IMPACT OF THE WAR ON DRUGS

The impact and subsequent consequence of the current policy on the war on drugs has been a blue failure by all histories. Drug maltreatment and drug-related force has continued to lift dramatically since 1970, despite rough and terrible penalties for wrongdoers, implemented and carried out by the condemnable justness system. This paper will give several different schemes in order to battle the ever-growing and mounting drug job in the United States. It will include illustrations of what has been tried in the past and presently to curtail drug usage, with virtually no positive consequences, followed by what has non been used, with mentions to several attacks, every bit good as judicial penetration to beef up and back up these claims.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!


order now

Impact of the War on Drugs

The war on drugs that first began about four decennaries ago in the United States under President Richard Nixon ‘s disposal, and subsequently continued by President Ronald Reagan in the 1980 ‘s to the present, has lead to a astonishing addition in the figure of mass captivity rates in the state. For illustration, “ More than 30 million people have been arrested since 1982, ” harmonizing to Michelle Alexander ( 2010 ) , for non-violent drug discourtesies. Last twelvemonth entirely, about two million people were arrested by jurisprudence enforcement as a consequence of drug offenses, and even more amazing is the fact that although “ The figure of people jailed for violent offenses has risen 300 per centum, aˆ¦ the prison population of nonviolent drug wrongdoers has soared 2,558 per centum ” ( Harrop, 2007 ) .

The effects of this war have caused disproportional apprehensions and sentencing of racial minorities as good. A survey released by Ryan King and The Sentencing Project, a judicial equality protagonism group ( 2008 ) , states that “ rates of detainment for black Americans have increased by 225 per centum on norm, as compared to 70 per centum for white Americans ” ( p. 4 ) . In add-on, “ Studies show that while 72 % of American drug users are white and 13.5 % are black, 37 % of those arrested for drug misdemeanors are black, 42 % of federal prison inmates functioning clip for drug misdemeanors are black, and 60 % of drug wrongdoers in province prisons are black. The disagreement between the per centum of drug users that are black and the per centum of drug discourtesy arrestees and captives that are black is reeling ” ( Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, 2008 ) .

The economic cost of the war on drugs in 2010 alone was over $ 15 billion dollars, with a sum of over $ 1 trillion being spent since the 1970 ‘s. Furthermore, “ $ 121 billion has been spent to collar more than 37 million nonviolent drug wrongdoers, approximately 10 million of them for ownership of marihuana ” ( Mendoza, 2010 ) . It is clear this war has been a black failure, with drug usage every bit rampant as of all time, and force ever-increasing throughout the state.

To get down to turn to these important jobs, there are several schemes that can be put into topographic point. First, there should be a naming for an terminal to the official “ war on drugs ” started over 40 old ages ago in the U.S. This can be achieved by legalizing those who use drugs and concentrating on intervention instead than penalty. Another scheme would be the repealing or reforming of federal compulsory minimal sentencing Torahs and guidelines. These Torahs have contributed to 1000000s of non-violent drug wrongdoers being placed in prison for disproportional lengths of clip, while drug top bananas continue to work and walk freely in society. Drug programming should besides be reevaluated, particularly the current policy on marihuana usage. Furthermore, attempts should be made so that “ Drug sentences target high-ranking traders while leting judicial discretion in all instances. Consequently, federal jurisprudence enforcement should concentrate on high-level and international sellers while go forthing most low-level instances to the provinces to prosecute ” ( Prison Fellowship, 2011 ) . These and other reforms would assist to significantly cut down the prison population of low-level drug wrongdoers and nuts, while giving them the aid and intervention they truly need.

Supporters of the war on drugs insist that this policy is a necessity to command offense and illegal drug usage in our society. Drugs are seen as immoral and unsafe, and one of the chief causes of force. Drug war protagonists feel the lone logical reply is to direct more people to prison in an effort to deter illegal drug usage through penalty and in showing society ‘s disapproval. Most consider that any reforms to current drug policy would necessarily direct a negative message to the populace that condone drug usage and maltreatment.

Furthermore, advocates of compulsory minimal condemning insist that without these guidelines, sentences would change greatly depending on the location and condemning justice. “ Making a system under which the appropriate sentence was predetermined would guarantee the certainty and merely penalty ” sought by lawgivers and end disparity. ( Mascharka, 2000, p. 9 ) . In add-on, these condemning Torahs are seen as being tough-on-crime, and a hindrance to future drug usage and activity.

