Classical economic experts viewed competition as the mechanism through which economic phenomena become independent of “ people ‘s will ” and give rise to regularities that are conformable to abstract theorisation ( e.g. , J.S. Mill, 1848, p.147 ) . In this attack, competition is regarded as a procedure of competition among houses in their ceaseless battle for endurance which is associated with houses ‘ uninterrupted attempts to introduce and cut down the cost of production in order to spread out their market portion at the disbursal of their challengers. By the mid-1870s, this dynamic impression of competition was bit by bit replaced by the neoclassical inactive impression of competition in which the figure of houses in the market is the decisive characteristic of the grade of competition. The fewer the figure of houses the lower the grade of competition and, therefore, the higher the profitableness of the houses consisting the industry.
The intent of this paper is to prove the cardinal dogmas of these two alternate theories utilizing informations from the Greek fabrication industries. The balance of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 high spots the most of import characteristics of the alternate constructs of competition. Section 3 investigates the extent to which the grade of concentration in Greece changed over clip and besides subjects to empirical proving the hypothesis whether or non net incomes are straight related to the grade of concentration. Section 4 discusses the extent to which there is a long-term equalisation of net income rates. Finally, Section 5 concludes and makes some comments about the way of future research attempts.
- Inactive and Dynamic Conceptions of Competition:
- Concentration and Profitability in Grecian Fabrication:
- Equalization of Net income Ratess:
The inactive impression of competition is chiefly associated with neoclassical economic sciences, which is taught in the standard microeconomic theory. Harmonizing to this attack, competition is viewed as a province of equilibrium, where absolutely informed agents bring forthing a merchandise precisely like their “ challengers ” operate in a market with no entry or issue barriers. In such an environment, each agent in and of itself can non impact the market result and merely reacts to parametrically given monetary values. The figure of participants in an industry defines the grade of competition and when the figure of houses is sufficiently big one expects a unvarying profitableness within and across industries. By contrast, as the figure of participants dwindles, phenomena such as oligopolistic or monopolistic behavior arise which lead to differential profitableness between houses within the industry but besides between industries. One of the cardinal propositions in standard microeconomic theory is that the being of net incomes over and above the norm is attributed to market imperfectnesss and to the grade of monopoly of houses. In such non-competitive equilibrium, some monetary values remain higher than their fringy cost and society underutilizes its resources.
Within the neoclassical attack to competition there are two major lines of research. The first, the “ imperfectionist ” , is associated with people from Harvard University like Bain and J.K. Galbraith, who argue that existent competition deviates from perfect competition, something that makes the authorities ‘s disciplinary function of markets ‘ imperfectnesss imperative. The antitrust statute law that has been instituted in the USA and has been adopted, to a great extent, in European states is rooted into this “ imperfectionist ” attack. The 2nd line of research, the “ perfectionist ” , is associated with the University of Chicago and its chief representatives are Stigler and Harberger who claim that the differentiation between perfect and imperfect competition is theoretically perfectly valid ; however, the empirical grounds shows that the existent divergences are minimum and for practical intents can be ignored. Consequently, authorities intercession can non truly accomplish state of affairss much different from those that arise spontaneously from the free operation of the market.
The dynamic impression of competition is found in the Hagiographas of classical economic experts, Adam Smith ( 1776 ) , David Ricardo ( 1817 ) and John Stuart Mill ( 1848 ) , who theorized competition as a procedure characterized by the free mobility of capital and labor, which taken in the long-term leads to the equalisation of net income rates across industries. [ 2 ] For classical economic experts, the mechanism chiefly responsible for the riddance of inter-industry net income rate derived functions is the influx or escape of capital and non needfully the entry or issue of houses. Capital flows in and out of industries in its relentless attempt to take advantage of net income chances. This procedure of capital flows by no agency implies that overtime there is equality of net income rates between industries, but that the equalisation is merely tendential and the equality is established on an norm and after the transition of long clip. At any minute in clip one can merely detect differences, little or big, between an industry ‘s net income rate and the economic system ‘s mean.
