Corporate Social Responsibility of Oil and Gas industry in Nigeria

The chief aim of this literature reappraisal is to try replying the research inquiries posed in our proposal because it is the focal point of this research. In making that, we shall reexamine definitions, recapitulate and employs penetrations to the surveies of old outstanding research workers on the subject peculiarly as it concerns MNOC in Nigeria. The work shall chiefly confer with books, diaries and articles amongst others.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

With the general growing of CSR in many transnational companies, it is barely surprising that CSR attracted considerable attending in recent old ages. In an effort to digest CSR, surveies have focused on the significance, drivers and range of CSR. While some research workers ‘ say it should non be, others said it should be philanthropic, some said it is to heighten concern, and others even think it regulative conformity. Much of the earlier work emphasized two outstanding definitions: philanthropic gift or concern sweetening. Ojala ( 1994 ) said it has three major aspects: following with the jurisprudence ; puting and staying by moral and ethical criterions ; and philanthropic giving.

The first popular/acceptable definition of CSR is by Bowen ( 1953, p.6 ) He defined CSR as “ the duties of business communities to prosecute those policies, to do those determinations, or to follow those lines of action which are desirable in footings of the aims and values of our society. ”

Since so, many definitions followed runing from Carroll ( 1979 ) , McWilliams and Siegel ( 2001 ) , Whetten et Al ( 2002 ) , Maignan and Ferrell ( 2004 ) and Sriramesh et Al. ( 2009 ) EU ‘s Green paper on CSR defined it as ‘a concept whereby companies integrate societal and environmental concerns in their concern operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary footing ‘ . The World Business Council for Sustainable Development defines CSR as

the go oning committedness by concern to act ethically and lend to economic development while bettering the quality of life of its workers. . .as good as the local community and society at big.

These definitions are of import to this work as they see CSR as voluntary.

To CSR advocators it is giving back to the land/people from whom it has taken so much, else poorness, unemployment, lop-sided development would go on to stalk Companies. Shankar Venkateswaran ( 2000 ) said that Islands of prosperity can non last in a sea of poorness – the sea will finally steep the islands.

On the reverse, critics believe that CSR are used to deflect public from inquiring inquiries posed by MNC operations. To them, CSR is non committed to sustainable development as claimed because activities of MNC ‘s are contrary CSR. Example is Shell ‘s CSR led to open uping in ternary bottom line coverage, still there was a dirt of its misreporting of oil militias in 2004.


Peoples view CSR otherwise, some advocate while others criticize. Peter Drucker ( 2004 ) is of the position that CSR should non be at all. He said ‘corporate societal duty is a unsafe deformation from concern rules. If you find an executive who wants to take on societal duty, fire him. Fast. ‘ Others said that the organisations pay revenue enhancements to guarantee that society and the environment are non adversely affected by concern activities. This leads us to the first research inquiry.

What could be the chief drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility by transnational companies? Is it to advance corporate image and benefit concern or do they have positive duties that add value to the communities they do concern in?

Motivations to prosecute in CSR are varies. Some are response to market forces, globalisation, consumer and civil society force per unit areas, etc. Some see it as a higher inducement to protect trade names and investings ( NEEDS ) .

CSR drivers will be reviewed in three classs: economic, institutional and societal drivers

Economic Drivers

There has been a batch of literature back uping that CSR is to heighten concern.

This proposition was clearly supported by Milton Friedman ( 1970 ) . To him, a corporation ‘s intent is to maximise returns to its stockholders and non to society as a whole. He said

When I hear business communities speak articulately about the “ societal duties of concern in a competitive system, ” I am reminded of the fantastic line about the Frenchman who discovered at the age of 70 that he had been talking prose all his life. The business communities believe that they are supporting free endeavor when they declaim that concern is non concerned “ simply ” with net income but besides with advancing desirable “ societal ” ends ; that concern has a “ societal scruples ” and takes earnestly its duties for supplying employment, extinguishing favoritism, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the mottos of the modern-day harvest of reformists.

