides a supervisory mechanism for their regard by State Parties. The ESC warrants entree to lodging, health care, instruction, employment, legal and societal protection, motion of individuals and non-discrimination. The cardinal advocate to supervise whether states have honoured the rights of citizens is the European Committee of Social Rights ( ECSR ) . Monitoring takes topographic point through national studies and a corporate ailments process.

Along with the extended list of policies regulating societal freedom, an sarcasm within itself, is the entree for Member States to important degrees of support, administrations such as, The European Social Fund ( ESF ) , PROGRESS Programme, European Regional Development Fund ( ERDF ) , Cohesion Fund ( CF ) and eventually European Globalisation Adjustment Fund ( EGF ) .

Puting up such financess within the EU is sanctioned under Article 158 of the Treaty, with the purpose of, ‘reducing the economic, societal and territorial disparities which have arisen peculiarly in states and parts whose development is dawdling behind and in connexion with economic and societal restructuring, ‘ ( Chapter II, Article 3, Aims. Council Regulation 1083/2006 ) .

It is therefore apparent ; from the EU ‘s point of view they do hold that there are ‘social disparities‘ within parts.

Now that the background to the job of societal dumping and policies in topographic point to protect workers have been discussed, the issue of societal dumping in an East-West context will be analysed.

We must foremost see the important differences in wage across the EU, which are possibly, the greatest obstruction for free motion without negative intensions ( Barysch, 2006 ; Sykes 2005 ) . Table A. represents these figures on an mean monthly wage.

From the tabular array, it is easy for one to admit merely how important the disparities are. It is apparent from a corporate position to use 10 Bulgarian subjects for the Price of one Luxembourg national, makes economic sense, even if it means traveling operations from the latter to the former.

A Key advocate of Vaughan-Whiteheads ‘ ( 2003 ) societal dumping definition is the hunt for below market monetary value labor. However, one would reason that the ESC warrants fair working conditions as respects wage and working hours. So how can an Eastern European national work in another state at the disbursal of a native? The reply to this is besides enshrined within statute law, foremost, ESC does guarantee the rights with respect to pay and conditions, and therefore a migratory worker would be paid every bit to that which a national would be paid for the same occupation.

Conversely the Posted Workers Directive ( PWD ) allows for the proviso of services by individuals whom are ‘posted ‘ within a host state. This directive has been used to work the labour systems ( Hellsten, 2005 ) of many Western European states, whereby, the working party Acts of the Apostless as a freelance entity, posted on the lands of the host state by an agent, jobber or sub-contracting party in their place state. Therefore the posted worker does non hold to stay by the ordinances set in gesture with respect to pay, conditions, working hours and revenue enhancement ( Kvist 2004 ) . As Cremers et Al ( 2007 ) discuss, the PWD has a great function to play in the free motion rule, nevertheless it is besides the biggest loophole for foreign 3rd parties to work. Harmonizing to Cremer et Al ( 2007 ) , a important protection and bar can be adopted through analyzing the nature of the PWD in relation to societal dumping and the usage by third-parties.

An of import fact to observe from Cremers et Al ( 2007 ) statement is, that an full industry ( such as building ) can be affected by a little figure of houses involved in societal dumping, as they finally upset the price/wage construction and trigger a ‘downward spiral ‘ .

The instance of Laval Un Partneri, was a really of import landmark instance within this range. It highlighted the demand for the protection of national labor criterions and policies and let migrant/posted workers the chance to be involved in the procedure. As discussed by Woolfson & A ; Sommers ( 2006 ) , ‘ labour positions additions of ‘Europeanization ‘ as mostly passing, and simply a stalking-horse for private power to gain at its disbursal by a ‘race to the underside ‘ . The laval instance showed how of import the function of brotherhoods is and likened it to ‘wage constabulary ‘ , whom have to strike the right balance between protecting involvements of indigens but besides appealing to the posted workers ( Cremer et al 2007 ) .

Cremer et Al ( 2007 ) suggest the laval instance highlighted how the sovereignty of national industrial criterions were being scrutinized by the ECJ. This was besides highlighted in the instance of Polish workers posted to the UK, whom were fired by the ‘agency‘ for seeking to fall in a Union ( Financial Times, 19th May 2007 ) . The Agency argued that the employees were self employed and therefore there was no formal contract between worker and bureau. The justice ruled that the workers were in fact employees. The very nature of the relationship implied a contract between the parties ( Cremer et al 2007 ; Tait 2007 ) .

