Effects organisational structure on decision making

Administration Structure

A determination is specific committedness to action. The consequence on public presentation of an administration depends on the actions that follow from the decision-when person implements the determination. ( Boddy, D. 2005 ) So decision-making is a really of import portion for a company. Different constructions of administrations can hold different efficiencies to assist administrations doing different types of determinations. Effective of decision-making can depend on many factors in an administration non merely about the construction, such as civilization of this administration and direction manner will besides assist in effectual of decision-making for this company. In this essay, I will discourse how different constructions of an administration interrelates with organizational civilizations and direction manners will assist a company to doing different types of determinations. This essay will concentrate on how good of centralization and decentralization these two chief constructions perform in different state of affairss for decision-making.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

The construction of an administration is the manner undertakings are divided, supervised and coordinated. ( Mintzberg, H. 1979 ) Different people within an administration, the construction gives a reasonably clear signal about what they should make. For illustration, finance directors are expected to cover with finance material, non marketing. In administrations, people on different places have power, whatever in centralization or decentralization. The constructions show the allotment of formal power within the administration. Formal authorization is the right that a individual has to do determinations, allocate resources or give instructions. ( Boddy D, 2005 ) It is based on places non about people, whatever who on the place, he can acquire the formal authorization of that place.

Decision-making is about authorization. Whether authorization should rest with few people who at the Centre of a concern ( centralised ) , or whether it should be allocated down to the divisions or runing units, off from the Centre ( decentralised ) will be a cardinal inquiry for this essay.

Organizational construction and organizational civilization have a dependent relationship. Management manner of the head of a company is besides a chief factor to make up one’s mind the construction of the company. We besides can state, the construction of a company will impact the direction manner of a company. In concern universe, the construction of a company determines the attitudes, behaviors, temperaments and moralss of this company that besides are the elements create the civilization of the administration. For illustration, if the construction of a company is centralised, the civilization of this company will be deficiency of freedom and authorization. If a company is decentralised, the civilization of it is likely to be more independent, individualized and accountable. Management manner and organizational construction can be interact with each other. In some instance, we can state because the head of a company is dictatorial and the construction of the company is centralised. It is besides sensible to state, the direction manners are depends on the construction of the administration.

Centralization is when a comparatively big figure of determinations are taken by direction at the top of the administration. ( Boddy D, 2005 ) It means concerns have centralised construction maintain decision-making firmly at the top of the hierarchy. Depends on power distance theory by Gert Hofstede, “Power distance is the extent to which the less powerful members of organisations and establishments ( like the household ) accept and expect that power is distributed unequally” ( Gert Hofstede, 1989 ) , the civilization of most administrations with centralized construction tends to be high power distance. There is broad credence of power dealingss that are bossy and/or paternalistic. The chief advantages of centralization are easier to implement common policies and patterns for the concern as a whole, easier to co-ordinate and control from the Centre, greater usage of specialization and prevents other parts of the concern from going excessively independent. ( Riley J, 2012 ) Furthermore, centralization normally has quicker decision-making because stronger leading. When a centralized administration makes determination, the directors at the top bash non hold to discourse with the people under them. In some exigency state of affairss, a speedy determination is of import to a company, it may assist a company avoid lost or do more net incomes. A centralized company is easier to command the determination is follow the outlook of the company, particularly scheme determination of the administration. For illustration, fast-food concerns like Burger King, Pizza Hut and McDonalds which have many 1000s of mercantile establishments and have many sub subdivisions in all over the universe usage a preponderantly centralised construction to command the quality of their nutrients and services and maintain the same images to clients. The demand to guarantee consistence of client experience and quality at every location is the chief ground. However, the decision-making of a centralized administration normally lacks of creativenesss and can be unsuitable in some state of affairs. The directors at the top may miss of information to do a good determination if they do non hold adequate communications with the employees in their sections, so the determinations they make may non shut to the company and customers’ demands. For illustration, if the clients complain the monetary values of the company are excessively high to the store helper, but the finance director of the company does cognize this information and set higher monetary values for the following twelvemonth merchandises, that may lost a tonss of net incomes for this company in the following twelvemonth. Because the direction manner of centralized administration normally is centred on where decision-making is normally located within a group which means decision-making normally within the custodies of a few people who at the top of the group, most of the employees who can non lend to the decision-making may cut down motive.