In the same vena, McKibben Bill ( 2006 ) suggests that corporations which exist entirely to maximise net incomes are unable to progress the involvements of society as a whole. Besides, Lord Justices Pill, May and Keane ( 1997 ) in turn outing that McDonald ‘s concern contradicts its societal duty rules ruled that eating adequate McDonald ‘s nutrient may do 1s diet high in fat therefore addition the hazard bosom disease in McDonaldHYPERLINK “ hypertext transfer protocol: //’s_Restaurants_v_Morris_ & A ; _Steel ” ‘HYPERLINK “ hypertext transfer protocol: //’s_Restaurants_v_Morris_ & A ; _Steel ” s Restaurants V Steel HYPERLINK “ hypertext transfer protocol: //’s_Restaurants_v_Morris_ & A ; _Steel ” & amp ; HYPERLINK “ hypertext transfer protocol: //’s_Restaurants_v_Morris_ & A ; _Steel ” Morris. For Johnson ( 1971p.54 cited in Vrabic, 2010 ) ‘Social duty states that concern carry out societal plans to add net incomes to their organisations. ” He perceives CSR as long-term net income maximization non merely activity to show ethical criterions. Orlitzky, Schmidt, and Rynes ( 2004 ) in their survey found a correlativity between social/environmental public presentation and fiscal public presentation.

Kurucz ( 2008, p.86 ) , in his survey identified four general types of concern instances to back up that CSR enhances concern: cost and hazard decrease, net income maximization and competitory advantage, repute and legitimacy, and interactive value creative activity.

Cost and hazard Decrease:

Firm engage in CSR to cut down costs and hazards to the house, since stakeholder ‘s demands can show a possible menace to corporate fiscal ends ( Kurucz, 2008, p. 88 ) .

Competitive Advantage:

CSR can be used to derive competitory advantage over industry challengers ( Kurucz, 2008, p. 89 ) . It is besides used as a lobbying scheme for tighter ordinances that leads to higher market values particularly in oil companies with heavy polluting activities. ( Porter 1991, cited in Vrabic, 2010 )

Repute and Legitimacy:

CSR is made for strategic grounds and are designed to widen legitimacy and heighten corporate repute, to keep its legitimacy, fix or support its doomed or threatened legitimacy ( Kurucz, 2008, p. 91 ) . Miles and Covin ( 2000 cited in Vrabic, 2010 ) opined that environmental stewardship creates reputational advantage that enhances selling and fiscal public presentation. To Brown and Dacin ( 1997 ) , negative societal repute can hold damaging consequence on merchandise ratings and positive societal repute can heighten merchandise ratings. This could be seen from the boycott of Shell gas station by European consumers due to Shell ‘s effort to dispose Brent Spar oil platform in the Atlantic Ocean and the attendant 50 % diminution gross revenues ( Neuger, 1995 cited in Vrabic, 2010 ) .

Synergistic Value Creation

Approachs recommending interactive value creative activity are focused seeking chances to uncover, relate, and synthesise the involvements of diverse set of stakeholders.

Some surveies, nevertheless, have taken a different attack. Lerner and Fryxell, ( 1988 cited in Vrabic, 2010 ) ) argue that houses incur unneeded costs that does non add value and cut down profitableness by increasing societal public presentation.


Much as there may be economic drivers of CSR, to function long term national involvements, Governments have a strong involvement in advancing CSR enterprises largely through ordinance to complement their environmental and societal plans ( Mazurkiewicz, 2004a ) . Outstanding CSR research workers consider ordinance as a natural adjunct to bettering the societal public presentation of concern, contingent merely on the right design of market inducements ( Porter and van der Linde 2000, p. 156, cited in Vrabic, 2010 ) . In Europe, many states have introduced statute law to mandate environmental coverage for corporations ( Haigh and Jones, 2006 ) . Besides, Inter-governmental organisations like EU, UN and OECD promote CSR through assorted policies that encourage companies to voluntarily prosecute in more sustainable and socially responsible behavior of concern.