Figuratively talking although both constructs of competition would reason for the equalisation of net income rates between industries, the neoclassical one would gestate such an equalisation to take topographic point in a short period of clip, whereby an industry ‘s net income rate initial differences ( positive or negative ) from the norm will decease out and accordingly one could shortly anticipate the convergence of this industry ‘s net income rate to the economic system ‘s mean. By contrast, in the classical construct of competition there is no convergence, but relentless fluctuations of industries ‘ net income rates around the economic system ‘s mean ; hence, the net income rate of any peculiar industry will be different from the norm ; nevertheless, over a long period of clip these divergences cancel each other out and their amount is expected to be non different from nothing.
Industrial organisation surveies for the Grecian economic system, in general, and for its fabrication sector, in peculiar, are rare ; those few surveies normally measure concentration ratios at the 2-digit industry collection degree ( Droucopoulos, 1991 ; Tsaliki and Tsoulfidis, 1998 and Kaskarelis and Tsoulfidis, 1999 ) In the present survey, we employ informations at the 3-digit industry item supplying a categorization of 91 industries from three back-to-back fabrication nose counts ( old ages 1978, 1984 and 1988 ) . The concentration ratios of the industries refer to the employment base, whereas our placeholder for profitableness is the portion of gross net incomes to entire gross revenues of large-scale industry.
The arrested developments between the so-estimated net income borders on gross revenues ( PMS ) against the concentration ratio of the top four houses in the industry ( CR ) did non expose a statistically important relationship. In fact, the coefficient of finding was found to be identical from zero and the coefficient of the independent variable non statistically important. The simple arrested developments with the Herfindahl Index ( -I ) as an index for concentration ratio provided similar consequences with that of the CR for the two old ages of our analysis. Similarly, in non-linear arrested developments the consequences are negative for the neoclassical theory of competition. [ 5 ] Hence, the correlativity of profitableness with the grade of concentration is excessively weak and does non impart support to the position that the concentrated industries needfully expose higher profitableness as a consequence of their monopoly power. In Figure 1, we plot the net income borders on gross revenues against the CR and the HI for the old ages 1984 and 1988.
An review of the reveals that in the period between the old ages 1984 and 1988 at that place has non been any cardinal alteration in the construction of the Grecian fabrication. Furthermore, the concentration index of the top four houses for the three old ages does non uncover any important alteration, as this can be judged. The consequences are similar for the HI.
Note: Number of observations is 91.
The lower trigon presents the Pearson correlativity coefficients of the variables at manus along with their statistical significance as this can be judged by their chance values shown in parenthesis, for the old ages 1984 and 1988. The upper trigon of Table 2 shows estimations of the Spearman ‘s rank correlativity coefficients, whose advantage over the Pearson ‘s correlativity coefficients is that they account for possible nonlinear dealingss. The chances shown in the parentheses indicate statistically undistinguished correlativities between net income border on gross revenues and concentration ratios, with the exclusion of the Spearman ‘s rank correlativity coefficient between the variables PMS88 and HI88 and between PMS88 and CR88 which are statistically marginally important at the 5 % and the 10 % degree of significance ( p-values: 0.05 and 0.07, severally ) .
The consequences of the twelvemonth 1984 are decidedly negative for the hypothesis that the figure of participants in an industry affects the profitableness, whereas the consequences for 1988 lend some support to the neoclassical hypothesis. In order to deduce more conclusive consequences we tested two extra econometric specifications. In the first specification we formed a two-period panel provided that the industries are the same in the two nose count old ages ( 1984 and 1988 ) . The arrested development consequences of PMS against CR and the HI using the heteroscedasticity robust White ‘s gauging method with the t-statistics in parentheses:
Clearly, the statistical grounds does non impart support to the neoclassical hypothesis, the t- statistics in parenthesis are of low values and the R2 is close nothing.