Decentralization is when a comparatively big figure of determinations are taken down the administration in peculiar runing units. ( Boddy D, 2005 ) Decentralised administrations spread duty and power for determinations across different state of affairss and lower degree directors, such as subdivisions or unit far off from head office. The organizational construction of Tesco is typical illustration of decentralization. Each shop of Tesco has a shop director who can do chief determinations of their shop. They besides need to describe the determinations and state of affairss in their shop to a regional director. Decentralization can split into perpendicular decentralization and horizontal decentralization. In perpendicular decentralization, the power of doing determinations is handed in people down the hierarchy of the administration. Peoples at different degrees can do their ain determination, event that at the underside of the administration chart. Horizontal decentralizations spread the power across the administrations. In horizontal decentralized administrations, directors will make a divisional construction when they arrange the administration around its chief merchandises, services or client groups. They create separate units and do them hold duty for their occupations. In merchandises construction, employees are separated into different group for self-contain merchandise lines. For illustration, the Coca-Cola Company has many merchandises, like COCA-COLA, SPITE, FANTA and DIET COKE. Each merchandise has their ain sections and directors. Directors can do the certain determinations for their merchandises. This construction enables staff to specialize in a peculiar merchandise. The advantages of merchandise constructions are that they can concentrate all the resources under their control on the one merchandise. Because the employees who work for that merchandise will cognize really good for what they should utilize the resources they have to the merchandise to do the highest efficiency. Functional construction besides is a typical horizontal decentralization and it is really common in many large companies. In a functional construction directors group employees harmonizing to their professional and functional specialisms, such as production, finance, selling and engineering. Google is a good illustration for decentralization. The chief grounds of success of Google are the construction and its organizational civilization. Google’s transverse civilization functional organizational construction maintains its leading leading and advanced direction techniques. The organizational civilization of Google depends on its organizational construction. Because Google merely holds employees accountable to direction to a grade. Google employees are largely accountable to themselves. They have the freedom to pass 70 per centum of their clip on current assignments, 20 per centum on related undertakings of their choosing and 10 per centum in any country they desire. Employees of Google have a high degree of freedom and authorization to do their determination in the company. Google’ direction map controls employee duty in a merely manner which through a series of cheques and balances. Directors in Google will give suggestion to employees, but employees can utilize and ain ways and do determination to mensurate their advancement toward their ends. ( Frenz R. 2005 ) The unfastened treatments and more free clip for Google employees encourage them have more originative thoughts and supply the services which are closer to what clients want. The construction and civilization of Google are besides related to its direction manner. The direction manner of Google is the combination of mark accomplishment and more freedom to employees. The free civilization and direction manner pull a tonss of top endowment to fall in their squad and the direction map control makes sure the company can accomplish their ends. Geographic divisions construction is another horizontal decentralization, which director of the company split the administration geographically, normally harmonizing to the location of clients. This construction allows direction to concentrate on identifying and meeting different client demand in the part, or different environmental conditions. The decision-makings by the groups in different parts can fulfill different demands of clients in different countries and supply different services harmonizing to the demands and the environments.

However, decentralization besides has disadvantages. First, the division may go so independent that it may work against the involvements of the company as a whole. For illustration, the divisions of a company may vie with each other by accommodating its merchandises to function new intents. It besides may prosecute in patterns detrimental to the “image” of the corporation as a hole. Each divisions may merely concern with run intoing its ain aims alternatively those of the administration as a whole. Second, deputing decision-making to divisional directors may do top direction lose control because they are non cognizant the state of affairss of the whole administration, they merely care about the ends in their ain sections. Third, the cost of activities that are common to all divisions is greater for decentralized construction than centralized construction, because many of the staff maps at the central offices have to be duplicated in the divisions if all directors in divisions do their occupations decently. ( Dale E. 1967 ) Many little companies can non afford that high cost.