In the oil sector, ( Frynas, 2009, p.50 – 52 ) argue that determinations are going politicized particularly with joint venture understandings. With joint venture, Government owns portions, oil, grants licences, provides regulative model, and defines several rights and duties of investors.

Social Factors

Moon and Vogel, ( 2008, cited in Vrabic, 2010 ) argue that in the planetary market, MNCs frequently appeared to be every bit powerful as provinces, yet unexplainable as Governments and international establishments most times create regulative vacuity to command their actions. This vacuum the NGOs usually make full by oppugning MNCs actions ( Held and McGrew, 2002, cited in Vrabic, 2010 ) . NGOs demand that companies follow the conventions and understandings signed within UN, regard basic environmental ordinances adopted by western authoritiess or regional organisations ( Bandell, 2004 ) .

The 2nd inquiry is

Why are there proliferations of young person combativeness and motion, protests, invasion of oil installations and abduction of oil workers, intense difference and struggles against the MNOCs in the Niger Delta despite the CSR?

The jobs between the oil companies and host communities are best described by Watts, ( 2004:198 ) as the narrative of development and counter development “ working with and against one another in complex and contradictory ways. ” The crises and ill will harmonizing to Eweje ( 2007 ) arise sometimes because natives feel they do n’t acquire adequate societal and economic infrastructures/assistance from the MNOCs.

The CSR seem to intensify the crisis. This is because either by skip or committee, CSR activities and procedures impact negatively on local communities, frequently outweighing the positive benefits CSR brings ( Watts, 2004 ) . Christian Aid ( 2004 ) says that despite Shell ‘s claims about “ honestness, unity and regard for people ” , the oil company has failed to convey about alteration in the delta. It besides confirmed that some of the acclaimed schools, infirmaries and other societal comfortss have been abandoned or did non run into the demands of the communities they were meant to back up. It found grounds that Shell ‘s clean-up of oil spills and fix of grapevines in Nigeria is scandalously unequal and would ne’er be tolerated in Europe and North America. This failure of CSR added to the bad feeling between the local community and Shell ( Andrew Pendleton Christian assistance study ) .

Sometimes oil companies carry propaganda by manner of CSR. Example is the CSR that followed Ogoni crisis to deliver Shell ‘s image particularly with several publications and propogandas.58

Oil companies sometimes connive with the province to be violent, utilizing private security and province agents who are frequently hyperactive in their undertakings of protecting oil installings and workers. This leads to harassment, bullying and suppression of environmental development and rights activities. Sometimes crises arise because of oil spills. Nembe indigene 3 ( cited in Tuodolo 2007 ) said

Oil activities cause serious environmental job. Oil spills ; discharge of boring and production waste ; and gas flaringaˆ¦ . The negative impact of these on the people ‘s wellness and support is tremendous: All of us in this community are fishermen aˆ¦ there is ever spillage aˆ¦ have destroyed our marine life and our occupationaˆ¦ .

To demo Shell ‘s carelessness and non-sustainability, it spilled 14,000 dozenss of oil into the Niger Delta in 2009 while that of 2008 is between 2,200-8,000 and a day-to-day flaring of about 604 million per twenty-four hours ( SPDC, 2009 ) .

On their portion, Shell CEO Peter Voser ( 2010, reported in Guardian newspapers ) said that

Nigeria, particularly the Niger Delta, remains a really ambitious topographic point in which to run. Security issues and sabotage are changeless menaces to our people, assets and the environment… .