In the 2nd econometric specification we took the first difference of the variables at manus. More specifically, we run arrested developments of the differences of ?PMS =PMS88-PMS84 against ?CR=CR88-CR84 and ?HI=HI88-HI84. The consequences of the arrested developments rectifying for the possible presence of heteroscedasticity utilizing White ‘s method with the t-statistics in parentheses:
There is no uncertainty that the consequences of this specification are flatly against the hypothesis of a positive relationship between profitableness measured by PMS and the grade of concentration measured either by CR or the HI.
The empirical analysis so far has been inactive, since we examined to what extent net income borders on gross revenues are positively correlated with the concentration indexes. The consequences overall show that there is no statistically important relation. The following measure is to prove the long tally tendential equalisation of net income rates in Greek fabrication industries. For this intent, and besides due to the deficiency of informations for 3-digit industries, we restrict ourselves to 2-digit industries of the Grecian fabrication.
The hypothesis of equalisation of net income rates has been tested so far in footings of the mean profitableness of each industry against the economic system ‘s mean. However, it has been repeatedly pointed out, that the rate of net income on regulation capitals is the relevant variable to the hypothesis of the tendential interindustry equalisation of net income rates between industries ( e.g. Botwinik, 1993, p. 154 ) . In this sense, an industry ‘s mean profitableness that has been used in a figure of surveies is non needfully the appropriate index of profitableness that attracts the investing flows. The thought is that the mean rate of net income estimates the profitableness of all the houses consisting the industry ; houses that use advanced engineering and have excellent location and houses whose engineering is old and disused. However, the majority of investing flows is non directed neither to the old type of capitals because of low profitableness nor to the really new capitals because they are normally associated with excessively much hazard and use new, non tested and non easy consistent engineerings ( because of patents, better location, etc ) .
Turning to fabrication, the modulating conditions of each industry may non needfully co-occur with the mean conditions but are instead determined by the type of capital where enlargement or contraction of accretion takes topographic point. This construct is similar to what concern people call the capital, which embodies “ the best by and large available method of production ” , and is frequently called “ the best-practice method of production ” . This should non take to the decision that all houses adopt this method of production instantly, since houses operate fixed capitals of different vintages and directors have different outlooks about the way of demand and profitableness. Consequently, houses do non easy exchange from one method of production to another. However, new capitals are expected to come in into that method of production, which can be easy duplicated and, moreover, the expected rate of net income is attractive plenty. The production method which is targeted by the new entrants is normally the most recent in the industry and non the older or the most profitable. The older methods of production, ceteris paribus, will hold a rate of net income lower than the industry ‘s mean, whereas the most profitable methods of production may non be easy consistent or their reproduction might be associated with high hazard, which new entrants normally do non wish to set about.
Harmonizing to classical economic experts, merely over a long period of clip there is a inclination for the rate of net income to equalise of modulating capitals between industries. The net income rates of the regulation capitals across industries are those that are expected to be equalized. The rate of net income earned on modulating capital is, hence, the step of return on new investing and determines the beat of capital accretion in industries. If two modulating capitals have different rates of net income, the investing will flux differentially and will non merely halt fluxing in the industry with the lower rate of net income because of uncertainness and differences in outlooks. Consequently, at any given minute in clip, the rates of net income between modulating capitals across industries are non equal and merely in the long tally there is a tendential equalisation of the modulating rates of net income to an norm.
The job with the construct of modulating capital is its quantification in existent economic systems. In rule, one can separate these conditions by detecting an industry over clip and roll uping informations for a group of houses with certain features that persist over clip. Stigler ‘s “ subsister technique ” might be an illustration that would steer such a research for the designation of the modulating capital of an industry each twelvemonth crossing a sufficiently long period of clip. Clearly, such a process requires informations which are difficult to come by for a few industries and a few old ages, and such attempts would be highly hard to transport out for a long tally analysis and many industries. One manner out is Shaikh ‘s ( 1995 ) thought harmonizing to which although we may non cognize the regulating capital of each industry, nevertheless, we can gauge the profitableness of these capitals through the construct of “ incremental rate of return on capital ” ( henceforth IROR ) . [ 9 ] His principle is as follows: investing flows are conditioned more by the short-term rate of return which is expressed in the construct of IROR than by the rate of net income over the life-time of the investing. Hence, he distinguishes between current net incomes ( ?t ) that accrue to a house as the amount of net incomes from the most recent investing ( ?It-1 ) and net incomes that accrue to a house from all old investings ( ?* ) which is tantamount to stating, the current net incomes in the absence of new investing. Consequently, we write:
?t = ?It-1 + ?*
By subracting net incomes of the past periods from both sides of the above equation we get:
?t – ?t-1= ?? t-1 + ( ?* – ? t-1 ) or ?? T = ?? t-1 + ( ?* – ?t-1 ) .