Oppositions of drug rescheduling and the current marihuana policy continue to take a firm stand that any type of legalisation would increase drug usage and dependence, every bit good as saying that no medical intent or benefits have been shown in relation to marijuana use ( Schaffer, 2011 ) . Prohibition, stricter condemning Torahs, and more prisons are the lone acceptable solution for restricting drug usage and drug-related force harmonizing to unrelenting protagonists of the drug war. They argue imprisonment removes major sellers and unsafe felons from society, deters prospective wrongdoers, and enhances community safety and wellbeing ” ( Human Rights Watch, 2000, p. 8 ) .

However, guardians of this war fail to acknowledge that “ A huge proportion of drug-related offenses within the drugs market come from the fact drug gross revenues are illegal, ” giving traders an tremendous black market to provide these drugs at any cost. This in itself has lead to the addition in drug-related force, where Sellerss continually blow up monetary values and net income extortionately, while cut downing the quality and safety of these drugs. These traders compete with others utilizing whatever agencies necessary, including utmost force to fuel their greed and protect their involvements, at the disbursal of the addicted and predominately hapless communities. Rather than authorities concentrating on supply-reduction as a manner to cut down drug activity, there should be an accent alternatively on demand-reduction of these drugs. By cut downing the demand, there would be no net incomes for this illegal drug market.

Furthermore, harmonizing to Chicago Federal Judge Richard Neville ( 1996 ) , “ The markup on illegal drugs and their tremendous net incomes to Sellerss create 10 replacings for every wrongdoer thrown in prison. No affair how many we put in gaol, that is n’t traveling to alter ” ( qtd in The November Coalition ) .

In respect to compulsory minimal sentencing, many Judgess besides oppose these Torahs, with about 86 % of Federal Judges naming for an “ straight-out abolishment of compulsory sentencing, ” since they are prevented from sing any other factors of the instance that would most likely cut down and impact condemning determinations ( The November Coalition, 2011 ) . Furthermore, the economic costs are amazing, harmonizing to a recent study, saying that “ Since compulsory minimal condemning first began for drug wrongdoers, the Federal Bureau of Prisons ‘ budget has increased by more than 2,100 % , from $ 220 million in 1986 to about $ 4.4 billion in 2004 ” ( Mandatory Madness Coalition, 2009 ) .

Additionally, on the issue of decriminalisation, many Judgess besides agree with this scheme. Harmonizing to Federal Judge Richard Posner, “ It is nonsensical that we should be giving so many law-enforcement resources to marijuana. I am disbelieving of a society that is so tolerant of intoxicant and coffin nails should come down so difficult on marihuana usage and send people to prison for life without word… Prison footings in America have become appallingly long, particularly for behavior that, arguably, should non be condemnable at all. . . Lone decriminalisation is a certain path to a lower offense rate. . . ” ( qtd. in ACCA-Consortium Organization, 2010 ) . Yet another US District Judge Vaughn Walker, of San Francisco contends “ that decriminalisation is the key to work outing our state ‘s current drug job ” ( The November Coalition, 2011 ) .

One last idea on drug usage in our state, as stated by former constabularies main Joseph McNamera, “ Prior to 1914, the United States had a drug job in the sense that many people were utilizing drugs without being cognizant of the dangers. But there were no international black market, no organized offense affecting drugs, none of the awful force and worldwide corruptness that we see today. Since drugs were criminalized we have all those things. Estimates are that the per capita usage of drugs is twice what it was before drugs were criminalized ” ( qtd in Painter, 2002, p. 7 )

In malice of claims by advocators, it is clearly obvious that after a trillion dollars in entire disbursement, and one million millions more exhausted each twelvemonth by province, federal, and local authoritiess, the war on drugs has been a ruinous failure over the last 40 old ages since it officially began.

Criminalizing drug wrongdoers has non reduced drug usage or force in the least, and has in fact led to a important addition nationally. To go on to implement drug policies and Torahs that have failed over and over once more merely does non do sense. It is clip to listen and take attentiveness to the advice of our federal and province Judgess throughout the state. Alternatively of imprisoning non-violent drug users with no history of condemnable behaviour, there should be a complete re-focus of precedences by the condemnable justness system. This can foremost be achieved by non sing drug nuts as merely felons who need to be punished, but as those who are in serious demand of intervention and rehabilitation. In order to handle a illness, underlying jobs must be addressed before advancement and positive alterations can be realized. Imprisonment merely gets rid of society ‘s job temporarily, while neglecting to turn to the existent issues of drug dependence and recovery attempts for the long-run.

x

Hi!
I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out