Even when the crises originate, oil companies respond when and how they like. They sometimes pay compensation and originate community undertakings, but do non heighten their societal duty certificates ( Omotala 2010 ) . He said

One, the oil companies aˆ¦ are known for paying compensations that are far lower than international minimal criterions. They are besides reputed for the turning away of payments of compensation on frivolous evidences such as imputing oil spills to undermine for which they may non be blameworthy. In some cases, they merely pay compensation after drawn-out tribunal instances that are normally really dearly-won to the host community.

Sometimes the development does non worth it even when they are implemented. Idemudia ( 2009 ) said CSR developments must protect, preserve and conserve the environments upon which the support of rural dwellers depends to be meaningful and sustainable. MNOC ‘s are being accused of life by their words. Example, a community leader asserts that ”most of these developments are merely reflected on their books, non on the land and even so it is non based on the precedences set by the communities but what suits their public relation image of the company ” ( Eweje, 2007 ) .

All this culminated together causes the lifting force, combativeness, protests, invasion of oil installations, grapevine vandalization and abduction of oil workers in the part which sometimes swings both the oil companies and Government to actions.

Eweje ( 2007 ) concludes that no affair how commendable the CSR enterprises are – if the host communities do non experience that the undertakings will make a sustainable economic, societal and environmental development the struggle and agitation in the Niger Delta will go on.

There have been inquiries of whether CSR differ in developing and developed states. Amaeshi et Al. ( 2006 ) in their work asked if there is a Nigerian trade name of CSR or is it an imitation of western CSR patterns.

NEEDS XV argue that socio-culturally framed and that the socio-cultural features of Nigeria are alone and as such, the pattern of CSR would chiefly be shaped by the socio-economic conditions in which these houses operate. To NEEDS, CSR in Nigeria would be aimed towards poorness relief, wellness attention proviso, substructure development, instruction, etc, non needfully contemplation of popular western criterion like consumer protection, just trade, green selling, clime alteration, societal responsible investings, etc.

Oil spills are more in Nigeria and even where there is, prompt actions are non taken ( Christian Aid 2004 ) . Sing this point, Frynas, ( 2005 ) said that where authorities fails to efficaciously do and implement environmental ordinance, MNOC merely voluntarily care to avoid oil spills and may be label it ‘CSR ‘ . CSR today looks more of regulative conformity in developed states with more effectual authorities.

In Nigeria, Shell admitted that its attack to CSR causes community upset ( SPDC, 2005:28 ) , yet Shell has non changed the patterns despites its claims to CSR.

While the more popular sentiment like ( Frynas, Christian Aid ) is that there is dual criterion, sometimes MNOCs act the same manner in both development and developed states. This can be justified by subscribing of collaborative understandings with Colombian with the Colombian Defence Ministry to supply $ 2.2 million on top of the compulsory war revenue enhancement in 1995 by BP ( Muttitt and Marriott, 2002 ) . BP was accused of organizing its ain ground forces and engaging security people with histories of human rights maltreatments and even slaying ( Beder, 2002, cited in Vrabic, 2010 ) . Probes revealed that BP ‘s security house, trained the Colombian constabulary in pacification and intelligence techniques used against local communities, and besides provided arms to the 16th Battalion of the Colombian ground forces, which so conducted a slaughter ( Gillard, 1999 cited in Vrabic, 2010 ) . There was ferocious stakeholder force per unit area on BP and BP evaluated its societal and environmental schemes ( Frynas, 2009, p. 22-23 ) . Some old ages after, a senior BP director admitted:

We ‘ve learned from our mistakesaˆ¦ . In Colombia we were accused of acquiring excessively near to the ground forces and constabulary in order to protect our operations. We listened, approached the Human Rights Watch for advice, and so organized new security agreements ( Rice, 2002, p. 135 ) .

Could it be safe to state CSR in developing states are non at its best and if so is overlap, uneffective coordination and communicating, absence of regulative model, partnership with Government/local communities ‘ major jobs impeding the effectual execution of CSR undertakings?

