Analysing the Imperial Tobacco Groups Financial Performance

The intent of this study is to analyse Imperial Tobacco Group ‘s fiscal public presentation, over the past two old ages, through the survey of its one-year study of 2009. In add-on, the study will include relevant external information about the company which supplements the analysis.

Hire a custom writer who has experience.
It's time for you to submit amazing papers!


order now

The study will besides analyze the concern ‘s hard currency motions for the said period, after which it will travel on to set up the short and long term place that the group has acquired in the market.

Finally, this study will foreground the attraction of an investing in the equity portions of the group.

The ground for taking this company is its geographical spread and its diverse operations in fabrication, logistics and distribution. Besides, since Imperial Tobacco is the universe leader in its sector it gives the chance to analyze and analyse the best public presentation patterns followed in the industry.

Introduction to Imperial Tobacco Group PLC

Imperial Tobacco is one of the taking international baccy companies which industries, distributes and sells a broad scope of coffin nails, baccy, cigars, turn overing documents and tubings in over 160 states worldwide. The group besides offers logistics and distribution services for baccy and other merchandises.

“ It is the universe ‘s 4th largest coffin nail company by market portion ( after Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco and Japan Tobacco ) , and the universe ‘s largest manufacturer of cigars, fine-cut baccy and baccy documents. ” ( Corporate Fact File, Imperial Tobacco Group plc. )

The Group operates 51 fabrication sites worldwide and has about 38,000 employees. It has a successful path record of incorporating its acquisitions and quickly bring forthing grosss. Since 1997, the group has spent around ?17 billion on acquisitions, including large trade names like Davidoff, Gauloises Blondes, Altadis and Rizla.

Beginning: Annual Report 2009

Fiscal Performance Evaluation: Profitableness

The costs of gross revenues and responsibilities have increased from ?16,665 million in 2008 to ?21,201 million in 2009. Besides the gross has increased from ?20,528 million in 2008 to ?26,517 million in 2009, and this growing in gross reflects a full twelvemonth ‘s part from the acquisition of Altadis cigar concern, operational net incomes and foreign exchange benefits ( Annual Report 2009, Imperial Tobacco Group plc. ) . Though the costs of gross revenues for the company have increased over the twelvemonth, the gross generated shows a greater rise and therefore the company boasts of a 1.5 % growing in the gross net income border.

The rise in the investing income has been about half the addition in the finance costs thereby ensuing in the addition in the net finance costs from ?850 million in 2008 to ?1,392 million in 2009. This can chiefly be attributed to ‘Fair value losingss on derivative fiscal instruments supplying commercial hedges ‘ which rose from ?376 million to ?1,250 million over the twelvemonth ( Annual Report 2009, Imperial Tobacco Group plc. ) . Besides, the distribution, advertisement and merchandising costs along with administrative and other disbursals have increased marginally. All these costs affected the net income before revenue enhancement and therefore the company ‘s pre-tax net income border showed merely a nominal 0.5 % addition over the old twelvemonth. The revenue enhancement on company ‘s gross revenues besides depicted a 49 % rise from the old twelvemonth thereby further haltering the growing of the post-tax net income border which merely rose by 0.4 % from 2008 to 2009.

Net income from operations for both the sections of the group ( Tobacco and logistics ) , shows a considerable addition from ?1,471 million in 2008 to ?2,337 million in 2009, amounting to about 59 % rise. Whereas, if we look at the capital invested in the concern ( comprised of the non-current adoptions and equity ) , it merely increased from ?15,914 million to ?16,102 million which is a nominal 1.2 % hiking over the fiscal twelvemonth. This indicates that the return on capital employed is much higher for the twelvemonth 2009 ( 14.513 % ) than for 2008 ( 9.243 % ) .

Due to high rise in the net income after revenue enhancement in comparing to the old twelvemonth, the group has given an increased return on equity ( ROE ) in 2009. The ROE increased from 6.938 % in 2008 to 10.265 % in 2009 thereby giving the stockholders a humongous 48 % increased return on their investings.

Short-run Financial Position: Liquid

The current ratio of the group was 0.636:1 in 2009 which was negligibly lower compared to 0.681:1 in 2008. The liabilities of the group increased more steeply at 18.24 % than the assets which increased by merely 10.40 % over the last twelvemonth. This indicates that the group ‘s ability to run into its short term fiscal duties is non equal plenty.