The term in parenthesis is expected to be little, much smaller comparatively to the term ??t-1 and, hence, for all practical intents it can be ignored. The justification is the position that the shorter the rating skyline, the closer the current net income will be on carried-over vintages ?* to the last period ‘s net income on the same capital goods ( ?t-1 ) . Furthermore, since uncertainness and ignorance addition with the transition of clip, it is sensible to presume that the short-run ( up to a twelvemonth ) is the relevant clip skyline. After all, current net incomes are fraught with many passing factors, and we know that abnormally high or low net incomes direct investing consequently, which in bend gives rise to new uncertainness and therefore net incomes or losingss, and so forth. With these considerations in head it is sensible to presume that outlooks about future returns to investing are nearsighted, that is, outlooks depend on the short tally rate of return. Consequently, the current rate of return on new investing will be:
? T = ?? t / I t-1
that is, the alteration in net incomes of each industry divided by the investing in the old period. The above constellation provides a practical manner to place the profitableness in the instance that we do non hold informations on the best pattern technique and the group of houses that utilize it over the old ages. Consequently, the gesture of the IROR determines whether or non there is a tendential equalisation of net income rates for the regulation capitals. Below, we propose a simple trial harmonizing to which we estimate whether or non the divergence of industry ‘s IROR from the mean differs from nothing over the long tally. The consequences are displayed in Table 3. In add-on, in Figure 2, we plot the IROR divergences from the norm in Grecian fabrication industries data over clip. The information span the period between 1962 and 1993.
Clearly, the consequences in Table 3 reject the hypothesis of lasting divergences of industries ‘ IRORs from nothing with merely the exclusion of industry 24. An review of the informations of industry 24 in Figure 2 revealed that the rejection of the void hypothesis is due chiefly to some obvious outliers, that is to state, the exceptionally high IRORs in early 1960s, which when subtracted from the sample gave the expected consequence.
Note: H0: sample mean = 0 and H1: sample mean ? 0.
Similar consequences are obtained from the following autoregressive strategy, which has been repeatedly used in the literature:
xit = ai + bxit-1+uit
Where xit the incremental rate of returns divergences of industry I from the economic system broad norm of industries at clip T, Army Intelligence is the changeless term of industry I and bi the incline coefficient, while uit is an iid perturbation term. In the long tally, if there is tendential equalisation of the net income rate so it must be true that that the |bi| & lt ; 1 and ai=0. In such a instance:
Since, the stochastic term uit is distributed with average nothing and changeless discrepancy, it follows that the clip series of divergences approaches the bound ai/ ( 1-bi ) , which is the jutting long-term rate of return of each industry. It follows that for this term the void hypothesis of being statistically different than nothing must be rejected, if the hypothesis of the tendential equalisation of the interindustry net income rates is to be accepted. In the usual empirical surveies ( Glick, 1985, Mueller, 1986 and 1990 ) it is claimed that if Army Intelligence is zero and the absolute value of Bi is less than one, so the projected returns ai/ ( 1-bi ) will be equal to nothing. A closer scrutiny of the issue, nevertheless, reveals that since both the numerator and denominator of the fraction ai/ ( 1-bi ) are estimated parametric quantities, it follows that the standard mistake of the above term should be estimated from the matrix of estimated covariances of the coefficients ( Kmenta, 1991, pp. 485-491 and Green, 1990, pp. 230-234 ) . More specifically, the estimated discrepancy of the projected returns will be:
In the arrested developments that we run, we tried autoregressive strategies of assorted slowdowns, nevertheless, for grounds of lucidity of presentation we restricted to the first order autoregressive strategy, provided that higher order autoregressive strategies, in the few instances that were statistically important did non alter the consequences qualitatively. The consequences of the econometric analysis are displayed in Table 2 below:
We observe that about in all instances the changeless term of the arrested developments is non statistically important, so we can non reject the void hypothesis that it is zero. Similar consequences we obtain with regard to the incline coefficients which are either zero or less than one in absolute value. A consequence which is consistent with the Marxian theory of competition provided that the term for the projected returns are non statistically important. There were two exclusions: the first refers to industry 21, for which the nothing hypothesis is accepted at the 7 % significance degree, whereas industry 24 clearly there is a gravitative form at an IROR much higher than the norm. An review of graphs of these two industries reveals that the consequences are due to two outliers one for each industry, which when we rerun the arrested developments taking these two observations we got the expected consequences.
