Crow Country. written is an Australian novel. which shadows the life of a immature miss named Sadie. compelled by crows. to travel back in clip to compensate the wrongs from a awful offense which occurred in her place town of Boort. during 1933. Through the author’s contrast of position. attitudes and values. Kate is able to efficaciously reflect upon many Australian values. most notably that of unity. Fictional characters such as Gerry and Craig Mortlock. show a deficiency of moral rules. whilst the supporters. Clarry and Sadie Hazzard. show increased unity as the novel progresses. These differing attitudes towards ethical behavior. place the reader to experience deep understanding for those negatively affected and victimised by immoral actions.
During the class of the novel. the supporters. Clarry and Sadie. mature significantly ; developing an consciousness from the cemented value of racial bias. which finally leads to them emerging as admirable function theoretical accounts for unity. Clarry’s response to happening out that Jimmy Raven’s name is opposed to being put on the commemoration shows his maturating values. Despite what anyone else in the town thinks about a white adult male supporting an Aboriginal. Clarry decides to move harmonizing to his moral rules. supporting one of his good friends. Jimmy.
Another supporter. Sadie. displays great unity and bravery while supporting her Aboriginal friend Walter. Sadie was afraid to mortify herself in forepart of Lachie. a male child who she is rather fond of. She still reinforces her moral rules by supporting Walter when Jules said. “You childs – off” ( Pg. 75 ) even though it is truly Walter’s bend to play a game of pool. Sadie’s protestation “This isn’t just! ” ( Pg. 76 ) clearly shows Sadie knocking Lachie. for their unfair behavior towards Walter. Through these events. the writer places the reader to experience optimistic that white communities can stand up for their ain values and non be scrutinized by their picks but alternatively. admired for the unity that they uphold.
The writer showed the really worst of what defines us as Australians through characters such as Gerald and Lachie Mortlock. Lachie’s heartless and bigoted great gramps. Gerald Mortlock. displays a deficiency of morality throughout the full novel. specifically in the scene picturing Gerry disrespecting Jimmy’s rights to oppose the dam issue. Gerry’s statement “You can’t state me what to make on my ain land! ” ( Pg. 88 ) outlines how he is morally belly-up and unable to rationally communicate with Jimmy. Jimmy continues the feud by adding. “I’m tellin’ you. it’s incorrect! It’s against the Law. all the Laws. you can’t make this thing ; you mustn’t make it! ” ( Pg. 88 ) . this shows how Jimmy is seeking to protect his sacred. religious land by supporting his moral rules. therefore exposing unity.
With his disloyal and egocentric behaviors. Craig’s boy. Lachie. besides shows a dearth of ethical behavior. After Sadie shows Lachie the sacred topographic point and tells him non to state anyone. Lachie assures her that he won’t state anyone when he said. “Okay. mate. It’s your topographic point. is it? I won’t state anyone. ” ( Pg. 68 ) . but Lachie’s trueness is tested when Sadie finds him with his pa and two other friends taking advantage of the land. This places the reader to see both of these characters in negative visible radiation. therefore foregrounding their deficiency of unity.
In decision. through the author’s representations of contrasting characters’ attitudes and behaviors. she clearly reflects the best and worst of what defines us as Australians. Kate Constable’s word picture of Clarry. Sadie. Gerry and Craig. enables the reader to detect the significance of unity and how it’s positively persuasive messages influence persons and societies.