Reviewing Analysis Of The Criminal Justice System Criminology Essay

The Criminal Justice System ( CJS ) consists of three elements, the Police, Courts and Corrections. It is no secret The CJS has been to a great extent criticized over the old ages about its overall effectivity, some sceptics have gone every bit far as to state the condemnable justness system is non a system at all based on “ its current operation and atomization, it is simply a procedure. A procedure that involves the determination and actions taken by an establishment, wrongdoer, victim, or society that influence the wrongdoer ‘s motion into, through, or out of the justness system. ” ( Peake, 2010, p.5 ) Some perceivers contend the justness systems are a web. Steven Cox and John Wade “ depict the justness system as a telecasting of wireless web whose Stationss portion many plans but each station presents plans the web does n’t aerate on other Stationss. ” ( Peak, 2010, p.7 ) “ Others argue that the justness system comprises a condemnable justness nonsystem, a system that trade with condemnable behaviour non ever working in harmoniousness and is neither efficient plenty to make a believable fright of penalty or just plenty to command regard for its values. ” ( Peak, 2010, p.8 )

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

Police Military officers are the first line of defence in this complex organisation of the CJS. They have a broad scope of duties and beds which includes groking felons, keeping public order, forestalling and observing offenses. They ‘re besides trained in counter-terrorism, surveillance, kid protection, VIP protection, and probe techniques into major offenses such as fraud, colza, slaying or drug trafficking.

Community-oriented policing and job resolution ( COPPS ) is the dominant scheme of policies whose attack to offense sensing and bar provides police officers and supervisors with new tools for turn toing jobs in the communities. The S.A.R.A procedure ( Scanning, Analysis, Response, Assessment ) is a necessary tool that provides officers with a logical step-by-step model to place, analyse, respond to, and measure offense, fright of offense and vicinity upset. “ ( Peak, 2010, p.69 ) When used efficaciously, these tools are indispensable in battling offenses in the community, and guaranting a cohesive relationship between officers and occupants.

Some of the most of import and ambitious places in our society are those of constabularies decision maker, director, or supervisor. Henry Mintzberg described three chief functions of the Police Chief or Sheriff: the interpersonal, informational, and the decision-maker. The Interpersonal has three constituents: the front man who attends ceremonial maps, civic events, swearing-in ceremonials, the leading motivates and coordinates workers while accomplishing the mission, ends and demands within the section and community, the affair interacts with other organisations and co-ordinates work assignments. The Informational engages in undertakings associating to monitoring/inspecting, airing, and spokesman responsibilities. The Decision-Maker serves as an enterpriser, a perturbation animal trainer and a negotiant. ( Peak, 2010 pgs. 89-91 ) The Chief of Police or Sheriff is at the top of the Police organisational chart, his effectivity or deficiency thereof will find the success or failure of their bureau ( s ) .

Law enforcement officers have duties that outweigh many of our challenges as a civilian. These duties are frequently times plagued with deeper issues both personal and professional that negatively impact the ability of officers to efficaciously execute their responsibilities. For illustration, there have been several incidents affecting the usage of force and maltreatment of authorization by officers. “ Profanity is portion of police civilization, used in mundane address ” . ( Peak, 2010, p.118 ) Unfortunately these verbal and psychological maltreatment tactics are used by some constabulary officers. Therefore, if it is used as a agency to pass on on a day-to-day footing, it is certainly used in a state of affairs to “ derive control ” of a state of affairs when covering with civilians. This signifier of bullying is a manner of take downing person ‘s character, doing them defensive and exacerbating a smilingly guiltless interaction into a helter-skelter confrontation. As in the incident affecting the videotaped whipping of Rodney King by several constabularies officers after he was pulled over for a moving misdemeanor. Military officers claim he resisted apprehension, the videotape proved otherwise. This incident prompted the U.S. Supreme Court to do a opinion on the usage of force at apprehension it must be objectively sensible in position of all the facts and fortunes of each peculiar instance, including the badness of the offense at issue, whether the suspect poses an immediate menace to the safety of the officers or others, and whether he is actively defying apprehension or trying to hedge apprehension by flight. ( Peak, 2010, p.117 )

Two studies that followed the Rodney King whipping — the 1991 study of the Independent Commission to Analyze the Los Angeles Police Department and the 1992 Los Angeles County Sheriff ‘s Report by James G. Kolt and staff — questioned the effectivity of bing psychological showing to foretell leaning for force. ( Scrivner, 1994 )