In this article we set out to demo that the impression of competition as a dynamic procedure that has been developed by classical economic experts, Marx and besides Austrian economic experts ( Schmpeter, 1942, Kirztner, 1987 ) is much richer than it is normally thought. In our position, this alternate impression of competition concentrates a figure of interesting features that can go the foundation for the development of a more realistic theory of competition. Crucial to this attack is the impression of modulating capital whose general description can be found in Ricardo but its elaborate development is in Marx. To our position what is even more indispensable about the impression of modulating capital is its of import analogues with the established prudent concern patterns, whereby the “ best pattern capital or technique ” and its profitableness correspond to the regulation capital whose profitableness is estimated by the IROR.
The empirical analysis showed that there is no statistically sound positive relationship between the concentration ratio and profitableness in Greek fabrication industries, thereby projecting uncertainty to the major proposition of the inactive impression of competition. Furthermore, the clip series statistical analysis showed that the IROR of each of the 20 industries of the Grecian fabrication displayed gravitative behavior around the economic system ‘s mean IROR, which is tantamount to stating that there is a tendential equalisation of net income rates for the regulation capitals. A consequence which is consistent with the dynamic analysis of competition and encourages us to believe that the analysis of competition as a procedure and the associated with it construct of modulating capital constitute a fertile land for farther theoretical and empirical research.
Botwinik, H. 1994. Persistent Inequalities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Clifton, J. 1977. “ Competition and the Evolution of the Capitalist Mode of Production. ”
Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1, 137-51.
Droucopoulos, V. ( 1991 ) The Degree of Concentration in Greek Manufacturing ( in Greek ) . Issues in Political Economy 8, 99-121.
Droucopoulos, V. and Lianos, T. ( 1993 ) The Continuity of Net incomes in the Grecian Manufacturing, 1963-1988. International Review of Applied Economics, 7, 163-176.
Droucopoulos, V. and Papadogonas, Th. ( 2000 ) Concentration Indexs: Back to the Drawing Board, Ekonomia 4, 55-72.
Glick, M. 1985. “ Monopoly or Competition in the US Economy. ” Review of Radical Political.
Economicss, 17, 121-7.
Green, W. 1990. Econometric Analysis. London: MacMillan.
Kaskarelis, I. and Tsoulfidis, L. ( 1999 ) Inflation, Demand, Imports Competition and Markups in Greek Manufacturing Industries, Economia Internazionale, pp. 151-171.
Kirzner, I. 1987. “ Competition: Austrian constructs ” in Eatwell, J. , Milgate, M. and Newman, P. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: Macmillan.
Kmenta, J. 1991. Elementss of Econometricss. New York: Macmilan.
Marx, K. 1847. Engage Labour and Capital. Moscow: International Publishers, 1976.
Marx, K. 1867. Capital Vol. I, New York: International Publisher, 1977.
