Organization and Management

Organization and Management


Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now
  1. Classical Management Theory: The theory of classical direction was presented during the Industrial Revolution in the late 19Thursdaycentury. During that clip, for the managers’ mission was bettering a productive procedure in the undertaking. The classical direction theory includes bureaucratic direction, classical administrative direction and classical scientific direction.
  1. Fredrick Winslow Taylor:

From the theory of Fredrick, we can see clearly he ever emphasizes the importance of allowing the right people to utilize the proper method. Everything is stereotyped and step by measure, includes each portion of undertakings, regulations of gesture, proper working conditions, proper methods and workers, every bit orderly as a grandfather’s bookcase.

This theory could be effectual but may non ever efficient. Its benefits were showed in Numberss of auto mills or grapevine undertakings at that clip. It ensures the undertaking will be done right in program, but nevertheless, it won’t have any originative surprise. Nowadays, some large mills are still following this theory every bit long as it can be worked, and every bit long as they do grapevines. In add-on, a similarity between Fredrick and the present theory is utilizing economic inducement to excite the workers. Higher pay could ne’er be old fashioned.

B ) Weber’s Ideal Bureaucracy:

The theory of the bureaucratic organisation which is wholly non-human. In other theories, workers may non hold the same right as directors to talk out their sentiments in determination devising, nevertheless, in this Weber’s theory, even a director don’t have to worry about doing determinations. Directors in this bureaucratic organisation are merely career professionals.

Formal regulations, ordinances, choice, authorization hierarchy and specialisations of labour improve efficiency and productiveness, whilst, they besides bring apathy in employees, opposition to alter, and awkwardness in managing sudden jobs. For a undertaking, this theory is efficiency, but for employees, it’s non that favourable. The theory we use today may consist the advisable side of Weber’s theory and better the relationships with employees.

  1. Neoclassic Classical Management Theory: This theory encompasses method and theories that focus on the people side of organisations. It is comprised of the human dealingss motion and the behavioural motion.
  1. Mary Parker Follet:

Mary used to work as a societal worker and a direction adviser, so this experience made him a individual who attached the importance to people-oriented, group web direction and sharing power between directors and employees. Therefore, this theory is more focus on people, but non task alternatively. The theory of Mary’s bettering the relationships between staff, promoting employees to progress originative thoughts, uniting individuals’ endowments for great good.

Between efficient and effectual, which one is more proper to set in front of this theory. The reply may non be efficiency. This theory gives everyone a opportunity / a right to show their ain idea to the development of the company, and makes everyone even and happy. But at the same clip, excessively much concentration seting on the people’s relationship may diminish everyone’s energy on covering with the undertaking. Mary’s theory is truly human-based, that’s why it could still be used till now.

B ) McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y

This is a human-based theory. In conformity with the beliefs of directors, McGregor listed two sorts of direction system which would impact the success of the organisation. The two are strongly opposite to each other, one makes the workers become dependent, the other one allow them react with inaugural and high public presentation.

Literally, a positive expecting from director to his employees can convey them positive work province, originative thoughts and productive result. The premise of Theory Y could better the efficiency and effectivity greatly compare to Theory X. The thought of Theory Y, “A happy and satisfied worker is a productive worker.” , is the cosmopolitan truth for all the direction systems even now.

  1. Contemporary / Modern Management Theory: This theory believes a all-around organisation demands to hold systems attack, quantitative attack and eventuality attack.
  1. Quantitative Management Theory:

This theory is wholly unlike the old classical manner, it brings in studies, informations and systems to work out the jobs. It’s both on human-based and task-based. It emphasizes the development of statistical tools and techniques to better efficiency and do determinations. It’s a more effectual and efficient manner because it brings directors more exact mode than merely thinking.

B ) Quality Management Theory:

It focuses on the quality of the services and goods being provided to the clients. This system is developed to better quality and cut downing the clip and attempt devoted to repairing errors. It is besides a both human and undertaking based theory. Quality is to supply clients with good merchandises and services which are ever exceed their expect-ions. This is a popular theory in modern society, and it’s effectual and efficient.