The above is farther grounds that all is non good in the PWD cantonment and many alterations are necessary for there to be comprehensive protection for posted worker and national industries from societal, pay and revenue enhancement dumping.

If the being of ESC is non able to vouch cardinal rights for a indigen over development of loopholes by migrant/posted workers. What is the intent of the ESC? A survey by Addison & A ; Seibert ( 1991 ) suggested that ‘the Social Charter would increase labor costs ‘ and finally it would non be able to accomplish the end of societal equality. Further to this a survey by Alesina & A ; Perotti ( 2004 ) argue that no authorities takes any of the employment policies as remotely adhering and they could non happen any state where the National Action Plans were steering policy. Many of the old EU-15 states had, and in some instances, still do hold strong national system for industrial dealingss, any effort by the EU to alter these drastically will non be welcomed.

Therefore far this essay has addressed societal dumping under the pretense of posted workers and development of national criterions. Now a different sort of societal dumping, or to be more specific flight of capital, industry and finally occupations to the East. As far back as 1994 Erickson and Kuruvilla suggested there would be capital flight from high cost to low cost states and this would ensue in a depression of labour criterions. Conversely Vintrova ( 2004 ) argues that the Eastern Bloc has a competitory advantage in the sense of low unit labor costs but does non ‘exploit this advantage sufficiently ‘ . The instance of Phillips relocating operations from France, Germany, Netherlands and UK to eight production installations in Poland ( Vaughan-Whitehead 2003 p.384 ) may possibly hold slipped under the radio detection and ranging.

The manus that authoritiess play can non be understated, by continuing an environment of low/flat revenue enhancement ( Barysch 2006 ) , no national lower limit pay and no proviso protecting the being of trade brotherhoods makes for a moneymaking environment for MNC ‘s to boom ( Vaughan-Whitehead 2003 p.328 ) .

The impression of a race to the underside ( Vaughan-Whitehead 2003 ; Woolfson & A ; Sommers 2006 ; Kvist 2004 ; Kovacheva 2008 ; Sykes 2005 ) , implies that all Member States are seeking to stay competitory in position of the handiness of lower revenue enhancements, rewards and societal criterions, therefore provisions/concessions will be necessary to cut down costs in Western Europe ( Vaughan-Whitehead 2003 ) , moreover Barysch ( 2006 ) argues that unjust competition and societal dumping is enticing occupations due easts.

However, there are a figure of statements in favor of the Eastern position, Ramsey ( 1995 ) , suggested that there was a fright that the labour force would go forth for the West in hunt of higher rewards and life criterions. The flight of labor was seen to be a job associated with high unemployment and dawdling behind advanced economic systems of the West.

Kovacheva ( 2008 ) suggests that the result of whether it is a ‘race to the underside ‘ or a ‘race to the top ‘ is comparative to the purposes and aspirations of the EU. Identifying that migratory workers add more to the economic system so they take and complement the domestic work force.

An interesting point to observe, out of the legion official EU paperss studied, non one made mention to societal, pay or revenue enhancement dumping and non one addressed how policies may necessitate rectifying and or farther amendments.

If the function of the EGF is considered, it is about an admittance of capital flight or the instability the 2004 expansion has caused to capital and labor. The function of the EGF is to back up workers who may hold lost their occupations due to altering planetary trade forms. Since 2007 EGF has spent 67 million Euro ‘s due to ‘globalisation and regional changing forms ‘ .

An add-on to this is the ESF which has a exclusive intent of cut downing differences in prosperity and life criterions and finally advancing economic and societal coherence. The sum of funding the ESF provided to Member States shows a instead unusual form, the CEE-8 from the 2004 expansion plus Bulgaria and Romania had a sum of a‚¬26.2 Billion as compared with the UK, Italy, Germany and France who had the same. If one considers the intent of this fund to advance economic and societal coherence, so why is so much being spent on strong economic systems of Western Europe, certainly the support forms should demo more traveling to Eastern Europe to ‘reduce the difference in life criterions ‘ .

Decision

The attack of the EU towards societal policies appears to hold been about a spill-over from the economic policies, whereby merely little corrections over clip have resulted in the ESC and assorted prejudiced statute laws relative to the Member States.

There has been strong grounds demoing societal dumping is taking topographic point, and irrespective of policies such as PWD to protect province and workers from development, really small is really being done. The monitoring mechanisms appear to be making merely that monitoring, but really small resort to countenances. Many policies are enshrined within the EC Treaty from its origin but lack any existent deepness when applied to assorted states and state of affairss.