Agencies require their officers to be “ objectively sensible ” in their usage of force and have adopted the definition by the International Association of Chiefs of Police: In finding the necessity for force and appropriate degree of force, officers shall measure each state of affairs in visible radiation of the known fortunes, including, but non limited to, the earnestness of the offense, the degree of the menace or opposition presented by the topic, and the danger to the community. ( Peak, 2010, p.120 ) The DRRM ( Dynamic Resistance Response Model ) which combines a use-of-force continuum with the behaviours of suspects was developed to “ more accurately reflect the purpose of the jurisprudence and the altering outlooks of society ” . ( Peak, 2010, p.120 ) Two publicized contagious hiting incidents have plagued officers in the past old ages. In 1999, Amadou Diallo, a 22 twelvemonth old West African street seller was changeable 19 times by four under cover New York constabulary officers who mistook him for a consecutive raper. In April 2007, three clandestine New York Police officers were indicted for the manslaughter and foolhardy hazard for killing Sean Bell in a hail of 50 slugs discharged at him and riders in his vehicle while unarmed. Military officers assumed one of the victims had a arm. ( Peak, 2010, p.120-121 ) The DRRM theoretical account was clearly non utilized in these two incidents, premises cost the lives of two guiltless civilians at the custodies of fanatic constabulary officers.

Suicide by bull and vehicle chases, are incidents that require disconnected 2nd determinations by constabulary officers as it pertains to the public safety of the community but with unsafe and deathly effects seting guiltless bystanders at hazard.

Biased-based policing or “ Racial profiling ” occurs when the constabulary mark person for probe on the footing of that individual ‘s race, national beginning, or ethnicity. This pattern has become more controversial toward the terminal of the twentieth century as the potency for maltreatment by jurisprudence enforcement came to visible radiation. Race or colour may be a factor to see during certain constabulary activity but Race or colour entirely is deficient for doing a halt or apprehension. ( Schott, 2001 )

With the addition in offense and the demand for 24 hr round the clock constabulary presence, Police officers are covering with displacement work and sleep want. Both issues can hold deathly effects for both the officer and civilians. An officer who is enduring from sleep want can non do scruples judgmental determinations when groking a suspect, finding the usage of force if a fishy resists arrest, vehicle chases or firing a arm. When a individual is deprived of slumber, existent alterations occur in the encephalon that can non be overcome with self-control, caffeine, or nicotine. The diminution in watchfulness, judgement, and safety in relation to the addition in hours on the occupation can non be trivialized. Community perceptual experiences of fatigue-related hazard have changed and now are viewed as perfectly unacceptable, every bit good as preventable. As a effect, jurisprudence enforcement professionals face a greater reactive force per unit area both politically and lawfully to rethink and implement proactive schemes to cut down fatigue-related incidents. ( Lindsey, D, 2007 )


The tribunals were established to seek the accused, have a jury of their equals determine their destiny based on grounds presented by the prosecution and the defence. The justice is the go-between between both parties he allows or overrules statements, remarks and grounds that could prejudice the jury ‘s sentiment. Once the grounds and shutting statements has been presented on both sides, the justice instructs the jury to consider and return with a finding of fact of guilt or artlessness. Most people would hold that the intent of our tribunals is to supply a forum for seeking and through the adversarial system of justness obtaining the truth. ( Peak, 2010, p.187 ) Wikipedia describes the adversarial system as the system of jurisprudence that relies on the competition between each advocator stand foring his or her party ‘s places and involves an impartial individual or group of people, normally a jury or justice, seeking to find the truth of the instance. There are many beds of the tribunals that make up its functionality.

The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest and one of the oldest tribunals in the state formed in 1970. Composed of 9 justnesss: one head justness and eight associate justnesss. They are appointed by the President and serve their footings for life. Each new term of the Supreme Court begins, by legislative act, on the first Monday in October. ( Peak, 2010, p.187-188 ) There are 94 U.S. territory tribunals, 89 of which are located within the 50 provinces. ( Peak, 2010, p.191 ) There are three methods used to choice Judgess: partizan elections which are concentrated largely in the southern provinces, nonpartizan elections are held in the West and upper Midwest, while legislative and executive assignments in the East and virtue choice West of the Mississippi. ( Peak, 2010, p.206 ) The pros and cons of each choice method are as follows:

Partisan elections- Based on the campaigner ‘s party association. Pro- The campaigner ‘s success of being nomination is based on the sum of run financess and or indorsements by the peculiar party. Con-The campaigner may non be endorsed by his or her party association, ensuing in low run financess and deficiency of support.

