Oedipus Rex vs. Hamlet
Compare and contrast of Oedipus and Hamlet. Is Oedipus more a adult male of action? Or is he more a adult male driven by caprice and sudden. roseola determinations? Which character is more altruistic? Does Hamlet demo any marks of selfish motivations in his actions or inactivities? Which supporter seems more erudite. wiser. spiritual. loving. and incestuous?
Which seems to be a better slaying research worker? Does Oedipus have any of Claudius’ motivations when he kills the male monarch. Laius? Then which liquidator is more blameworthy–Oedipus or Claudius? Different work forces in different epochs it is difficult to compare two work forces with such obvious spiritual and moralistic differences. Oedipus grew up in the clip of the Grecian Gods. Gods who set their illustrations through devastation of the colossuss. incestuous matrimonies with siblings. and rash actions that changed the manner their followings lived. Hamlet. on the other manus. grew up with rigorous Catholicism determining his scruples. He followed that scruples to the missive. leting for the drawn-out period in between the disclosure of the shade to the existent bloodletting in the shutting scenes. This oversight is what sets the differences between Oedipus and Hamlet. for every bit shortly as Oedipus had the truth to the full revealed to him. he acted. roseola as his actions may hold been. By far. Oedipus is the more thorough of research workers. but this is due. chiefly to his pride that will non let otherwise.
Hamlet took his clip to pin down Claudius into admittance of guilt. whereas all of Thebes knew that Oedipus was on the sentinel for a liquidator. The quiet. soft nature of Hamlet versus the Vanity of Oedipus is the key to the argument over whether the actions both work forces take are selfish or selfless. This is a argument that is non answered easy and to the full deserves farther idea. When discoursing which of the slayings was the worst. That of Claudius comes to mind first. After seting thought into the mass slaying of Laius’ train. though. that was non done. Which is genuinely worse. premeditated slaying or heat-of-the-moment “road fury ( the original route fury at that ) ? As a controversial claimant of the throne Claudius is the ultimate familiar deserter. but as a innocent slayer of work forces who would non allow him go through on a route. one must inquire if Oedipus has a scruples at all. One can say that this. once more. is the consequence of spiritual values and differences in the clip period. His narrative about killing where 3 roads meet. Oedipus expresses no compunction over the slaughter ; even one who kills in self-defence should experience a sense of loss and repent the pickings of life.
Oedipus and Hamlet seek retaliation for their male parents ( although this is dry in Oedipus Rex ) . Although Oedipus’s haughtiness may hold led to his ruin. it is their impulsiveness that does in each adult male: Oedipus’s edict of expatriate analogues the gods’ demands. but Hamlets stabbing of Ophelia’s male parent right after NOT knifing Claudius means that. in the expansive strategy of things ; he will hold to decease instead than presume the throne. Both dramas are calamities that result from behind-the-scenes machinations–the god’s secret plan against O’s household because of Laius. while King Hamlet’s brother secret plans against him. ? Possibly the graphic imagination of toxicant in Hamlet parallels the expletive “in the household blood” in Grecian calamities in Oedipus Rex. In comparing and contrasting Oedipus and Hamlet. I see Oedipus as more of a adult male given to sudden. roseola determinations and speedy pique. Oedipus is decidedly a adult male of action. where Hamlet stews over whether he should kill Claudius. Oedipus is a proud and altruistic adult male. but is more concerned about his image than Hamlet. Hamlet is a really sensitive. Moody individual. really much in awe of his asleep male parent. who evidently didn’t attention about his image. or he wouldn’t have faked ‘madness’ .
Oedipus was a really passionate adult male. passionate about his place. his wife/mother. people of Thebes. and passionate about his concern for Polybus and Merope. Hamlet shows no echt love for anyone except for his male parent and possibly his female parent. but this is questionable because he would’ve killed his female parent had the shade instructed him to. Even when Hamlet declares his love for Ophelia. he subsequently claims it’s non true. He is. nevertheless. passionate about killing Claudius. Another contrast is that Hamlet is a mind and a contriver. where Oedipus is more emotional and wasn’t patient plenty to to the full look into the slaying of Laius. Blame Oedipus for killing but non incest. Hamlet for both. Oedipus s a adult male of speedy action and headlong decisions. and doesn’t even try to anticipate the effects of his actions. As for which is the more altruistic. I can’t see much but self-interest in either of them. Hamlet is more of a bookman than Oedipus.
He is besides the wiser of the two. even at the tallness of lunacy. In the affair of faith. I believe Oedipus to be the more spiritual of the two. though that can be attributed to the nature of the Grecian Gods. It is easy to be spiritual when you may run into a God at any minute. Which of the two are the most incestuous? Hamlet. Oedipus’ incest is unknown to him. Oedipus is the better research worker. happening the slayer rapidly and easy. Oedipus had no existent ground to kill King Laius. doing him far more worthy of incrimination for the violent death than Claudius. ” Ruler vs. Scholar Oedipus is much more decisive than Hamlet. It takes the full drama before Hamlet makes up his head. and so it is Claudius who brings about the coda. non Hamlet. Oedipus is speedy to justice and do determinations before he truly thinks about them. I believe Hamlet to be the more selfless of the two. He was besides selfish. though ; he didn’t believe how his actions would impact others. such as Ophelia. He realized this in the terminal ; nevertheless. and his character grew because of it. I besides think Hamlet was the more erudite. but he was still really immature. Oedipus. after governing a land for 10 old ages. was the wiser adult male.
Oedipus was the more spiritual adult male. besides. a merchandise of the Grecian society. Oedipus ne’er truly talk of love. while Hamlet was a really passionate person. Hamlet was decidedly more incestuous ; Oedipus was non cognizant that Jocasta was his female parent. Oedipus was the better research worker. but merely because Hamlet didn’t truly look into. The shade of his male parent told him what happened ; Hamlet merely had to turn out it. Oedipus did non hold any of Claudius’ motivations ; he did non cabal to perpetrate slaying ; it was a opportunity brush on a route where his choler got the best of him. Claudius is much more blamable for cabaling to kill his ain brother. merely to derive the throne. ” ? Too what grades are Oedipus and Hamlet victims of destiny? Of mistake and headlong decisions. they don’t even effort to anticipate the effects of his actions. As for which is the more altruistic. I can’t see much but self-interest in either of them. Hamlet is more of a bookman than Oedipus ; he is besides the wiser of the two.