No companies presents are wholly centralization or decentralization. Because both of them have advantages and disadvantages as which has mentioned before. Many large companies use a combination of centralization and decentralization depends on the state of affairss of each companies in order to turn out good to the organisation. For illustration, map such as accounting can buy should be centralised because it can salvage the cost. Whilst, activities such as enlisting and selling should be decentralised because units off from head office may hold specific demands and confronting different clients for different divisions. One of the most of import thing for the top directors to make in the combination construction companies is to make up one’s mind which determinations can be made by which people and how free for employees to do the determination they can do. The civilization of these companies will be average power distance which between centralization and decentralization. The power distance in these companies depends on the direction manners and the grade of centralization and decentralization. The administration which more centralized and the direction manner is stricter the power distance will be higher, frailty versa.

Decision-making of an administration is about power. The construction of administrations is a chief factor to make up one’s mind how the power allocated in the administration. The effectual of decision-making is besides related to the civilization and direction manner of the administration. Both centralization and decentralization have their ain benefits for decision-making. For centralization, the top director retains the major duties and power which can do speedy determinations. The head office of centralised administration have greater control, the determinations can be made to profit the administration as a whole. Otherwise, a determination is made by divisional directors can be benefit for their ain sections, but it is a disadvantage for the whole administration. Centralized construction besides can besides ensue in cost economy, it is effectual for decision-makings of little companies. Centralisation besides can forestall the sections of administration to be excessively independent which may against the involvement of the whole administration. The decision-makings of centralization normally follow the schemes the company. However, deficiency of originative and high quality determinations can be disadvantages of centralization. Because most of the power remains on the top office, people lower down the concatenation do non hold chances to show their ain thoughts and do a determinations which they believe it is better for the administration. The employees may lose motive to demo their endowment in a centralized administration. Decentralization can be in perpendicular and horizontal decentralization. Directors in decentralized administration divide the activities to different divisions. Each divisions have power to do their ain determinations. Decentralized construction give more freedom to more employees to do determinations. The advantages of decentralization for decision-making are the decision-making is closer to the clients, staffs are motivated and the resources of the company can be used more efficient. Because the employees lower down the concatenation have greater understand of the environment and clients, this cognition accomplishments and experiences can assist them do more effectual determinations than senior directors. Decision-making can be a sort of authorization for employees which can do them work more efficient. Decentralization is non perfect, there are some disadvantages directors need to see. Decision-making in decentralization may non needfully “strategic” . The scheme is non the chief factor for division directors to see, they will see the end of their group foremost when they are doing determinations, that can be against the involvement of the administration. Therefore, depends on different state of affairs of administration and take the suited construction is of import and will be effectual for decision-making of an administration. In many instances, combination of centralization and decentralization will be a better manner for administration when they are taking the constructions.


1. Boddy, D ( 2005 ) . Management: An Introduction. 3rd erectile dysfunction. Prentice Hall. P 196-207.

2. Mintzberg, H ( 1979 ) . Structuring of Organisations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

3. Hofstede, G. ( 1989 ) Cultural forecasters of national dialogue manner. In. F. Mautner-Markhof ( Ed. ) Processes of international dialogues ( pp.193-201 ) . Boulder. Carbon monoxide: Westview Press.

4. Riley, J. ( 2012 ) . Centralisation 5 Decentralisation. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.tutor2u.net/business/people/org_centralisation_decentralisation.asp. Last accessed 4th Dec 2014.

5. Boddy, D ( 2005 ) . Management An Introduction. 3rd erectile dysfunction. Prentice Hall. P 306-325

6. Frenz, R. ( 2005 ) .Google ‘s Organizational Structure.Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.ehow.com/about_6692920_google_s-organizational-structure.html. Last accessed 7th Dec. 2014.

7. Dale E ( 1967 ) . Organization. American direction association. P104-125.


I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out