In Nigeria, Rauscher ( 1992, cited in Frynas 1998 ) says that Governments sought to pull foreign investors by allowing ecological dumping, for the interest of economic development. Ite ( 2004 ) besides argued that the authorities has continued to rebel on its committedness that it becomes about impossible for the CSR investings by the oil houses to lend positively to their host communities.

Oil companies blame oil pollution on political instability like sabotage because there is no comprehensive statute law on compensation payments to communities in Nigeria ( Frynas 1998 ) . But Walter and Ugelow ( 1979 ) in their work said that Nigeria ‘s environmental policy is been tolerant to corporate defilers for a long clip comparison to international criterion.

Frynas argues that there is a direct relationship between province public assistance proviso and the demand for CSR enterprises. To him, greater societal and environmental duties should be taken in states where the authorities does non hold effectual mechanisms of ordinance and proviso of public goods. He cited Nigeria as his illustration.

Patricia Werhane ( 2007 ) on her ain portion cited corruptness as a serious job impeding CSR execution in developing states. She said

A large challenge confronting transnational corporations is how they should react to local corruptness. Both Shell Oil and Exxon/Mobile sought to transport out boring operations at sites plagued by corrupt local and national governmentsaˆ¦ . ( Patricia Werhane 2007 )

This is besides Watts position when he said ‘What passes as development is normally contracts and bribes-so-called hard currency payments-with influential traditional elites, orchestrated through uneffective or corrupt community liason officers ‘ ( Watts, 2004 ) .

CSR uneffective coordination manifests in commercialised struggles between persons and groups who ever fight over the benefits ; community financess for development are mismanaged, misappropriated, and embezzled or shared by community leaders or coterie ( Watts, 2004 ) . Social upsets like weaponries ownership, increasing illiteracy, criminalism, anarchy and the decomposition of tradition and civilization now became order of the twenty-four hours.

CSR should be considered more as a corporate moral duty, and limit the range of CSR by concentrating more on direct impacts of the organisation ( Patricia Werhane 2007 ) .

It is suggested that for CSR to worth its onion, there should be better governmental and international ordinance and enforcement, instead than voluntary steps. This is EU attack. For illustration, Denmark on 16 December 2008, adopted a measure doing it compulsory for the 1100 largest Danish companies, investors and state-owned companies to include information on CSR in their one-year fiscal studies. In Nigeria, FEC approved CSR policy on 21st May 2008. Besides, Akwa Ibom province enacted oil and gas jurisprudence qualifying societal duty of oil companies.

To Christian Aid ( 2004:2 ) the lone manner to transfuse honestness and unity into concern pattern is to deprive CSR of its voluntarism and ordain Torahs that spell out minimal societal and environmental criterions that companies must run into. Jettison corporate societal duty: do it corporate societal answerability, because for excessively long CSR has served as ‘merely a subdivision of PR ‘ and in some instances as the ‘only jets of development activity by big companies. ‘


This work had defined CSR and explored the cardinal drivers of CSR. The observation is that today CSR is a effect of assorted factors together interactions of assorted societal groups and NGOs, province establishments and self advancing economic motivations.

Three chief drivers were seen as the chief boosters of CSR, and one could reason that CSR is more of concern scheme than societal. In the Niger Delta the continued crises could be attributed to the fact that MNOS ‘s do their things in their ain manner without really touching indigenes lives. They employ any agencies to protect their concern involvement As respects the criterion, MNOC follow different criterion for different shot that is why this work is of the position that there should be Torahs steering CSR non merely MNOC ‘s making what they think is suited to them. This work besides found out that there are structural factors, systemic failures, absence of enabling environment hinder positive impact of CSR. Although the popular position from this reappraisal is that MNOCs prosecute in CSR to heighten concern therefore there should be CSR ordinances, it can non be ruled out that ordinances particularly rigorous 1s and host communities jobs will deter the MNOC who may make up one’s mind to travel their investing to a more friendly concern environment. This clearly gives room for more research.


I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out