Marx, K. 1894. Capital Vol. III, New York: International Publisher, 1977.
Mill, J.S. ( 1848 ) Principles of Political Economy. Fairfield New Jersey: Augustus M. Kelley, 1976.
Mueller, D. erectile dysfunction. ( 1990 ) The Dynamicss of Company Profits, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ricardo, D. ( 1951, [ 1821 ] ) Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
Shaikh, A. 1980. “ Marxian Competition versus Perfect Competition: Further Remarks on the Alleged Choice of Technique. ” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 4, 1980.
Shaikh, A. ( 1995 ) The Stock Market and the Corporate Sector: A Net income Based Approach. Working Paper, No 146. New York: Jerome Levy Institute.
Smith, A. ( 1776 ) The Wealth of Nations, New York: The Modern Library, 1976.
Shaikh, A. 1995. “ The Stock Market and the Corporate Sector: A Net income Based Approach. ” Working Paper, No 146. New York: Jerome Levy Institute.
Smith, A. 1776, The Wealth of Nations, New York: The Modern Library, 1976.
Tsaliki, P. and Tsoulfidis, L. ( 1998 ) Alternative Theories of Competition: Evidence from Grecian Manufacturing, International Review of Applied Economics 12, 187-204.
Tsoulfidis, L. and Tsaliki, P. ( 2005 ) Marxian Theory of Competition and the Concept of Regulating Capital, Review of Radical Political Economy 37: 5-22.
- It is interesting to observe that the promarket decisions of this attack are reached utilizing clip series informations crossing over a long period of clip. However, such an attack is in divergence to the neoclassical construct of competition, which is in kernel inactive and it is oriented to the survey of market signifiers and non to alterations over clip.
- The classical impression of competition as a procedure of competition between houses can besides be found in the plants of Joseph Schumpeter ( 1942 ) and the modern Austrian economic experts ( Kirzner, 1987 ) . In both attacks, the enterpriser is a polar figure, who assumes the hazard and uncertainness that are inherently built into the system in which persons grope toward equilibrium.
- We measure the employment of the top four houses of each of the 91 large-scale industries, that is, the houses that operate in these industries employ at least 10 workers, as a per centum of the entire employment in the industry.
- Datas on net incomes and gross revenues for the twelvemonth 1978 are non available ; therefore our analysis is basically restricted to the old ages 1984 and 1988. However, we mention the concentration index of the twelvemonth 1978 to demo that the alterations in the grade of concentration are slow.
- As mentioned, we can non prove the hypothesis of the grade of concentration ( CR or HI ) against profitableness for the twelvemonth 1978 because of the deficiency of published informations on gross revenues and net incomes.
- Unfortunately, there are no more recent fabrication nose counts and so we can non analyze alterations in the recent old ages. However, to the extent that we know the literature Droucopoulos and Papadogonas ( 2000 ) analyzing unpublished informations of the twelvemonth 1992 besides find that the concentration indexes reasonably much remain the same over the old ages.
- See Muller ( 1990 ) for a figure of surveies about different states and Lianos and Droucopoulos ( 1993 ) for the Grecian economic system. These surveies normally find that the divergences of net income rates from the mean persist, a consequence that leads to the thought of the presence of monopolistic elements.
- Classical economic experts seem that they were cognizant of these restrictions in the flows of capital. The best illustration is the instance in agribusiness, where the most fertile lands are already cultivated and they are non available to new entrants who can merely come in into a worse type of land that secures the normal rate of net income and in this sense is the “ best ” available. Ricardo ( 1817, p. 73 ) analyzed the inside informations of this construct in agribusiness and excavation and made some attempts for generalisation.
- In fact, the construct of IROR is used in the literature of corporate finance to measure the profitableness of houses and forms one of the “ basicss ” that investors must see in their determinations.
- The clip period was defined by the handiness of informations on investing which start in the twelvemonth 1961, while after the twelvemonth 1993 the industry categorizations changed to such an extent that discourage any thought to spread out the information base to more recent old ages.