The liquid or acerb trial ratio besides represented a similar tendency in the fiscal period considered. It declined from 0.385:1 in 2008 to 0.380:1 in 2009.

However, it can be argued that while there are non plenty liquid assets, the operating net incomes are equal to pay off the group ‘s short term debts.

In footings of efficiency, the group showed an improved public presentation over the fiscal twelvemonth. The stock list held was sold out in 50 yearss every bit compared to about 63 yearss in 2008. The exclusion to this is the ‘leaf baccy stock list ‘ which is classified as a current plus harmonizing to the industry criterion but some portion of it is non consumed within one twelvemonth. “ Leaf baccy held within natural stuffs stock lists at the balance sheet day of the month will normally be utilized within two old ages ” ( Note 12 – Inventories, Annual Report 2009 ) . Hence, if this is excluded from the stock list, the stock list yearss would cut down further.

Besides, the trade receivable yearss of the group reduced significantly from 47.4 in 2008 to 37.6 in 2009, exemplifying the fact that fewer financess were tied up with debitors for each ?1 of gross revenues in 2009 than in 2008.

The balance sheet and income statement of the group highlight that the concern took lesser clip to pay its trade creditors. The trade collectible yearss reduced to 21.5 in comparing to 24 yearss in 2008. On the face of it, this seems to be good in footings of provider good will and to strike a balance between the receivables and payables yearss.

5. Long-run Fiscal Position: Gearing

Imperial Tobacco Group is extremely geared. The one-year study suggests that the concern is majorly financed by debt and non-current adoptions, though the adoptions have decreased in comparing to old fiscal twelvemonth. The pitching ratio of the group tells us that the debt to equity has decreased from 150 per centum to 144 per centum this twelvemonth. Similarly, the net debt to equity has dropped from 140 per centum to 128 per centum. Though there is a little decrease, the degree of debt in relation to the equity still remains rather high which, for this twelvemonth, can be attributed to the strengthening of both the Euro and the US dollar against Sterling.

Besides, the involvement screen of the group has reduced from 1.1 times to 0.9 times. In the old twelvemonth the concern was still in a place to pay off the loan involvement from the operating net incomes, but this twelvemonth since the finance cost has about doubled, the net income is deficient to cover the involvement payments.

The group ‘s involvement income has increased significantly compared to last twelvemonth because of which the net involvement payable has reduced. Even though the net involvement screen has fallen from 1.73 times to 1.68 times this twelvemonth, the group is still in a place to run into the demand of net involvement collectible utilizing its operating net incomes.

Cash Flow

The concern chiefly remains hard currency generative and the “ group converted 128 per centum of their adjusted net income from operating activities after net capital outgo into hard currency, as a consequence of important working capital nest eggs of ?985 million ” ( Annual Report 2009, Imperial Tobacco Group plc. ) . The strong hard currency flows from the group ‘s operating activities have besides helped in countervailing the debt.

As can be seen from point Fifteen in the appendix of the study, the hard currency flow per portion about doubled from 159 pence in 2008 to 334 pence in 2009.

Net hard currency flow from operations was strong ( ?3569 million ) , much larger than the net income for the twelvemonth ( ?677 million ) , after taking into history the dividend paid. This would be expected because depreciation is deducted in geting at net income. There was a general inclination for working capital to absorb some hard currency. This is non surprising since there has been an enlargement of activity, in footings of gross revenues growing, over the twelvemonth.

There were net escapes of hard currency for puting activities, though much less as compared to the old twelvemonth due to significantly lesser hard currency escape in acquisitions.

The addition in the adoptions has been rather less every bit compared to last twelvemonth and there has been a major escape of hard currency for refund of adoptions. With the addition in the investing income, there was a important displacement in the equity/borrowing balance. During the twelvemonth Imperial Tobacco successfully raised ?3.9 billion through the capital markets which coupled with the working capital decrease and on-going hard currency coevals leaves the group with no refinancing demands until July 2012 ( Annual Report 2009, Imperial Tobacco Group plc. ) .