Non-partisan elections- No party association. Pro- Election is just across the board without any biass associated with a party association ; campaigner can obtain ballots from both parties every bit good as open electors. Con- The deficiency of association may negatively impact the campaigner ‘s opportunity of being elected.

Legislative elections and executive appointments- Vacancy filled by the Governor. Pro- The choice is non based on elector ‘s party associations. Con- The assignment is based on the determination of the Governor to make full a vacancy that has occurred

Merit choice ( Missouri Bar Plan ) – involves the creative activity of a nominating committee ; composed of attorneies and laymans. Pro- The commission presents the most qualified attorneies to the Governor, who chooses one individual as justice. The Judge bases uncontested before the electors. Cons- The attorneies and laymans of the commission determination may be compromised by the deficiency of qualified campaigners and or biased sentiments of the campaigner ‘s party association. ( Peak, 2010, p.206-207 )

With many people revolving in and out of the courtrooms, jobs will happen. Several issues blighting the US Court systems include, courthouse force and how to execute a menace appraisal, how problem-solving tribunals are spread outing, the quandary of hold, the construct of how ADR ( alternate difference declaration ) is used, media dealingss and the tribunals, gender prejudice, juveniles being treated as grownups, bonds in tribunals, usage of cameras in the courtrooms and supplication bargaining. ( Peak, 2010, p. 224 )

Courthouse force happenings are few and far between but one instance can trip a intimation of concern within the community. Non-targeted courthouse force is described as force with no preexistent purpose but evolves from a opinion after tribunal proceedings. Targeted courthouse force is deemed as the antonym, purpose to do injury and frequently creates programs to besiege security steps. ( Peak, 2010, p.226 ) In 2004 and early 2005, the Maricopa County Superior Court reevaluated its security policies and put in topographic point, through Administrative Order No. 2004-031, a new policy to fasten tribunal security, which was smartly opposed by some. This article discusses how a tribunal views “ tribunal security ” in footings of the involvement groups affected and how they may impede or assist tribunal security, the scope and deepness of issues encompassed by tribunal security, and, eventually, the pressing demand for the tribunal to educate the populace and other involvement groups about critical security concerns. ( Campbell, Reinkensmeyer, 2007 ) .

Good menace appraisals involve three rules: ( 1 ) Targeted force is the terminal consequence of an apprehensible and frequently discernable procedure of thought and playing. ( 2 ) One must separate between showing a menace and presenting a menace. ( 3 ) Violence is the merchandise of an interaction among the possible aggressor, his or her current state of affairs, the mark, and the scene. Metallic sensors are platitude in courtrooms to forestall any force but there are times when force work stoppages courthouse forces and/or persons outside the tribunals. As in the instance of a federal territory tribunal justice in Chicago whose household members were the mark of force based on a disdain of tribunal charge. ( Peak, 2010, p.225 )

The back log of instances within the tribunal system has been an on-going issue in the past old ages ; it has had a negative consequence on the accused go againsting their Sixth Amendment right of a rapid test.

In certain choice federal territories ( but merely in those territories ) , the Department of Justice ( DOJ ) operates “ fast-track ” condemning plans through which it grants profoundly below-Guidelines sentences to illegal reentry suspects in exchange for speedy guilty supplications. ( Siegler, 2009 ) The best-known statute law turn toing the job is the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, amended in 1979. It provides steadfast clip bounds: 30 yearss from the clip of apprehension to indictment and 70 yearss from indictment to test. ( Peak, 2010, p.230 ) Although this statute law has a proved path record, its most effectual in less violent instances such as drug trafficking, and junior-grade offenses.

Problem-solving tribunals are turn outing that they can absorb a sufficient portion of the tribunal system ‘s overall caseload to warrant their being. Early ratings suggest that problem-solving tribunals can be every bit expeditious as the traditional tribunals hearing comparable types of instances. ( Casey, Rottman, 2005 ) They have been successful in extinguishing the backlog of tribunal instances and supplying options to imprison clip such as community service, drug rehabilitation, and mental wellness aid.