Cardinal points to see are the costs of implementing societal equality to endeavors. At a clip of recession, houses are already cutting costs, and as such, Member State enterprises to increase those costs by holding houses monitor certain policies would besides ensue in capital flight.

The more policies the EU and Member States bring into statute law the more barriers to concern addition. This possibly consequences in the flight of capital from the EU wholly.

It is therefore apparent that free motion of workers, is in fact, impeded by policies turn toing it. The about neo-liberal policies that are being implemented are leting more bargaining power to the employers in the West and doing the Eastern markets look far more attractive with respect to labor unit cost.

Member States attempt to enforce limitations like enrollment and cogent evidence of self-employment, but the EU feels harmonizing to the PWD directives this is know aparting against the individual, therefore any farther action by Member States can be scene as non-compliance. It shows Member States, to some grade, have had to lose some control over national policies due to Europeanization.

However, if the EU efforts to construct societal justness alongside economic dynamism as opposed to the societal factor as a byproduct of economic docket. There is possible for positive results, particularly if the lagging economic systems, instruction systems and labour criterions of Eastern Europe are brought in-line with the EU criterions. This can act upon policies based non on stereotypes or cultural prejudice but instead on one vision, one societal end and one economic docket.

Bibliography

Addison, J. T. , & A ; Siebert, W. S. , 1991, The Social Charter of the European Community: Development and Controversies, Journal of Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.44 ( 4 ) , pg.597-625

Alesina, A. , & A ; Perotti, R. , 2004, The European Union: A Politically Incorrect View, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.18 ( 4 ) , pg.27-48

Barysch, K. , 2006, East versus West? The EU Economy after Enlargement, Centre for European Reform essays

Cremers, J. , et al. , 2007, Posting of Workers in the Single Market: Attempts to Prevent Social Dumping and Regime Competition in the EU, Industrial Relations Journal, Vol.38 ( 6 ) , pg.524-541

Erickson, C. L. , & A ; Kuruvilla, S. , 1994, Labour Costs and the Social Dumping Debate in the European Union, Journal of Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.48 ( 1 ) , pg.28-47

Gilland, K. , & A ; Chari, R. , 2001, European Integration: Expansion Now and Then: Deductions for Ireland, Irish Studies in International Affairs, Vol.12 ( 2001 ) , pg.215-230

Grawert, R. , 2005, Free Movement of Workers: Changing the European Society, Journal of Managerial Law, Vol.47 ( 6 ) , pg.69-81

Hellsten, J. , 2005, On Social and Economic Factors in the Developing European Labour Law, First Article of the Doctoral Dissertation, ‘ From Internal Market Regulation to European Labour Law ‘ , Swedish National Institute for Working Life

Kovacheva, P. , 2008, The European Social Model after Enlargement “race to the bottom” or “race to the top” ? Discussion Paper, Policy Network

Kvist, J. , 2004, Does EU enlargement get down a race to the underside? Strategic interaction among EU member provinces in societal policy, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol.14 ( 3 ) , pg. 301-318

Ramsey, L. E. , 1995, The Deductions of the European Agreements for an Expanded European Union, International & A ; Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.44, pg.161-171

Sykes, R. , 2005, Crisis? What Crisis? EU Enlargement and the Political Economy of European Union Social Policy, Journal of Social Policy & A ; Society, Vol.4 ( 2 ) , pg. 207-215

Tait, N. , 2007, Migrant Workers Win Right to be Treated as Employees, Financial Times, 19 May 2007. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.ft.com, accessed on 06 November 2009.

Vaughan-Whitehead, D. , 2003, EU Enlargement versus Social Europe: The Uncertain Future of the European Social Model, Edward Elgar Publishing

Vintrova, R. , 2004, The CEE Countries on the Way into the EU: Adjustment Problems: Institutional Adjustment, Real and Nominal Convergence, Journal of Europe-Asia Studies, Vol.56 ( 4 ) , pg.521-541

Woolfson, C. , & A ; Sommers, J. , 2006, Labour Mobility in Construction: European Deductions of the Laval Un Partneri Dispute with Swedish Labour, European Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol.12 ( 1 ) , pg.49-68

The European Social Charter, 2008, A Council of Europe Treaty: Safeguarding Human Rights, Department of the European Social Charter

  1. University of Bucharest – Survey on Four Dimensions
x

Hi!
I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out