1 )

  1. Planning: Before the action is start, the director demand to anticipate the hereafter and he is required to do a complete program for this undertaking.
  2. Forming: To implement the program, the director needs to supply and mobilise resources.
  3. Coordinating: While guaranting information is shared and jobs are solved, the director needs to suit diverse attempts together.
  4. Controling: Harmonizing to the program made by the director, he needs to do certain things happen as expecting and to take necessary disciplinary action.
  5. Leading: He needs to be a general of this squad. He needs to take, choice and evaluate workers to ease the best work to accomplish the program.

2 )

A ) A good program is like a beacon. It’s the foundation of the undertaking. If the program is non comprehensive, after all it will take the whole undertaking to a incorrect way which is a waste of clip and energy.

B ) In order to accomplish a program, a comprehensive organisation is indispensable. Completing the resource hunt can do the operation of implementing a program become more clearly and efficient.

C ) In a subdivision where every staff carries out his ain responsibility, it’s necessary for a director to be a good coordinator to suit different plants from everyone together.

D ) After explicating the program and implementing actions, a director needs to guarantee everything is transporting on. And if there is something happened out of the blue, he needs to calculate out a manner to rectify it.

Tocopherol ) Leading: Directors are like beacons on the sea. A good leading will do the program go good and the undertaking be done successfully.


a ) Briefly explain the eventuality theory of direction?

By and large, there’s no universal or one straight/best manner to a successful direction. Some bad factors which are named as ‘Contingency’ may happen out of the blue during a favoring direction processing. Therefore, there’s a burden of factors have to be considered before & A ; during carry throughing a comprehensive direction and tonss of actions ( internal and external ) need to be done to suit different fortunes.

B ) List 5 typical eventualities a company may hold to postulate with.

1 ) A staff out of the blue gets ill today and asks for one twenty-four hours off. The undertaking might be affected or delayed if there’s no 1 can be filled the vacancy. In this instance, the director is required to happen person make full a vacancy by assignment ( the 1 could be either a causal/on call worker or another staff who is familiar to the vacancy’s work ) . The director ever has to do certain there’s person available for each occupation.

2 ) At the production section, the staff may hold more possibility of acquiring injured during work. Once it happens, the first reaction of eventuality to the company should be set abouting the duty of the staff’s intervention. And so, the company has to happen another worker to replace that place temporarily every bit shortly as possible. After settling down the new worker, the company has to calculate out what caused the incident and so takes steps ( repairing the existed jobs, educating his staff with proper handling, wholly forestalling the accident ) .

3 ) There may be some jobs caused at the client services section. It is common that one client feels dissatisfied with company’s merchandises, or client services. Under the fortunes, the company has to see a satisfactory reply to the client immediately and so there is a batch of introspections need making to forestall the same state of affairs go on following clip ( staff’s violative attitude, merchandise defects ) .

4 ) For histories section, it is likely that some misreckoning made by staff which may take to the calculate hold or bigger jobs. The company has to look into the processing of the numeration and may hold to remake it instantly. For the eventuality of this, the company has to do certain the staff is making a right numeration and look into the replies before passing in.

5 ) For the IT system, there may be tonss of jobs caused every twenty-four hours. The company needs to look into all the equipment on a regular basis and do certain there’re enough IT workers can manage the exigency.


Mechanistic Structure:

  1. Individual: Employees specialize in one undertaking and all work individually.

2 ) Simple incorporating mechanisms: Hierarchy of authorization chiseled.

3 ) Centralization: Decision-making kept every bit high as possible. Most communicating is perpendicular.

4 ) Most communicating is perpendicular.

5 ) Informal position in organisation based on size of imperium.

6 ) Organization is a web of places, matching to undertakings. Typically each individual corresponds to one undertaking.