Attraction of the Group ‘s Equity Shares – Investor ‘s Position

The net incomes per portion for Imperial Tobacco Group rose from 50.6 pence to 65.5 pence from 2008 to 2009, bespeaking the fact that the net incomes available to the stockholders increased by about 30 per centum. As mentioned in 2009 ‘s one-year study of the company, its adjusted net incomes per portion have grown by 15 per centum on a compound one-year footing.

The dividend per portion besides showed a singular hiking from 62.93 pence in 2008 to 73 pence in 2009 amounting to a 17 per centum addition in the value distributed amongst the stockholders.

As mentioned in the Chairman ‘s statement in the one-year study of the group:

“ Over the past 10 old ages we have outperformed the FTSE All-Share Index by 286 % .

With dividends reinvested, ?100 invested in Imperial Tobacco ten old ages ago would now be deserving ?517 compared to merely ?134 invested in the FTSE All-Share Index. ” ( Chairman ‘s Statement, Annual Report 2009 )

Entire Shareholder return over the past ten old ages

Beginning: Imperial Tobacco Group, Annual Report 2009

Although the dividend output increased to 3.18 per centum, the dividend screen of the concern remained changeless over the twelvemonth at 1.1 times.

The monetary value per net incomes ratio of the group was 29.75 times, which reveals the fact that the capital value of the portion is rather high compared to its current degree of net incomes. This reflects the market assurance refering the hereafter of the concern and that the investors are prepared to pay more in relation to the net incomes watercourse of Imperial Tobacco Group. But this value has dropped by 30 per centum over the financial twelvemonth. Similarly, since the market monetary value of the portion has non risen significantly in comparing to the singular addition in the hard currency flow per portion, the monetary value to hard currency flow ratio besides dropped from 11.30 pence to 5.65 pence in 2009.

Overall, the gross revenues volume of the group has fallen in Russia, Spain, Ukraine and the US due to the rise in the forgery coffin nail market and besides because tobacco users by and large have switched from coffin nails to cheaper baccy in the economic lag. The monetary value to net incomes ratio and the monetary value to hard currency flow ratios have besides fallen significantly. On the other manus, the company still has a good dividend output and strong profitableness from operating activities. The PE ratio besides suggests that the stock might be undervalued.

Hence, sing all the parametric quantities on the whole, it is recommended for the bing stockholders to keep their investing. For those who are yet to put, the company ‘s chances look good merely in the long term.

Decision

The fiscal public presentation of Imperial Tobacco Group has improved over the fiscal twelvemonth in footings of net income borders and returns on equity. Although the company has increased its efficiency and repaid a significant sum of adoptions from the operating net incomes, the augmented liabilities have reduced its liquidness. The increased losingss on derivative fiscal instruments coupled with important adoptions have besides had a negative consequence on the involvement screen. Cash flow from operating activities has about doubled assisting the concern to countervail its debt. The company has provided an increased dividend and net incomes per portion but the monetary value to hard currency flow has drastically reduced, thereby rendering it a less moneymaking investing for possible investors.

