Canterbury Tales ( Analysis of the monk) Essay Sample

Likhita Kalla
One might specify a monastic as a member of a spiritual community of work forces who typically live under vows of poorness. celibacy. and obeisance. However. Geoffrey Chaucer. writer of the unfinished chef-d’oeuvre named Canterbury Tales. portrays a monastic whose attitude. visual aspect and lifestyle contrasts greatly with the features of a typical monastic. Chaucer accomplishes this portraiture of a eccentric monastic by integrating the usage of sarcasm and sarcasm in assorted ways throughout his narrative. But first. in order to wholly understand the sarcasm in this narrative. one has to understand all the curious features of this peculiar monastic. To get down with. this monastic is really mercenary. and he treasures personal enjoyment over following “the Rule of good St. Benet or St. Maur” ( 177 ) . For illustration. this monk’s garb is really modern and consists of an luxuriant robe with “sleeves that were garnished at the manus / With all right grey pelt. the finest in the land. / And on his goon. to fix it at his mentum / . . . A wrought-gold cunningly fashioned / pin ; / Into a lover’s knot it seemed to go through. / . . . Supple his boots ( 197-209 ) . This is an illustration of sarcasm because one would presume that a monk’s garb would dwell of a simple robe but this monastic treasures luxuriant vesture over simpleness unlike most monastics.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!

order now

In add-on to that. the monastic engages in activities that typical monastics would non hold engaged in during those times. For case. the monastic has an unusual involvement in runing wild coneies even though it is typically an upper category activity ( monastics are viewed as being lower category ) . “It was all his merriment. he spared for no expense” ( 196 ) . He has Equus caballuss. greyhounds and everything else needed for runing even though he knows that runing is considered a wickedness for monastics. All these illustrations tells us that monastic is really mercenary and that “He let travel by the things of yesterday / And took the modern world’s more broad / way” ( 179-181 ) . When it comes his facial and physical characteristics. we learn that he is a “fat and personable priest” ( 204 ) who has a barefaced caput that “shines like looking glass” ( 201 ) and he besides has “prominent orbs that ne’er seemed to settle” ( 205 ) . The monk’s physical visual aspect is really unusual because one would anticipate a monastic to be thin due to all his difficult work and simple repasts. In the medieval times. many drew decisions about someone’s character from their physical visual aspect. For case. outstanding eyes like those of this monastic and fleshiness might mean a lecherousness for nutrient and adult females. Another illustration of sarcasm occurs when the monastic says that he does non care about the regulations laid down by St. Benedict and “that a monastic uncloistered is a mere / Fish out of the H2O. rolling on the pier” ( 183-184 ) .

Surprisingly. the storyteller agrees with the monastic by stating that the monastics need non concentrate over books and engage in manual labour like St. Augustine advised. This is dry because monastics are expected to analyze. work difficult and unrecorded life merely. Furthermore. sarcasm is shown when Chaucer describes the monastic as being a “manly adult male. to be an Abbot able” ( 171 ) hinting that the monastic took his hunting and other “manly” activities really earnestly doing a good campaigner as the manager of a monastery. The overall sarcasm of the monastic is the turning deficiency of cherished conventional values in people that were known to stand for those values in a certain society. The Monk’s selfishness and desire for diversion gives him the realistic characteristic of the altering society during those times.


I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out