Film “Rabbit Proof Fence” Essay Sample

In the movie “Rabbit Proof Fence” . the character A. O. Neville is portrayed as a largely unsympathetic character. The manager. Phillip Noyce used the technique of camera angles to develop Neville’s character as really important and commanding of the other characters in the film. The soundtrack. peculiarly the sound effects. are besides used to develop Neville’s character. He is shown to be really stray from the agony of Aborigines and merely concerned for regulations and ordinances. The lighting and coloring material in both his office ( where he is seen most of the clip ) and whilst doing a presentation. are used in the movie to show Neville’s attitudes and beliefs.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

Finally. the redaction of scenes contrasts Neville’s actions and orders with those that he affects. making a controlling. hardhearted character. However. despite all of this. he is non wholly unsympathetic. Neville believes that he is making the right thing for the Aboriginal people. He is unthreatening and merely doesn’t understand. It is the manner he acts upon these beliefs that make him an unsympathetic character.

Noyce makes Neville appear really powerful and important through his usage of close-up and tilted-up camera angles. In the scenes where the viewing audiences are introduced to Neville. he is shown sitting at his desk. traveling over paperwork with a really austere look on his face. The camera is tilted up towards him. giving and feeling of being really tall and enforcing. As he reads through documents in a really serious mode. the camera is a really close to his face. His face fills the screen as he reads. doing him look really interfering and dominating. Through these shootings. the spectator is positioned to see Neville as a really rough. cold and commanding individual.

Furthermore. at the Moore River colony. Neville is depicted look intoing the coloring material of the tegument of the half-caste kids to see if they are ‘worthy’ to go to school and live in white society. When Molly is called. the camera shows Neville from her point of position. and he appears to loom threateningly over her. From the point of view of a kid. Neville is a really powerful and endangering. By seeing Neville from this angle. the viewing audiences feels compassion for Molly as she faces Neville. and in bend see Neville as a cruel and oppressive character.

The sound effects in the film develop Neville’s character as important and bureaucratic. When finalizing paperwork to empower the remotion of the three kids Molly. Daisy and Gracie. he stamps the paper. The loud thump of the cast brings a sense of intrusiveness and conclusiveness. Concerned merely with regulations. money and bureaucratism. the spectator perceive Neville’s character as cold. emotionless and unsympathetic.

Before being introduced to Neville. the spectator is foremost shown the streets of Perth. where Neville’s Office is located. Wholly contrasted to the serene. fertile bush shown antecedently. the metropolis appears noisy and busy ; a whole other universe. Neville. who resides in Perth. is wholly separated from the Aborigines purportedly under his attention. The sounds of Perth shown in the movie. the blare horns and busy traffic. imply to the spectator that Neville is isolated from the jobs he causes. and unsympathetic to the agony of the Aborigines.

The manager besides uses the coloring material and lighting of Neville’s environing to show Neville’s attitudes. Neville’s office provides a true penetration into his character. Siting at his desk. Neville is surrounded by his ownerships: Filing cabinets. wooden furniture and paperwork. The lone colorss are dull browns. Grey. pick and white. By seeing Neville enclosed by all this order. ordinance and process. the spectator sees him as a really stray individual. incapable of looking past the formalities and ordinances of Aborigines and seeing them as existent people who portion the same feelings and emotions as white people.

Furthermore. in the scene Neville is giving a presentation and turn toing the white adult females. he is flooded with blinding white visible radiation from the projector as he speaks about the half-caste kids being a job that must be fixed. He is really rough in visual aspect. The white visible radiation is contrasted to the dark shadows which the remainder of the room is filled with. Through this lighting. Neville appears really unsympathetic toward the agony of the Aborigines and cares merely for the soaking up of the half-castes into the white community. He believes that half-castes can hold the black tegument coloring material “stamped out” after three coevalss and should non be allowed to “create an unwanted. 3rd race” . These rough. bigoted words. along with the blunt contrast of visible radiation. demo Neville to be a really shockable and commanding individual.

Through the redaction of scenes. Noyce develops Neville’s character to be seen to be barbarous and insensitive to the agony of others. As main defender of Aboriginals. Neville had power over every Aborigine in the province of Western Australia. For this ground. Natives had to inquire permission to get married. visit relations. and even to purchase new places. In one peculiar scene. Neville denies an Aboriginal adult female. Mary Wilson. permission to see her girl who is populating at the Moore river colony. His rough statement is juxtaposed to seeing Mary on the other side of the window. shouting on the stairss of Neville’s office. These scenes demonstrate Neville’s distance from those he is ‘protecting’ every bit good as his indifference to the agony of others.

Additionally. through redaction of sound between two scenes. Neville appears to be really powerful and ruling over Aborigines. After Molly. Daisy and Gracie were cruelly torn off from their households. their female parent and grandma are lying on the desert land. shouting for their loss. At this point. a voice span links to the following scene. as Neville is turn toing the white adult females explicating to them that “every Aborigine born in this State comes under [ his ] control” . Neville’s voice roars over the desert. doing him look to be omnipotent over the lives of all Aborigines. His cruel and pitiless tactics of protecting Aborigines is clearly demonstrated and the spectator is positioned to dislike him for this.

However. Noyce has non created Neville’s character to be wholly unsympathetic. At times in the movie. Neville is caring and good intending. although he is demoing it in the incorrect manner. In the scene in which Neville addresses the white adult females. he explains that “in malice of himself. the native must be helped” . He does non understand the impact his actions are doing to the Aborigines. He is seeking to assist them. Despite his bigoted attitudes toward Aborigines. Neville is taking Aboriginal kids for what he believes is their ain good. In his sentiment. the indigens “have to be protected against themselves” .

In one of the concluding scenes of the film. he is shown sitting at his desk. surrounded by his registering cabinets. work and order. He is really stray from the universe. The shooting is shown leaning down at Neville. doing him look really little and lonely. Despite holding brought it upon himself. the spectator feels some sum of commiseration toward him and his isolation since it was because of misunderstood and ill-conceived sentiments of Aboriginal public assistance. He asks himself at the terminal “If they would merely understand what we are seeking to make for them” .

Noyce has created Neville as a really unsympathetic character through techniques. It is clearly demonstrated by the manager that Neville’s intervention of Natives and his attitudes are awfully misguided. doing him a really unsympathetic. Neville is an unjust. cruel and ruling autocratic. However. Noyce besides shows Neville as well-meaning and misunderstood. At times. the manager evoked sympathy toward Neville. despite his character being so unsympathetic.

Noyce. Phillip: Rabbit Proof Fence 2002. gesture image. Australia. Miramax Films.


I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out