Appendix

PROFITABILITY RATIOS

I Gross Net income Margin = Gross Profit/Revenue x 100

2008 GROSS PROFIT MARGIN = 3,863/20,528 x 100 = 18.818 %

2009 GROSS PROFIT MARGIN = 5,316/26,517 x 100 = 20.048 %

II Pre-Tax Profit Margin = Pre-Tax Profit/Revenue x 100

2008 PRE-TAX PROFIT MARGIN = 621/20,528 x 100 = 3.025 %

2009 PRE-TAX PROFIT MARGIN = 945/26,517 x 100 = 3.564 %

III Post-Tax Profit Margin = Post-Tax Profit/Revenue x 100

2008 POST-TAX PROFIT MARGIN = 441/20,528 x 100 = 2.148 %

2009 POST-TAX PROFIT MARGIN = 677/26,517 x 100 = 2.553 %

IV Return on Capital Employed = Operating Profit/Total Capital Employed x 100

2008 RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED = 1,471/ ( 9,558+6,356 ) x 100 = 147100/15914 = 9.243 %

2009 RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED = 2,337/ ( 9,507+6,595 ) x 100 = 233700/16102 = 14.513 %

V Return on Equity = Net income after tax/Equity x 100

2008 RETURN ON EQUITY = 441/ 6,356 ten 100 = 6.938 %

2009 RETURN ON EQUITY = 677/ 6,595 ten 100 = 10.265 %

LIQUIDITY RATIOS

VI Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilitiess

2008 WORKING CAPITAL OR CURRENT RATIO = 6,579/ 9,658 = 0.681 times ( or 0.681:1 )

2009 WORKING CAPITAL OR CURRENT RATIO = 7,263/ 11,420 = 0.636 times ( or 0.636:1 )

VII Acid Test Ratio = Current Assets excepting inventory/Current Liabilitiess

2008 LIQUID OR ACID TEST RATIO = ( 6,579-2,858 ) / 9,658 = 0.385 times ( or 0.385:1 )

2009 LIQUID OR ACID TEST RATIO = ( 7,263-2,925 ) / 11,420 = 0.380 times ( or 0.380:1 )

VIII Inventory yearss = Inventory/Cost of Gross saless x 365

2008 INVENTORY DAYS = 2,858/ 16,665 ten 365= 62.596 yearss

2009 INVENTORY DAYS = 2,925/ 21,201 ten 365= 50.357 yearss

IX Trade Receivable yearss = Trade Receivables/Revenue x 365

2008 TRADE RECIEVABLE DAYS = 2,667/20,528 x 365 = 47.4 yearss

2009 TRADE RECIEVABLE DAYS = 2,730/26,517 x 365 = 37.6 yearss

Ten Trade Payable yearss = Trade Payables/ Cost of Gross saless x 365

2008 TRADE PAYABLE DAYS = 1,096/16,665 x 365 = 24 yearss

2009 TRADE PAYABLE DAYS = 1,247/21,201 x 365 = 21.5 yearss

Gearing RATIOS

Eleven Debt to Equity = NC Borrowings/Equity x 100

2008 DEBT TO EQUITY = 9,558/6,356 x 100 = 150.377 %

2009 DEBT TO EQUITY = 9,507/6,595 x 100 = 144.154 %

Twelve Net Debt to Equity = ( NC Borrowings-Cash & A ; Cash Equivalents ) /Equity x 100

2008 Net DEBT TO EQUITY = 9,558 – 642/6,356 x 100 = 140.276 %

2009 Net DEBT TO EQUITY = 9,507 – 1,036/6,595 x 100 = 128.445 %

Thirteen Interest Cover = Operating Profit/Interest

2008 INTEREST COVER = 1,471/1,393 = 1.056 times

2009 INTEREST COVER = 2,337/2,572 = 0.909 times

Fourteen Net Interest Cover = Operating Profit/Net Interest

2008 Net Interest COVER = 1,471/ ( 1,393 – 543 ) = 1,471/850 = 1.73 times

2009 Net Interest COVER = 2,337/ ( 2,572 – 1,180 ) = 2,337/1,392 = 1.68 times

CASH FLOW

Fifteen Cash flow per portion = Cash flow from Operating activities/Total figure of Equity Shares

2008 CASH FLOW PER SHARE = 1,700/1067.9 = 159 pence

2009 CASH FLOW PER SHARE = 3,569/1067.9 = 334 pence

Investing Ratio

Note: Market monetary value taken as on 30th November 2009 is 1886 pence.

Sixteen Dividend per portion ( DPS ) = Taken from Director ‘s Report

2008 DIVIDEND PER SHARE = 62.93 P

2009 DIVIDEND PER SHARE = 73 P

Seventeen Net incomes per portion ( EPS ) = Taken from Income Statement

2008 EARNINGS PER SHARE = 50.6 P

2009 EARNINGS PER SHARE = 65.5 P

Eighteen Dividend Yield = Total Dividend/Current Market Price x 100

2009 DIVIDEND YIELD = 59.93/1886 ten 100 = 3.18 %

Nineteen Dividend screen = EPS/DPS

2008 DIVIDEND COVER = 50.6/45.6 = 0.804

2009 DIVIDEND COVER = 65.5/59.93 = 0.897

Twenty Price Net incomes Ratio = Current Market Price/EPS

2009 PRICE EARNINGS RATIO = 1886/ 63.40 = 29.75

Twenty-one Price to Cash flow = Current Market Price/Cash flow per Share

2009 PRICE TO CASH FLOW = 1886/334 = 5.65 pence

x

Hi!
I'm Heather

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out