Prison or Correctional Facility is a topographic point of parturiency for people who have committed serious offenses. Prison organisational constructions have changed well to react to external demands. They were administered by province boards of charities, boards composed if citizens, board of inspectors, province prison committees, or single prison keepers. ( Peak, 2010, p.256 ) A Warden is an functionary in charge of the prison. Correctional officers ( CO ‘s ) preside over the inmates. CO ‘s are categorized into 5 types: ( 1 ) Rule hatchet mans, ( 2 ) Hard-liners, ( 3 ) People workers, ( 4 ) Man-made officers, and ( 5 ) Loners. By and large the regulation hatchet mans were most likely to keep unmarried man or maestro ‘s grades. ( Peak, 2010, p.287 ) There has been debate as to whether CO ‘s should be required to hold grades. The province of Florida has inducements for CO ‘s with grades:

The Florida Department of Corrections provides $ 30 extra a month to an officer with an associate grade and $ 80 extra a month for officers with unmarried man ‘s grades or higher ( Florida State Board of Community Colleges 1996 ) . The Arizona Department of Corrections provides an educational allowance for Corrections Officer III and supra. A Corrections Officer III and above receives a 2.5 per centum one-year salary addition for an associate grade, a five per centum one-year salary addition for a unmarried man ‘s grade, and a 7.5 per centum one-year salary addition for a maestro ‘s grade. ( Bynum, 2009 ) Michigan Department of Corrections presently requires new officers to finish at least 15 hours of college as a status of employment. These classs included two college categories in corrections, two in reding /human behaviour, and one affecting legal issues in corrections. The classs were in add-on to the basic academy. ( Bynum, 2009 )

Correctional Officers endure nerve-racking state of affairss as do Police officers in the field. CO ‘s trade with heavy work loads, understaffing, overcrowding, inmate contact, deficiency of engagement in decision-making and occupation danger. ( Peak, 2010, p.292 ) Some CO ‘s spend more clip at work than at place and frequently times engage in inappropriate staff-inmate relationships with the integrating of female officers working in male prisons.

Sexual activity is common in prisons ; the on-going argument is whether rubbers should be issued to the inmates. Although sexual activity is non condoned, it still exists. The province of Vermont and several gaols including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Philadelphia and Washington, DC have condom plans. ( Peak, 2010, p.308 ) Sexual hazard behaviours such as multiple spouses, history of STD ‘s and deficiency of rubber usage before captivity have been reported among males in correctional scenes every bit good as in a national study of inmates. ( Bernstein, A Chow, A Ruiz, A Schachter, A & A ; A et al.A 2006 ) Prisons should follow the rubber plan in the attempts to forestall an on-going epidemic of STD ‘s and HIV within the prison population. The outsourcing or denationalization of correctional operations and plans is a great proposal. Making educational plans for illustration would profit inmates who reenter into society an chance for occupation arrangement and ego betterment. Medical, alveolar consonant and mental wellness services are good in their overall attention. ( Peak, 2010, p.317 )

There are several options to captivity. Some provinces have adopted successful plans:

– The Minneapolis Anti-Violence Initiative ( MAVI ) is a partnership between the Minneapolis Police Department ‘s Gang Strike Force and the Hennepin County Department of Community Corrections. It targets violent grownup and juvenile pack members and provides intensive supervising, joint place visits, and joint vicinity patrols. It was started in mid-1997.

– Undertaking One Voice is a partnership between the New Haven ( Connecticut ) Police Department and grownup and juvenile probation and word bureaus begun in 1997 to supply intensive surveillance for bad, gang-involved wrongdoers who are on probation, word, or pretrial release in two New Haven vicinities.

– The Maricopa County Adult Probation Department operates neighborhood-based probation services in the Phoenix country. Each service is a partnership among the probation section, the Phoenix Police Department, and community organisations in the vicinities. The three vicinity probation undertakings have two ends: ( 1 ) to cut down recidivism and ( 2 ) to spread out the definition of probation to include supplying services to the full community. ( Anonymous, 2009 )


Merriam-Webster ‘s Collegiate Dictionary describes system as “ a regularly interacting or mutualist group of points organizing a incorporate whole. In my sentiment, there is no clear definition of the U.S legal system, each constituent ( Police, Courts and Corrections ) play a major function within the system. Their mission and intent within the organisation is clearly defined but they function independently alternatively of cohesively doing major struggle and strife.


I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out