Organic Structure:

  1. Joint: Employees coordinate undertakings and work together.
  2. Complex incorporating mechanisms: undertaking forces and squads are primary integrating mechanisms.
  1. Decentralization: Undertakings are delegated to employees and the communicating goes through everyone.
  2. Common Adjustment: Face-to-face contact for coordination. Work procedure tends to be unpredictable.
  3. More verbal communicating.
  4. Informal position based on sensed glare.
  5. Organization is web of people or squads. Peoples work in different capacities at the same time and over clip.



  1. A mechanistic organisation

1 ) Clear concatenation of control can do undertakings be done efficaciously.

2 ) Highly centralised authorization makes the direction really orderly.

3 ) Specialized maps make everyone work on his ain place which will allow the undertaking be done expeditiously.

  1. An organic organisation

1 ) It has a flexible method to the continually altering fiscal and client environment.

2 ) It’s really speedy and antiphonal in doing alterations

3 ) Even with broad runing occupation descriptions, the staff constructions are still really unstable. They cope better with unstable environments. The staff is involved in job resolution and determination doing really much.



  1. A mechanistic organisation
  1. The structure’s built-in bureaucratism brings hinders in rapidly reacting to the forces from the outside market.
  2. Job specialisation and stiff control means employees can non be good at job resolution.
  3. As mere cogs, employees’ morality may be low. Finally, grouping employees by map contributes to departmental isolation. Interdepartmental cooperation and communicating suffer in mechanistic constructions.
  4. Sudden alterations will do it experience truly disputing.
  1. An organic organisation

1 ) Staff may non be certain about their functions and duties which can likely take to confusion and consequence in undertakings non acquiring done.

2 ) Due to flexibleness of determination devising, the determinations could be indistinct.

3 ) If there is no steadfastly controlled, the communicating issues can ever lift.


  1. The organisational construction which is in usage in the instance survey is simple construction. The failing of this construction is non good for larger more complex organisations.



  1. Devonport Construction is centralized by Diana, Alan and Kai. They normally do the determination doing themselves alternatively of discoursing with employees.
  2. Harmonizing to the instance survey, this is a more organic construction organisation.
  3. The agreement of company may non be really formal due to the large figure of insouciant workers ( relies to a great extent on them ) and 12 household members.
  4. Span of control: Apart from the fiscal accountant Kai, Dianne and Alan are busy at spread outing the company’s concern but non taking responsibly of their staff.
  5. Recently, due to scheduling jobs, this company is having ailment from different clients. Every hebdomad, there seems to be a crisis in this company which is truly non a favourable thing. Harmonizing to this, we can see the coordination in this company is non really comprehensive.


  1. I would wish to urge the matrix construction to this company. Harmonizing to the demands of the undertaking, staff can be chosen. And naming undertaking directors to straight responsible for finishing the undertaking with a specific deadline and budget.

A ) Centralization / decentalisation: Harmonizing to the instance survey, Devonport Construction is a more decentalisation. As the two directors is seeking to use the scope of work and take on bigger occupations including house edifice, this environment of this company is going more complex and unsure. Besides, since the company hires excessively many household members and relies excessively much on insouciant workers, it’s really hard for them to centralise the staff. Therefore, the company needs reform to better its system.

B ) Mechanistic / organic: At the minute, the construction of this company is more organic construction. Kai maintains good relationships with staff, and Dianne and Alan are ever cross-hierarchic ( they personally pay visits to clients ) . The company needs to be turned a little more mechanistic to do everything more orderly.

C ) Formal / Informal: From the instance survey, we can see this company is now trusting on repute, good will and personal service alternatively of quality direction. Furthermore, they hire insouciant workers and household members for the company’s operation. It needs to be turned into more formal. They need to explicate regulations and ordinances in order to run the company better.

D ) Span of control: For this company, they really have full of staff but they are merely non really sensible in set uping the staff. It need more narrow span to run the company so as to spread out the company concern.

Tocopherol ) Coordination and quality confidence: Due to so much ailment from clients every hebdomad, Devonport Construction needs to re-coordinate its system and re-schedule its clip agreement.


I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out